User talk:Dudy001
Welcome!
Hello, Dudy001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Air sovereignty, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 13:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Air sovereignty
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 13:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of American Spinal Injury Association, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.asia-spinalinjury.org.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of American Spinal Injury Association
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on American Spinal Injury Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Dudy, what's the point of this page? I'm not sure what the point of creating a list of Wikipedia pages that have the phrase "starvation wage" in them, and even less sure when you add pages that just have "starvation" and "wage" in them. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Because starvation wages is not covered in the English Wiki. Perhaps one could make an article about the exploitation of men by men in working through the diverse articles already existing in wiki. In Germany we have something like minimum wages in some branches and starvation wages are illegal and can be punished. Nevertheless if the workers get hunger wages (German: Hungerlohn) then there are less taxes on wages for the fiscus and less payment into the social security (i.e. health-, jobless-, care and pension insurance) and the employers who don't pay enought (despite more and more productivity) severely damage the social system as a whole over the lifetime of people several times despite the systematic destruction of families and homes by forcing the husband to work at one corner of the world and the wife at the other. and so on and so forth... Starvation wages are a really really evil thing!--Dudy001 (talk) 19:20, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- No, I get that. But why the list? I could understand writing an actual article, but the list is pointless. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe someone sees my list and gets the drive to write an article; I have not the time to intensively research this, unfortunately. I'm only flabbergasted by the fact that everybody talks about starvation wages and nobody cares about defining this term (or is it merely political?) and it's not even in wikipedia!!! Alist could be a start, couldn't it?--Dudy001 (talk) 19:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not really; I'm gonna delete the list and stubify the article, as it really just isn't helpful. I'm gonna spend this weekend trying to create/expand some articles, and I think I'm gonna make this one the top of my list, so I guess in some respects it worked. :) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe you could use the list for ===see also=== and inner wiki links. Here is also a list on commons stamps which could color you life a bit.. Unfortunately I got stuck to the German section... as there are soooooo many stamps..Many deleted stuff are collected here: wikimannia or here: Marjorie-wiki--Dudy001 (talk) 20:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not really; I'm gonna delete the list and stubify the article, as it really just isn't helpful. I'm gonna spend this weekend trying to create/expand some articles, and I think I'm gonna make this one the top of my list, so I guess in some respects it worked. :) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe someone sees my list and gets the drive to write an article; I have not the time to intensively research this, unfortunately. I'm only flabbergasted by the fact that everybody talks about starvation wages and nobody cares about defining this term (or is it merely political?) and it's not even in wikipedia!!! Alist could be a start, couldn't it?--Dudy001 (talk) 19:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- No, I get that. But why the list? I could understand writing an actual article, but the list is pointless. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
The article Starvation wages has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unencyclopedic. Appears to be a saved Wikipedia search for the terms "starvation" and "wages".
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 03:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jade Record may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''Jade Record''' or '''Yuli''' (玉曆)<ref>[http://digital-beta.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/werkansicht/?PPN=PPN3308101645&LOGID=LOG_0003 玉歷鈔傳警世<
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Roy Kepler
[edit]Hello Dudy001,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Roy Kepler for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
TomCat4680 (talk) 21:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dudy001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dudy001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)