User talk:EPEAviator

West Stow Hall moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, West Stow Hall, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: West Stow Hall has been accepted

West Stow Hall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nettlestead Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nettlestead. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

disambiguation page edits “Identified as test/vandalism”

you reverted my edit to the Azov disambiguation page because it was identified by AI as “test/vandalism”. it is neither - i heard of a neo-Nazi group named Azov and when i searched wikipedia, it took me to the sea of the same name instead of what i was looking for. the disambiguation page is supposed to help people in such situations as mine, so that’s why i edited it. thanks, 2603:8000:7F03:865A:7129:2572:7B86:CCD2 (talk) 22:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia is a neutral site, and so there is a responsibility to source calling something Neo-Nazi, and further to this the short description of Azov is probably better that it is just a Ukrainian military unit or similar. Sorry that it identified it as potential vandalism, this is due to the use of the word "Nazi" and your editing anonymously, I expect. However, neo-Nazi is not what a neutral body would describe it as in such a short area. It is elaborated on further in the article (from which it is clear Azov is certainly at least far-right, imho), but for the disambiguation page it is not worth or neutral to say that it is neo-Nazi. EPEAviator (talk) 22:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is best to write neo-Nazi-associated or similar, for the neutrality, if you can source it, rather than just neo-Nazi. EPEAviator (talk) 22:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have set it to the short description of the actual page. I have not been following the neutrality talks for this Amazon battalion, but I expect there is a general reluctance to (even if by Western sources potentially accurate) play into the Russian narrative of Nazis. So I think it is best to leave it at what the page itself is briefly described as, for which I would believe there has been more discussion. EPEAviator (talk) 22:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Azov_Battalion/Archive_2#RfC:_Azov_Battalion EPEAviator (talk) 22:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit to Adam Weitsmans page even though I removed the issue. After removing the issue of his philanthropy section I took down the banner as it was no longer necessary. Why did you do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwals1022 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwals1022: Hi, sorry that it says it could be potential vandalism, I thought I had removed that part. It is not vandalism. I understand why you might have removed what you did, however I do not think it violates NPOV, and this section is a common part of Public figures' (especially businesspersons') Wikipedia Pages. Whilst it might be worth removing some of them, removing them in entirety is not fair, and some of his comments, as per their sourcing, are probably notable. EPEAviator (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So how would you suggest I remove the banner entirely? Dwals1022 (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Dwals1022 (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwals1022: I will give it a bash without removing the banner but in essence remove the smaller donations, probably migrate it over to career. EPEAviator (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am unconcerned with the why the banner is there. I want to remove the banner from the page entirely and will do whatever necessary to get it removed. I believe all pages should be free of an advertising and want to work to remove it from any page. So I just want to know what I need to do to remove the banner. Thank you. Dwals1022 (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwals1022: If we edit the page and both agree there is no longer advertisement going on, then we can remove the banner, thus I am editing it currently and then you choose once I have done so. EPEAviator (talk) 16:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds reasonable. Thank you for the assistance on this matter. I appreciate the discourse we have been able to have over this and once you are done I will review. Again, thank you. Dwals1022 (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed your changes to the page and agree with them. I think taking away the more minimal donations makes it more credible however I think that we should also remove the final sentence: In 2021, Weitsman offered to pay $1,000,000 to local charities, following the win of the basketball team, Boeheim's Army. I think that even though there is a credible news source it isn't necessary note worthy because he just "offered" to do it. I think once we remove then it will be appropriate to remove the banner completely. Thanks. Dwals1022 (talk) 17:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

An article you recently created, The Chronicle (Eton College), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 14:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, due to The Harrovian (Harrow School) page existing (that magazine I believe being the fourth-longest-running UK school publication under the same name, behind the Chronicle (Eton College), the Wykehamist (Winchester College) & the Elizabethan (Westminster School)), the history & controversy of Eton College itslef and the plethora of historical contributors who have notability, it seems reasonable for the article to itself posess notability. The newspaper is referenced in several articles about said and other notable people, especially obituaries, and for the journalists & politicians is typically a part of their progression to the roles they hold. EPEAviator (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eton College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Chronicle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chronicle (Eton College) (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Chronicle (Eton College) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EPEAviator! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Corby Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Country House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, EPEAviator. Thank you for your work on Herringston House. User:Ingratis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

thank you for this interesting article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 05:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Chronicle (Eton College)

Hello, EPEAviator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Chronicle (Eton College), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Chronicle (Eton College)

Hello, EPEAviator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Chronicle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

A.D.Hope (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Country Life

How do I support your excellent and much overdue Country Life access proposal? Do I have to resubmit the form? Thank you so much for suggesting this! No Swan So Fine (talk) 13:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your support! So, you go to this link (https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/suggest/), potentially have to click "Log in" in the top right and follow the steps there, and then search for my request ("Country Life Archive (Proquest)") and click "Upvote". EPEAviator (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lobenhoffer (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lobenhoffer (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]