User talk:Eco30

Conflict of interest warning

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- samj _in ^out 13:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to cloud computing, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- samj _in ^out 13:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fabasoft Folio Cloud

The article Fabasoft Folio Cloud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. No basis for notability. Page has been here almost two years - sufficient time to establish notability and locate good secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joja lozzo 02:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the notice is removed. Thank you for removing it. Eco30 (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fabasoft Mindbreeze Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fabasoft Mindbreeze Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fabasoft app.test Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fabasoft app.test Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello Eco30. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Eco30. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Eco30|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have never been paid for editing articles. Eco30 (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you have no connection whatsoever to Fabasoft – seemingly the only topic you're interested in – and it is a complete coincidence that you almost exclusively edit during office hours? Good to know. Just in case that you should ever start editing for pay, you may want to note that doing so without disclosure is not only prohibited by our terms of use, but also illegal in some jurisdictions. Blablubbs|talk 16:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fabasoft eGov-Suite .jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fabasoft eGov-Suite .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]