User talk:Editor br

Welcome

Hello Editor br! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place `{{helpme}}` on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Kuru ^talk 02:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Clarice Lispector

Dear Editor br,

Thank you for your kind words about my Clarice Lispector article. I have long thought it was a shame that the Portuguese version was so short - such a great Brazilian deserves better! So I am very glad that you are going to expand the article and am honored that you are going to base it on mine. I would be happy to help.

Sim, eu falo português mas escrevo muito mal, desculpe.

And I thank you for your offer to help improve the English version. I have been meaning to do that for a long time now but have been too busy with other things - and besides, as a relatively new Wikipedia contributor I haven't yet put in the study time I would need to upgrade it to a featured article. But it would be good to make it definitive if we could.

I have a very large Clarice library but do not live in the United States. If there is anything you cannot find in your university library, let me know and I will be happy to share whatever I can. I don't know what the best way is to get in touch besides here - I don't want to leave my email address on this thing because as you can see from the Clarice comments page things got so heated up about a very minor point that I felt I had to disinvolve myself. Do you have any ideas?

In any case, I'm very grateful for your kind words. I also have some images I could share. The picture of her is from my collection and I am happy to release that for the Brazilian version as well, of course.

Yours, Eve.b.i (talk) 11:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laços de família

Dear editor br, I wonder if you could help me out a bit. I've started an article on Laços de Família. I don't know how to get it to be called "Family Ties" because there are so many other articles with that name. Do you know how to do this? Sorry, just learning.

Also, I'm trying to link it to the pt category "Livros de Clarice Lispector" but this isn't working. Any ideas? Thanks Eve.b.i (talk) 16:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of History of marketing thought

I have nominated History of marketing thought, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of marketing thought. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Venture capital

I noted your interest in the History of private equity and venture capital and wanted to invite you to join the Private Equity Task Force.

You have been invited to join the Private Equity Task Force, a group of Wikipedia editors that focus on articles about private equity and venture capital. The scope of this group includes private equity and venture capital related concepts, history, investors and firms.

If you are interested in joining the Private Equity Task Force, you can visit the task force project page and place following userbox on your user page: {{Userbox/privateequitytaskforce}}.

Among the tasks we are working on are:

Creating and improving articles for notable private equity and venture capital firms

Tagging articles under the scope of the task force to work on later

Adding an {{Infobox Company}} for existing articles

Please feel free to contact |► ϋrbanяenewaℓ • TALK ◄| 18:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC) or post questions on the task force talk page[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Outstanding leadership theory"

A page you created, Outstanding leadership theory, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Synchronism (talk) 05:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Outstanding leadership theory

I have nominated Outstanding leadership theory, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outstanding leadership theory. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Synchronism (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hi, I just noticed at Talk:Che Guevara that you said you're a new editor. Welcome to Wikipedia! Feel free to ask me questions on my talk page about how to do things on Wikipedia. Some things about how Wikipedia works can take some time to get used to, but it can be very satisfying. I hope you enjoy contributing. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 02:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created: Outstanding leadership theory may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outstanding leadership theory.

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for Outstanding leadership theory: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.

2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)

3. You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.

4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 04:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]