User talk:Duck You

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Duck You, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 03:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to UP Sigma Rho, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. The text you removed is well sourced and therefore verifiable. Please stop removing it. You have also violated the three revert rule and so another revert may lead to a block. If you wish to contest the validity of the sources, you may do so on the talk page. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 06:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to UP Sigma Rho, you will be blocked from editing. APK ^{yada yada} 06:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the three-revert rule on UP Sigma Rho. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. APK ^{yada yada} 06:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you're new and probably feel very strongly about this issue, but please stop edit warring and use the article talk page to develop consensus supporting your changes. If you have a good, reasonable point to make, your current behavior is only going to hold you back. This may be difficult to swallow, but really what the article displays right now is far less important than what it shows weeks or months down the road -- there is no deadline. It's much easier for all involved, in the long run, if things are resolved by discussion. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I regret doing this, it's clear you're going to keep ignoring the three revert rule until something catches your attention; since you've continued to revert despite clearly being well over three reverts in a 24-hour period, I've blocked this account from editing for 24 hours. This is not a punishment; the block will be released in 24 hours, or as soon as you can convince an administrator that you will stop edit warring. If you like, you can appeal this decision via the {{unblock}} template, but please be sure to address the reason for the block if doing so. Please take a moment to review our introduction to learn more about contributing to Wikipedia. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About UP Sigma Rho

I remove the References section because the references section is empty of footnotes and then in Wikipedia, if theres a empty section (unused section), should be deleted unless you add a footnotes. I have no wrongdoing for my edit.--Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suspected you that you delete the Related violence section of UP Sigma Rho and you are the one who violate the 3 revert rule.--Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The evidences are You delete Related violence section and UP Sigma Rho should not be biased by deleting the Related violence section.--Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 07:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to continue to edit in this website, you must be fair.--Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 07:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you delete the Related violence section. If you continue to delete Related violence section, I will blocked you from Wikipedia.--Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to add that you claim that only members of UP Sigma Rho are allowed to edit the article, which would be a violation to Wikipedia Conflict of Interest policy. Maybe what you can do is to provide the fraternity's statement regarding the deaths, with credible links and sources. Thanks! Starczamora (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on UP Sigma Rho. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding reversions[1] made on May 15 2008 to UP Sigma Rho

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]