User talk:Druseltal2005

Welcome!

Hello Druseltal2005, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Thank you for the picture at Pascal's triangle. I moved it down several paragraphs, as I was not sure it belongs in the introduction, but that can be discussed if necessary. One one style remark. I think it is better to write for example "matrix exponential" instead of "matrix-exponential" (I saw such wording in several places). Welcome! Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And I made some changes at Wieferich prime, just style. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

There is no reason to add ~~~~ in the edit summary box. It is not converted to a signature there. Your signature on talk pages should link to at least one of your user page, user talk page, or contributions page. See Wikipedia:Signatures#Internal links. You can for example check "Sign my name exactly as shown" and add this in the signature box at Special:Preferences: [[User:Druseltal2005|Gotti]]. It produces Gotti with a piped link to your real username so other editors can find you. You could also make [[User:Druseltal2005|Gotti]] ([[User talk:Druseltal2005|talk]]) to include a link to your talk page. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you test the signature with the talk link here on this talk page then talk will be bold unlinked text instead of a link. This is how the software treats links to the page itself. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:46, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super-root

As you have contributed to the article's talk page multiple times and seem to have enough knowledge on the subject to make a fair judgement on whether it's notable or not, you may have an opinion of its suggested merge with tetration. If you do please discuss it here, as the consensus currently seems to be in deadlock, and this is causing a large edit war across both articles. Robo37 (talk) 18:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi robo -

nice to get some comment. I just made a short msg in the tetration-talk-page. However, I'm not good in references; my love/attachment to math is that what wikipedians call the "original research". I just recall vaguely some readings about x^x and superroots(without that name) but only could find a mark concerning wexzal (which but seems not to be published, so will not fit as "reference").

Hope things go well -

Gottfried --Gotti 16:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

The discusion on the merge of Super-logarithm and Super-root to Tetration has been forwarded to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Merge of Super-logarithm and Super-root to Tetration and your name has been listed as part of the discusion

Feel free to join in with the discusion. Robo37 (talk) 20:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information - Gottfried--Gotti 10:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cesàro summation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia primegaps.png

I was looking at the nice graph File:Wikipedia primegaps.png and was wondering if you can add the sharpest proveable bounds (both upper and lower) to the image? If you can, I will wait on placing this image on the other pages, the ones with the conjectures. John W. Nicholson (talk) 22:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John - I'm sorry, I'm not "online" with primegaps at the moment; also I didn't have the respective estimated/proved bounds in my recherche in the internet. I'll see what I can do, perhaps a query in math.stackexchenge.com might help. In any case I would like it if you could do the recherche on yourself?

--Gotti 21:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=6ybvGHdBVVUDi1D_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_86re3dtWh5c8Ast&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Exp binomial 256 wiki.png

The file File:Exp binomial 256 wiki.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]