User talk:Dyslexicbudgie

Welcome

Hello Dyslexicbudgie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jpeeling 09:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to Collingwood Football Club

Unfortunately, you had edited a vandalised version of the article without noticing it, so I had to restore the last OK version. Sorry about that - you'll have to do your changes again. MER-C 10:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've just blocked you for 24 hours for this disgraceful racial attack - please make no repeat of this when you return. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've now extended this to indefinate per consensus on WP:AN/I, I am willing to unblock if you assure us that this will not happen again. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Comment was made in jest, will not happen again. 24 hour ban has been served, indefinate a tad harsh considering 99 percent of my contributions have been positive.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Discussion on ANI seems to lean toward forgiveness and you said you would abide by Ryan's terms. Your original 24 hour block would have expired by now. Note that any similar "jokes" will be met with an indef block that is not likely to be lifted.

Request handled by: Mr.Z-man 00:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BundFC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BundFC.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Please note that you're pointy comments aren't really welcome here[1]. Remember you are treading on thin ice after your last RfA comment - I suggest you cut it out. Ryan Postlethwaite 01:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. You were unblocked on the promise of good behaviour - but you've already seriously depleted people's patience. I suggest you reconsider your RfA participation. WjBscribe 01:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dyslexicbudgie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agreed not to make any racist jokes. I fail to see how my latest comment is worthy of an indefinate block

when I was only stating my view on the matter. If having a sense of humour is a crime then I am guilty

Decline reason:

You agreed to refrain from inappropriate comments. Your first action back was to continue making inappropriate comments. You have shown it would be counterproductive to unblock you. — Yamla 03:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dyslexicbudgie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, well in that case I ask you delete this account as I no longer wish to contribute to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

See below. I have deleted your user page, but will not currently delete this talk page for record purposes. — Sandstein 06:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may wish to see WP:USERNAME#Deleting_your_account. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Donald Bradman article

just because the article on Donald Bradman is rated b doesnt mean its the end of the world. It can be improved. Pattav2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.194.21 (talk) 02:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STFU Dyslexicbudgie (talk) 20:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dyslexicbudgie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I learnded my lessons

Decline reason:

Clearly not given the edit listed by MaxSem below. — Yamla (talk) 21:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What exacly have you learned, especially in the light of your recent edit? MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 20:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you can only disrupt wikipedia for so long until it becomes boring. I have recently found this out, so I would like to put the errors of my ways behind me and start fresh. In relation to my latest edit, I am a strong believer that the Bradman article is one of the best going around, so it angers me when people leave comments like that just to frustrate me. Regards Dyslexicbudgie (talk) 21:03,

21 December 2007 (UTC)

I dont think you have learnt your lesson. We are trying to build up a great encyclopedia. But people like you are continusly making silly edits. The wikipedia rateing system is fair and i think you have to learn how to control your anger.Pattav2 (talk) 10:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Coventry Timeline.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Coventry Timeline.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Nard 02:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

File:JohnColeman66.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:JohnColeman66.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) 07:38, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nuts Coventry.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Nuts Coventry.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GGConcert.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GGConcert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]