User talk:DuaLipa99

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Summer Love (Justin Timberlake song) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Summer Love (Justin Timberlake song) was changed by DuaLipa99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869664 on 2018-08-28T12:15:07+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linus Wiklund (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NBAND and add information with references to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linus Wiklund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Linus Wiklund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DuaLipa99! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iggy Azalea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 23:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linus Wiklund (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still cites no sources, and still fails WP:NMUSIC as no verifiable claims to notability are made.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linus Wiklund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Linus Wiklund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at God is a woman, you may be blocked from editing.--DuaLipa99 (talk) 23:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 23:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DuaLipa99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here--DuaLipa99 (talk) 14:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:04, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DuaLipa99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Draft:Sandbox--DuaLipa99 (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what that means, but it does not address the instructions in the previous unblock request. Please note that repeated incoherent unblock requests can lead to the removal of your ability to edit this page. Kuru (talk) 13:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks because you're doing this all wrong, you'll never be unblocked at this rate. Good luck, - FlightTime (open channel) 13:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TPA

I suggest that TPA be removed due to improper use of the unblock request system, use is asking questions using the template and has not addressed their block at all.  - FlightTime (open channel) 14:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)File://localhost/Users/jordanandmax/Downloads/Wikipedia basics - Talk pages.ogv.480p.webm--DuaLipa99 (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi DuaLipa99! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:08, Thursday, August 30, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Nimbus, Nimbus

What Do You Mean? is a song performed by Jason Emke --DuaLipa99 (talk) 11:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIPEDIA and THE WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION present BOB AND ALICE

Hi I'm Bob And I'm Alice. We are editing the current revision of this page I am still editing Super Bass and I'm am still editing.--DuaLipa99 (talk) 21:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference: 01:15, 29 August 2018 Ronhjones (talk | contribs) blocked DuaLipa99 (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Vandalism-only account)

This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

01:15, 29 August 2018 Ronhjones (talk | contribs) blocked DuaLipa99 (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Vandalism-only account)--DuaLipa99 (talk) 23:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC) Ty Dollar Sign--DuaLipa99 (talk) 23:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]