Jump to content

User talk:ERK/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

02:07:30, 21 June 2016 review of submission by Misceditor1000


Just wondering why you declined my submission as having inadequate references when more than one news site is referenced. I did edit out a reference which you may have thought was bloggish (the gallery of pictures) and an unsourced section is now sourced, so now I've got multiple news sources and remain wondering why it was declined if it has said sources. If you declined it because of the HighNews source, I don't even know why it can be chosen as a source from the "review waiting" box. Misceditor1000 (talk) 02:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Hello there! Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia so far! My issue was not so much with your sources, but with the notability of the theater itself. Generally speaking, a local movie theater probably isn't going to pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines. For a local movie theater to be encyclopedic, there'd really have to be some sort of notable history there. Even the theater where the 2012 Aurora shooting took place doesn't have its own page. If you can find independent, reliable, and verifiable sources that support the theater's notability, please feel free to add that information and resubmit. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask. I'm happy to help. --ERK talk 02:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hi, ERK. If you are unaware of the definition of the word, "pogrom," you will find that it more accurately describes the events in Tulsa, than does the word, "conflict." You will note in the photo caption, this is described as a "massacre." Historical scholarship on the "race riots" of the era finds that they were characterized by organized attacks on black neighborhoods. Similar campaigns organized against Jewish communities in Russia and Armenians in Turkey were not described "neutrally as "conflicts." Please see the Wikipedia link for Kristallnacht the most famous "pogrom" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht. It is not described as a conflict although it may have only had a third the deaths of the Tulsa pogrom, also known historically as the Burning of Black Wall Street. The word "conflict" actually is less "constructive," if by "constructive" accuracy in description is implied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.166.43 (talk) 01:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Typically pogrom refers to massacre or persecution motivated by antisemitism. The Tulsa race riot was not. You may find it more constructive to discuss the change on the article's talk page, as I suspect some of the regular editors there will view it as controversial. I reverted it as potential vandalism because it was an unexplained, unsourced change (and in my humble opinion, misinformation) pertaining to the definition of the subject. You may want to read up on WP:NPOV as well, as I suspect this could make a valid argument against using the term in the (very limited) contexts it is used outside of antisemitism. I'll leave your change in place for now, since it was in good faith, but I wouldn't be surprised if a regular contributor to that article takes issue with it. As I mentioned above, it might be wise to open a discussion about it on the article's talk page. --ERK talk 02:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi ERK

I finally was going to edit the page I started for the film Draft:Hummus the Movie now that it has some references and is live and in distribution. I clicked the links and did my first restore I didn't realize it had a 6 month time frame.

Just was letting you know. Thanks! Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marksingley (talk • contribs) 15:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help

Hi ERK,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ERK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk 15:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ERK/Archive_2&oldid=1144733205"