User talk:Dunsinan

Welcome!

Hello, Dunsinan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hydraulic power pack, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Andy Dingley (talk) 20:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hydraulic power pack

The article Hydraulic power pack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very close to speedy deletion here.... This is a very short article with only a passing mention of hydraulic power packs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down

Hi Dunsinan. Thank you for your enthusiasm and contributions to Wikipedia. Please work on improving the four articles that you already created before creating any more. It is important that articles be properly referenced and not written like an essay. Please take a moment to read some of the tutorials linked in the above welcome message and ask any questions you have.- Mr X 20:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valveless pumping

The article Valveless pumping has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a number of tiny fragment dumps purporting to be articles. We need to be better than this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pump curve

The article Pump curve has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a number of fragment dumps from this author. This is not how we should work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steam pumps

The article Steam pumps has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another fragment dump, pretending to be an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sentence strips, uses, and conundrums (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not sure what this is, but it's not a DAB. It really just seems to be a random collection of words, some of which happen to be linked.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sentence strips, uses, and conundrums and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 02:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sentence strips, uses, and conundrums (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Whatever it is, it's not a usable draft for an encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sentence strips, uses, and conundrums and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dunsinan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved

Hello, Dunsinan. I just wanted to let you know that I changed the title of Category:Synoptic Concepts, which you submitted, to Draft:Synoptic Concepts, because the page was in the wrong namespace. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please I am assisting somebody's someone and require changing my user:--Dunsinan (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC) to its Nickname Joseph L. Russell, Jr. Can I edit Joseph Russell Jr. If I am to have a following please help edit its page. Your contribution is desirable and I want you to be included.Dunsinan (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coming apart and Guanches

Hello Dunsinan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Coming apart and Guanches for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coming apart and Guanches

The article Coming apart and Guanches has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Incomprehensible. No idea what this is about.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Coming apart and Guanches, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

I have spent quite a lot of time trying to make sense of the various pages you have created and I'm afraid to say I find all of them incomprehensible polemics, bits of personal history and then snippets of unrelated content. To edit there is a need to have some degree of ability required which I am doubting you have. Before considering any action, which I have to say is proposing a block on your editing Wikipedia further, I would like to hear from you as to why you consider your edits are a net benefit to Wikipedia or anything else you think I maybe be misunderstanding about your edits. Nthep (talk) 19:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph L. Russell, Jr.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph L. Russell, Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nthep (talk) 20:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Coming apart Guanches

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Coming apart Guanches, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nthep (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph L. Russell, Jr.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Joseph L. Russell, Jr., a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is clear evidence that this was autobiographical. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Joseph L. Russell, Jr., to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of How to draft, edit, and publish your first mark up (disambiguation)

The article How to draft, edit, and publish your first mark up (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Borderline patent nonsense, and not actually a disambiguation page. It looks like some content was copied from other pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sunmist (talk) 20:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at How to draft, edit, and publish your first mark up (disambiguation), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Cabayi (talk) 22:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is clearly not a draft article, so there's nothing here to review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dunsinan/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Sentence strips, uses, and conundrums

Draft:Sentence strips, uses, and conundrums, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sentence strips, uses, and conundrums and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sentence strips, uses, and conundrums during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dunsinan/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Dunsinan/sandbox, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is word salad.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dunsinan/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 21:46, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Dunsinan/sandbox

User:Dunsinan/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dunsinan/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dunsinan/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply trying to publish not only for my personal wealth but as a contributor editor of wikipedia articles on cloud. If I sound pronouced please forgive me. What is wrong with uploading content I have researched and verified? I am a healthy adult. Have you any good examples? Dunsinan (talk) 21:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.