User talk:E-Kartoffel/Archive 1

Your edits to Soft Machine/Kevin Ayers

Hi E-Kartoffel Nice work on your edits. Excellent job. Best Wishes Yahoogiddix 07:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, E-Kartoffel/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 11:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Toe Rag Studio

Your recent edit to Toe Rag Studio was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 12:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Honeycombs-lp-65.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Honeycombs-lp-65.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Angry-young-them.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Angry-young-them.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 14:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.

Pick an image name.

When uploading an image, pick a file name that is descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.

Source the image.

On the image description page, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so. If it's from the web, give a URL. If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.

Provide copyright and license information.

This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whomever created it.

If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like Photoshop or GIMP, then you own the copyright. To upload it to Wikipedia, you must agree to license it under the GFDL (which allows anyone to use it, but requires that they give credit to the original author and requires that any further edit to the image be licensed under the GFDL as well) or release it into the public domain (which allows anyone to use it for any purpose without restriction.) Do this by placing an appropriate tag on the image description page, like {{GFDL}} or {{PD}}. Be sure to mention that you created the image. If you're using {{PD}}, you may also want to use {{NoRightsReserved}}, since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.

If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another tag that describes the copyright status of the image. Images used on Wikipedia need to be free for our use and the use of sites which reproduce our content. This means that images cannot have a restriction such as "only for use by Wikipedia", or "for non-commercial use only", or "for educational use". Images without a free license may be usable in certain articles under fair use, but such a use should be justified on the image description page.

Describe the image.

To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page. Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Copyrights, Copyright tags, Fair use, Image description page, Public domain, Images for deletion, Possibly unfree images, Copyright problems, Uploading images

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page. feydey 14:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Stay-with-the-hollies.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stay-with-the-hollies.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Versions of articles in other languages

Hi. In this edit I notice you removed links to versions of the articles in other languages inappropriately in the Odeon Records article. I assume this was an accident or mistake. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 19:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Jones

Your latest edit to Tower Records (record label) makes it sound as though Jones didn't have any releases on Tower. Is that true? If so, he shouldn't even be mentioned in the article. —Chowbok 21:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Geniac 15:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Over a year later and you're still not using them. - Dudesleeper · Talk 14:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walk on By (disambiguation)

Please do not make multiple deletions of entries with absolutely no explanation. Your edits were reverted.--Hraefen ^Talk 15:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Edit Summary

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! --Geniac 17:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Attack

Can't see a valid link to the group of that name from Hi Ho Silver Lining. Bob aka Linuxlad 21:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you spend a lot of time with categories. You might want to look at the {{DEFAULTSORT}} template that I added to The Waikikis. TonyTheTiger 17:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Duddy (boxer) 23 February 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Vintagekits 21:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought a man born in Northern Ireland is a UK citizen, not an Irish citizen. If I'm wrong I am sorry, I don't want to be political in this case. E-Kartoffel 11:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beatle covers

You are moving songs into a category that is being considered for deletion... Are you aware of what's going on there? I'm not, but if you aren't, please find out before you move any more... John Cardinal 14:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am moving them to keep the Category "alive" E-Kartoffel 14:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All cover song categories were deleted and you probably won't be successful. I suggest you stop moving them and instead participate in the delete discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 8. John Cardinal 15:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Meek at list of blue plaques

I removed Joe Meek from the "London/English Heritage" section of list of blue plaques because we was not listed at the English Heritage website ([1]) and because you did not provide a reference. Joe Meek is already listed in the "other similar plaques" section of list of blue plaques, although information and references are missing from the entry.

Can you provide more information on Joe Meek's plaque? We are currently guessing that it is not an English Heritage plaque, but we have no other information. Could you also provide a reference? Thank you, Dr. Submillimeter 14:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you add something, anything

to your User:Page, then your name will appear in blue instead of red and you will gain 23% (carpmath) more respect around wikipedia. We edit some of the same pages - I tend to add EP covers to the likes of The Mojos, Star Club, etc. There was more I wanted to say, but I've forgotten what. Oh well. Carptrash 15:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

Please don't move articles via cut-and-paste, as it separates the text from the edit history. If a situation like this comes up again, please consider posting to Requested Moves. Gimmetrow 14:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Judas Jump has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn 19:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Fancy (band)

A tag has been placed on Fancy (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wikiman53 t a 13:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bomp-mag-10-11.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bomp-mag-10-11.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blossom-toes-ever-so-clean.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blossom-toes-ever-so-clean.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Heinzwildboys.jpg

I have tagged Image:Heinzwildboys.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 11:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tv-personalities-kids-dont-album.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tv-personalities-kids-dont-album.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:In-the-hollies-style.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:In-the-hollies-style.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jc-desdemona-single.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jc-desdemona-single.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Television-personalities-darkplaces.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Television-personalities-darkplaces.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Honeycombs-lp-65.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Honeycombs-lp-65.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hollies-would-y-believe.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hollies-would-y-believe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hollies-for-certain.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hollies-for-certain.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hollies-butterfly.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hollies-butterfly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Skip-bifferty-lp.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Skip-bifferty-lp.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tomorrow-50-minute.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tomorrow-50-minute.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Them-album-usa.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Them-album-usa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tower-records-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tower-records-logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use Rationale

Hi, thanks for your imput on the Small Faces articles, BTW I added a fair use rationale for your image for 50 Minute Technicolor Dream. Sue Wallace 20:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar; then encourage them to give it to 3-5 others that deserve it. and so on and so forth, this way everyone who deserves it will get one.

