User talk:Editor man12115

Editor man12115, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Editor man12115! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ben Shapiro, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 07:12, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm RedPanda25. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of suicides in the 21st century appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kurt Cobain was actually in the 20th century. Red Panda 25 20:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thank you, I didn’t realize he was apart of the 20th century until later on and I wanted to remove it. So thank you again for deleting it. Editor man12115 (talk) 22:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ted Bundy, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Bundy was charged with murders, his sex history appears to be after the death of his victims. Regards. David J Johnson (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok 👌🏻 Editor man12115 (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Steele Stebbins

Hi, all content on biographies of living people must have a reference as per WP:V otherwise many falsehoods and hoaxes can go unnoticed, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 01:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it’s not a hoax like I said again look it up buddy, I’m gonna put it back and if you remove it again I’m gonna be really angry. Editor man12115 (talk) 02:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not make threats or you will be blocked Atlantic306 (talk) 03:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead I never made threats though, I just said I would be angry. Editor man12115 (talk) 05:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stay off my talk page with your nasty comments. Your edit was undone because you could not be bothered to add a reference which is required for blps and nothing to do with vandalism Atlantic306 (talk) 03:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How am I being nasty? All I said was is that I would feel anger, are your feeling. hurt? You obviously have not interacted with too many people in your life to understand what being nasty means and I dic provide a source, you obviously don’t belong on wikipedia please leave so that the sane people can edit. Thank you. Editor man12115 (talk) 03:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No source given, just saying YouTube is not a proper reference Atlantic306 (talk) 03:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah because you removed it, please delete your account. Editor man12115 (talk) 03:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What else do I put? It’s not documented on anything just back off Editor man12115 (talk) 03:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, please read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution and follow the instructions there when you get into a content dispute. The two of you are acting kind of silly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User talk:Editor man12115. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fuzheado | Talk 04:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lia Thomas, you may be blocked from editing. Beccaynr (talk) 05:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t believe I am vandalizing this Wikipedia page, why would you say this to me? Editor man12115 (talk) 05:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RS has reported Thomas's pronouns as she/her. If you wanna read up more on the pronoun policy see MOS:GENDERID. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lia Thomas. Beccaynr (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How did I vandalize Wikipedia? Please explain Editor man12115 (talk) 05:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lia Thomas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Beccaynr (talk) 05:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m the righteous contrarian, the other editors are creating incorrect information, I will no longer edit Lia Thomas’s page if that keeps me from being blocked by those higher than me on the Wikipedia editing hierarchy. Thank you. Editor man12115 (talk) 05:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can still edit Lia Thomas, you just can't change the pronouns. see MOS:GENDERID Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well that was the whole idea, I believe that the pronouns that were used in this page were incorrect. Editor man12115 (talk) 05:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Our personal opinions are irrelevant. Please see MOS:GENDERID. And as you have been unable to grasp this concept, you have forced me to act to bring an end to your disruption. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Funcrunch (talk) 05:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Lia Thomas) for WP:BLP, MOS:GENDERID violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block me from his page if you want, like I said. I wasn’t going to continue editing his page anyway. Editor man12115 (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you’re born with a penis you’re a man. Editor man12115 (talk) 22:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the partial block by Deepfriedokra only led you to be disruptive elsewhere, I've modified the block to site-wide.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m giving the correct information to the public and removing the propaganda placed by internet nazis. Editor man12115 (talk) 22:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You guys aren’t too different from Nazi, Germany Editor man12115 (talk) 22:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]