User talk:Dustinlull

Welcome to my talk page! Messages posted on here will be responded to on here.

Contagion

Hey, thanks for the great "Scientific accuracy" addition at Contagion (film). The talk page's "References to use" section has some references to, well, use. If you search contagion science in Google for the last month, you can find even more references. Hope you'll contribute more! Erik (talk | contribs) 16:23, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Dustinlull (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

==Diastasis Recti Hey Dustin, just wondering why you´re deleting the Diastasis citation. The article asked for one and I feel we´re adding good content. (if we misunderstood something on Wiki could you please let me know?) Thank you.

Hi Adequay!

The website you are citing is not a valid source since it is a business selling a product. Can you perhaps find a published study or article?Dustinlull (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

We're doing the best we can to deal with vandalism. You can help, too.

Abigail was here :D _{Talk to Me.} _{Email Me.} 00:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. When you recently edited Eddie Tabash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CFI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmos

Thanks on removing that: I completely misread the NYTimes piece thinking they were opposing views. --MASEM (t) 13:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Happy editing! :-) Dustinlull (talk) 13:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skeptoid AfD

Dustin, you've got to state your opinion on WP:Articles for deletion/Skeptoid (2nd nomination), not just the Skeptoid talk page. But first look at WP:AADD.--S. Rich (talk) 18:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Randi GA nomination

I have started a GA review of an article to which you have recently contributed. Any help in addressing the concerns raised in the review are welcome.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll check it out.Dustinlull (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for fixing the deadlink I tagged on James Randi. I didn't know how. Bishonen | talk 13:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

No problem! Thank goodness for Wayback Machine.Dustinlull (talk) 13:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your well reasoned assistance

Thanks for your well reasoned assistance in the alternative medicine article putting air tight sources in the first lead paragraph. Now let's see if we can keep the content and sources from being slowly removed. Thanks again. :) ParkSehJik (talk) 17:12, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Dustinlull, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Choosing Wisely. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like no one has ever welcomed you to Wikipedia even though you have been around for a while. Hello, and thanks for what you did to the Choosing Wisely article. There are lots of us editing health articles at WP:WikiProject Medicine and if you ever need help or more attention for any health topic, then feel free to visit. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Game show entry

Hi Dustinlull

Considering your entry/re entry of advertisement for some game show in the Remote viewing article, you should try and rephrase it so that it does not advertise some particular show, and also so your entry becomes relevant to the article and the specific section. Many times it becomes more clear if one leaves out irrelevant stuff. (Slorri (talk) 17:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Slorri,

Thank you for the feedback. For the record, that entry was not originally put in the article by me. I also want to clarify that the One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge is not a game show, but rather an opportunity for individuals to demonstrate paranormal abilities for a one million dollar reward, should they succeed. The edit you made left the sentence:

Various skeptic organizations have conducted experiments for remote viewing and other alleged paranormal abilities, with no positive results under properly controlled conditions.

I felt the paragraph read better when it had additional details about a specific organization and set of experiments. If you disagree, we can talk about it more on the Talk page of the remote viewing article. Kind regards, Dustinlull (talk) 15:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I left that first sentence in the paragraph because I could not argue against it, it's very likely that various sceptical organizations has conducted experiments and come to no positive results. The main reason I noticed that advertisement and removed it was that just before had someone gone around on a large amount of wikipedia pages and updated their spamming posts. We can do like this: I redo my edit of the article and open a question on the talk page, to see if someone can argue for this advertisement entry in some way. (Slorri (talk) 18:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Contagion (film)

Thank you for the "thanks"!
Cheers!— | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 19:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Pod Delusion may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

2012|date=22 July 2011}}</ref> The show is partnered with the [[British Humanist Association]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Humanism online and in your ears: The Pod Delusion partners with the BHA|publisher=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Pod Delusion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard Wiseman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

"(Another thing is] the problem with prayer; I'm always very sceptical of anything which is low-input, but makes you

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Wiseman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the revert, it was an inadvertent edit on a touchscreen. Andrew³²⁷ 12:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work

Hi there, I just wanted to say thank you for the excellent contributions towards Free Fall (2013 film)‎. The article itself has potential to be a featured article, if only I could get the Azerbaijani version translated into good English. Tried using Google Translator, and its just gobbledegook. Been to the translation team at Wikipedia and all the ones who can translate Azeri to English have been inactive for the last 5 years. Only thing I can think of is to check Wikipedians who have had topic bans from Azerbaijan-related articles, and see if they would be able to help with translating. But I'm not sure if that would also get them into trouble, despite the fact they would be helping out. Any suggestions? Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 13:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I would like to do some additional work to that page. The Azeri article looks amazing! Unfortunately, I'm a wiki amateur, so I'm not sure how to even begin getting it translated.Dustinlull (talk) 14:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I'm going to post a message at WikiProject Azerbaijan and see if any of their members may be able to help with the translation. It is worth a shot, as we have nothing to lose really. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 15:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Gorey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Weller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for David Suhor

On 11 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Suhor, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that David Suhor (pictured) opened proceedings for a meeting of the Pensacola City Council by delivering a Satanic prayer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Suhor. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dustinlull. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vestibular hyperacusis

Dear Dustinlull: Sorry, but this article is a clear candidate for deletion. Then: WP never provides sources for WP. Here it is even worse: there are no valid sources. Greetings. --Saidmann (talk) 20:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saidmann, I agree with you. I have nominated the Vestibular hyperacusis page for deletion.Dustinlull (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I had hoped that someone would do this. --Saidmann (talk) 20:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dustinlull. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dustinlull. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dustinlull. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]