Pseudoanonymous 18:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Fritz (band)

A tag has been placed on Fritz (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -Bbik^★ 09:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Dereklawrence sessions1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dereklawrence sessions1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Pipelineinstrumentalreview73.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pipelineinstrumentalreview73.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Theattackcd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Theattackcd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling Stones

Care to join the WP for the Stones? Stan weller 07:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GaryGlitter Rock and Roll.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GaryGlitter Rock and Roll.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Green Tambourine

Hey... just a note to ask you to please be careful with page moving. Please don't do cut & paste jobs, as you did moving the Green Tambourine album.... this breaks up the edit history. Normally the album would get the non-disambiguated title and then the song would be disambiguated with "(song)", so in this particular case there was no need to move anything. - eo 17:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beatle Track Listings

because a song starts as a single doesn't mean it wasn't an album track; which comes first is important, but not exclusive. I have reverted your deletion of track listings and I wish you would stop deleting them. John Cardinal 21:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Sound(s) of Silence

Hi there. Note that I've already reverted a previous change of yours like this one, for the reasons stated in my edit summary. Note that most compilations do not list the track as "The Sounds of Silence" but as "The Sound of Silence". --PEJL 17:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heronanthology.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Heronanthology.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reach for the Stars (song)

A tag has been placed on Reach for the Stars (song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 13:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shout and Shimmy

Thanks for creating the article on "Shout and Shimmy". Do you plan to make more James Brown song articles? InnocuousPseudonym 17:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Samuelprody.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Samuelprody.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Endofanear.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Endofanear.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Delshannon-homeandaway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Delshannon-homeandaway.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Strawbs template

Hi there. I noticed that you had amalgamated the "All our own work" album with "Sandy and the Strawbs". I own both these albums and they are different (track listing and also arrangements). I am proposing to revert this particular edit but will await your comments. I also note that Sandy Denny has been removed from the "former members list". May I ask why you have done this? Best regards Witchwooder 10:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Strawbs related articles

Hi again. I have noticed that you have changed the format of some album names in the chronology. If you refer to WP:ALBUM I think you will find that they were correct as they were. You also refer to the band as THE Strawbs - this is incorrect, apart from quoting from album titles such as Sandy Denny and the Strawbs. I also notice that you seem to have confused the latter album with All Our Own Work (see previous comment). These two albums are distinct and have differing track listings and I intend to create an article for the former. See Talk:All Our Own Work for a discussion of other issues concerning these albums. Best regards Witchwooder 13:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I notice that you have again edited Sandy Denny and the Strawbs, changing recording dates and the artist. I have tried to involve you in the discussion about this but you have not responded. There is a discrepancy between the sleeve liner notes for All Our Own Work and the Hannibal Records release regarding the actual recording dates. The Pickwick notes (and Strawbs website) record the date as August 1968, whereas the Hannibal CD cover simply states "The original 1967 sessions". I would think that it is more likely to be the 1968 date - but I sugest that the discrepancy is made part of the article (I will do this now!). With regards to the artist name - Strawbs have never been known as "Sandy Denny and the Strawbs", this was probably a marketing ploy on behalf of Pickwick and later Hannibal to capitalise on the Denny name (I have put this in the article). Sandy Denny was recruited as Strawbs' singer - the band were never her backing band (she was not an established artist at the time of the recordings). Please do not keep changing this. I have also corrected the link to Denmark (NOT Danmark) as this is an English language article. (Danmark is a redirect.) Best Witchwooder 08:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Delshannon-homeandaway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Delshannon-homeandaway.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chicka-chicka.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chicka-chicka.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Elaine Cassidy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Elaine Cassidy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chordssofaraway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chordssofaraway.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling Stones

Would you like to joing the Stones' WikiProject? Stan weller 06:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lp-food-ddco.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lp-food-ddco.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Johnnyrememberme.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnnyrememberme.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heinzlp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Heinzlp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hightidelp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hightidelp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jetnothingcd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jetnothingcd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kingcoletrioroute66.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kingcoletrioroute66.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter & Gordon

