User talk:Echo2019a

Echo2019a, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Echo2019a! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Glasgow Times, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Glasgow Times. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Killing of George Floyd has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Killing of George Floyd was changed by Echo2019a (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866452 on 2020-10-07T20:59:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Killing of George Floyd. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zocke1r (talk) 21:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Holman (footballer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harry Holman (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sixula^Talk 23:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Reid

No, it just means your stub lacked important things like an infobox and categories... Giant Snowman 16:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Hunt

Roger Hunt wasn't ever knighted, so his name isn't Sir Roger Hunt. As it says in the article: He continued to be known as "Sir" Roger Hunt by the Liverpool supporters, despite the absence of a formal knighthood. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Laundrie

HI. Please stop removing Brian Laundrie from the October 2021 list of deaths. At least until one month has passed - if he has not generated an article of his own or recieved substantial bio through redirect by that time, he can be removed as per the norm at the project. In the very unlikely event that his actual date of death becomes confirmed, he can be moved from his "(death announced on this date)" position to that actual date. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deaths in 2021. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. You were asked nicely above, but you continue to remove him, therefore you now receive a vandalism warning. --Marbe166 (talk) 22:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3RR+? Why have you continued to remove Brian Laundrie when it has clearly been explained why he is logically included in Deaths in October 2021? You are only allowed three reverts under the rules, so I suggest you desist right now. Ref ^(chew)(do) 23:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another revert. Please read and follow what the editors above said. Nukualofa (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And another identical removal today. Reversed on the basis of what has been explained to you as clearly as possible and on more than one occasion. You do need to stop. Ref ^(chew)(do) 19:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of George Floyd. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Keir Starmer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Czello 23:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - The Canine Mutiny

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - The Canine Mutiny, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - The Canine Mutiny

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - The Canine Mutiny, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Mainframe98 _talk 18:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Echo2019a, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Echo2019a (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will be very careful about editing in the future and edit less Echo2019a (talk) 18:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edits weren't a matter of carelessness, they were deliberate vandalism. You'll need to provide examples of specific edits you wish to make and convinced us you will not be disruptive in the future. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Robert Donnelly (footballer)

The article Robert Donnelly (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails GNG. I can't find much significant coverage on this player. He played a season and a half with Clyde but never attracted much media attention.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user evaded their block as Volume2022 in December, 2022. -- Yamla (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]