Re A World Without Love, I don't know whether it should be Peter and Gordon or Peter & Gordon. The Wikipedia article is named "Peter & Gordon" and so linking to the "and" version causes a redirect. I assume there has been discussion about how to name that page and if so, Peter & Gordon is probably the preferred form. I'll stop reverting you because I don't really care about this but IMO you should investigate and either use the & form or change the links to use the text you want but avoid the redirect, i.e., [[Peter & Gordon|Peter and Gordon]]. John Cardinal 22:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shindigmag.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shindigmag.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Mind (James Brown song)

Good work creating this article. Keep up the wikipedia-ing! —Scouter Sig 15:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Timeboxsingle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Timeboxsingle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs covered by Cream

Hi, E-Kartoffel. In the past, there have been a number of discussions that resulted in the deletion categories dedicated to groups' cover songs. I have just proposed that Category:Songs covered by Cream be merged back Category:Cream songs, here. If you have any thoughts on this move, one way or another, please join the discussion. Best regards ×Meegs 17:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Denny and the Strawbs

Hi E-Kartoffel, I notice that yet again you have added a Sandy Denny chronology to this article and changed the names of the performers. I have written to you about this before but I will restate what I know to be true about this matter. This is NOT a Sandy Denny album. At the time that the tracks were recorded, Sandy was a member of Strawbs. The name appearing on the album cover is there as a marketing ploy only (the original version of the recordings were released just after Strawbs' success with "Part of the Union" and Sandy's high profile contribution to "Battle of Evermore" on Led Zepellin IV). The album should not appear as a Sandy Denny album, any more than the Fairport Convention albums she contributed to. Please don't just reinstate this without discussion. Best Witchwooder (talk) 11:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

I notice that you have reinstated the catalogue reference in the label field of the infobox. The catalogue reference is already stated in the release history section. See WP:ALBUM#Label for correct use of this field. Best Witchwooder (talk) 09:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The riot squad 1960s.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The riot squad 1960s.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Uncledog-oldhat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Uncledog-oldhat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Burdon and Animals

Hi. You're doing good work on these articles, but you are making a mistake by changing the article titles of songs and albums from using "The Animals" in the disambig part to "Eric Burdon". These were songs and albums by Eric Burdon and The Animals, which was a name for The Animals that happened to highlight their lead singer. These are NOT Eric Burdon solo songs or albums, which came later after his time with War. ALL of The Animals' work is put under The Animals categories, and the disambig phrases should also stay consistent. Wasted Time R 19:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Category:Eric Burdon albums should not contain Animals albums or War albums. In both those cases, the group was The Animals or War, and Burdon was highlighted in the group's name as lead singer. Burdon's solo career does not begin until after his time with War. Wasted Time R 19:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Animals and Eric Burdon and The [New] Animals are two different eras of the same band, with Burdon and Jenkins carrying over. Every music source and discography treats these as all parts of The Animals, see All Music Guide at [2], or Rolling Stone at [3]. Nobody treats the second era as Eric Burdon solo work. Wasted Time R 20:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to get into edit battles, but your changes in this area go completely against reliable sources and common practice in this area, and I will revert them this evening. Please don't continue doing pointless changes. Wasted Time R 20:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The URL you pointed to, [4], is a deliberately incomplete history of the band. (He's embarrased about the EB&TA era, perhaps.) I am very familiar with the history of the band, and what you are doing is not in accordance with how reputable music sources treat the band's full 1960s history. Wasted Time R 20:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please write on my talk page, not my user page. Wasted Time R 20:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Is Here

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eric Is Here, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mp3.com/albums/23360/summary.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shadows-same-61.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shadows-same-61.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rain (The Beatles song)

You changed the Infobox from "Infobox single" to "Infobox song", but it was a single... what gives? John Cardinal (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:People from The Dingle, Liverpool

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:People from The Dingle, Liverpool, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:People from The Dingle, Liverpool has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:People from The Dingle, Liverpool, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Froots-mag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Froots-mag.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:I-hear-a-new-world.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:I-hear-a-new-world.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UK No. 1's

Hi, I know you add a lot of UK NO. 1 infoboxes to song articles, I've added one for Singing the Blues but it creates a dead-end, do you know how I can rectify this? Many thanks in advance. Sue Wallace (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ian A. Anderson

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ian A. Anderson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thevips.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thevips.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The-viper-label-logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:The-viper-label-logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thetornadoesusa.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thetornadoesusa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thetruthposter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thetruthposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tornados-telstar-german-sleeve.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tornados-telstar-german-sleeve.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tower-records-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tower-records-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poetry in Motion

Could you please stop moving the page without discussion? As far as I can tell there is no evidence that the song should be the primary page. It gets no google hits in the top five pages at least. Whisperednumber (talk) 00:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever God Shines His Light

This song was a duet written by Van Morrison, who does not have "HIs" whole discography displayed on the song article. This is supposed to be an enclyopedia, not a showcase for someones's favorite artist. If fairness was involved we would also put Van Morrison's discography on top of Cliff Richard's, now wouldn't that be a mess for people interested in reading the article? Appreciate your thought and common sense on this matter. Thanks, Agadant (talk) 21:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Campbell and his Friends

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alex Campbell and his Friends, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/~zierke/sandy.denny/records/originalsandydenny.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to The Man Who Called Himself Jesus

Hi, I noticed that you have put the catalog number in the "Label" field in the info box. I think that this is incorrect (you have done this before to other Strawbs pages). I will put a release history in the article and show it there. Also - read up on the start date template about adding month and day. Best Witchwooder (talk) 08:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Over-under-sideways-frg.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Over-under-sideways-frg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Use Edit Summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. BigHairRef | Talk 19:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Jccort (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Spookytooth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Spookytooth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lucky Lips

A tag has been placed on Lucky Lips requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hot200245 (talk) 13:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jackie wilson higher single.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jackie wilson higher single.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing links after page moves

Hi there. After you move a page such as Real Me to Real Me (Buffy episode) to free up the original name for other uses, please remember to fix up all the incoming links to the original name. In this particular case, a substantial number of previously correct links to the Buffy episode ended up pointing to a dab page instead. Thanks, Hqb (talk) 19:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine now. Thanks! Hqb (talk) 20:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

High Heel Sneakers

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of High Heel Sneakers, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Tommy Tucker. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Life in the Death of Joe Meek

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A Life in the Death of Joe Meek, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of A Life in the Death of Joe Meek. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit attempts to assert notability for a film, A Life in the Death of Joe Meek, by asserting that the subject of the film, Joe Meek, produced a single that was notable. Notability, though, is not inherited. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of A Life in the Death of Joe Meek

An article that you have been involved in editing, A Life in the Death of Joe Meek, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Life in the Death of Joe Meek. Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Knight (basketball)

I moved the article back to Bob Knight. The addition of extra text in parentheses is normally only necessary if an article already exists at a location and a subsequent article needs to be created. See Mike Leach as an example. There are three articles: Mike Leach (a college football coach), Mike Leach (American football), and Mike Leach (tennis). Usually, but not always, the one without parentheses is the most well-known of the group simply because the higher profile the subject, the sooner an article often gets created. →Wordbuilder (talk) 20:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lost move

Why did you moved Fire + Water to Fire and Water (Lost)? –thedemonhog talk • edits 16:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy and The Strawbs

Hi there. May I ask why you have categorised this album as a Sandy Denny album? I have asked twice before and never received the courtesy of a reply. This a STRAWBS album. Sandy was a member of Strawbs at this time just as later she was a member of Fairport Convention - but none of the Fairport albums are listed in the Sandy Denny album category. Please don't keep doing this without a discussion. Best Witchwooder (talk) 07:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ugly-things-24.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ugly-things-24.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Bowie Template

Nice linking for the template! But the edit you made that shortened the title of "The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars" to just "Ziggy Stardust" was a little un-necessary. Shortening titles is okay in other places, but it's not really okay in this instance. Thanks for linking anyway! Kermit1234 (talk) 01:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ugly-things-24.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ugly-things-24.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Actionatcircle.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Actionatcircle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 23:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hitchhiking (disambiguation)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hitchhiking (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Hitch hike. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamtime (disambiguation)

I have just reverted your edit to that page. Please read my edit summary in the page's history and you'll learn why. Regards, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bodast.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Bodast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 05:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Gallagher

Hi. I notice you moved this article (which I created) to "Mick Gallagher", citing a Blockheads site as a reference. Per here for example, Gallagher was always referred to as Mickey during his work with The Clash. I wondered where the best place would be to discuss the proper naming of the article. In any case the redirects created by the move will need to be fixed. Any thoughts? --John (talk) 15:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Mick Gallagher. --John (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the link from Mickey Gallagher still works!. I think the Blockheads (his current/most recent band of his many bands) site reflects how he wants to be called today. (E-Kartoffel (talk) 15:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I take your point. I'd still like to see more references for the name. --John (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B'Day

Hi. I'm wondering why you moved this page? There are no other articles with this title, so disambiguation is not necessary. Are you creating a new article for a non-Beyonce-related "B'Day"? Per naming conventions, it should technically be "B'Day (album)" not "B'Day (Beyoncé album), if a move is needed... which I don't think it is. - eo (talk) 17:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Thesynsingle.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Thesynsingle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 04:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Man Who Sold the World

Hey E-Kartoffel, why did you move the album article from The Man Who Sold the World to The Man Who Sold the World (album)? I believe it is standard for the album article to be named "The Man Who Sold the World" while the song would be "The Man Who Sold the World (song)". Thanks for reading, indopug (talk) 17:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]