User talk:DrizzyDrakeFan

Welcome!

Hello, DrizzyDrakeFan and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 20:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page She Will has been reverted.
Your edit here to She Will was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Xls_H2FLJow , http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=K11asJmLXHw) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Drake (entertainer), you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

STOP Vandalizing GFID

STOP adding Made Men and that other fake track on the GFID page. They're not going to be on the album. I will report you if you keep doing that @#!*% RickyRozay (talk) 23:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plz stop Copy and Paste Moves

Do not move "Strange Clouds (song)". The article you keep moving it to will be the page for the upcoming album of the same name.

Cut and paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. 1Sire (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kanye West. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 05:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images

Please stop uploading larger versions of fair use images. Eeekster (talk) 02:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Young Money Entertainment

Category:Young Money Entertainment, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 02:45, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Take Care, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Take Care. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Tha Carter IV. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 03:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Take Care, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Dan56 (talk) 05:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Take Care, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Take Care, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Dan56 (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Jay-Z, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 22:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Sean. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. EPadmirateur (talk) 02:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Take Care. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 23:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you respond to some of these warnings being posted to your talk page. I mean, unconstructive edits will utlimately be reverted, and you might as well make a case for yourself, instead of against yourself. Dan56 (talk) 23:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you finally decided to use edit summary. As explained in the edit summaries to that article, lyrics sites are excluded as a rule of thumb for generally lacking copyright or having copyright issues (Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Article_body#External_links). Another editor proposed it as a site without such issues, but consensus must be found first, here. So, dont add it. Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent addition and removal of content to Take Care. Do not repeat this. It will be considered vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l

lists.wikimedia.org. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create malicious redirects, as you did with Do Right and Kill Everything. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 04:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Motto, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 06:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do Right and Kill Everything listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Do Right and Kill Everything. Since you had some involvement with the Do Right and Kill Everything redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Dan56 (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit to The Motto removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jawadreventon (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, like you did to The Motto, you may be blocked from editing. Jawadreventon (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, like you did to Drake (entertainer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jawadreventon (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image removal

Hi. Would mind commenting here? An editor has been unreasonable in removing an image in that article, so I have to be the one who finds consensus. Dan56 (talk) 02:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jawadreventon (talk) 21:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image from Look at Me Now music video

thumbnail|400px|right Jawadreventon (talk) 19:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acalamari 21:19, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kanye West, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. "Holy Trinity" edits. I should have you blocked from editing already. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 16:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 00:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What vandalism have I've done? I reverted all my religious edits. I'm the one who contributed and tidied up most of the Hip-Hop related articles. Just so you know. DrizzyDrakeFan 03:30, 6 May 2012‎ (UTC)

is this supposed to be an unblock request? Jawadreventon (talk) 22:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the 'unblock requests' category from this talk page, since there's no unblock template here. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've also reviewed your recent edits. You appear to think that you aren't vandalizing if you undo your own vandalism, but that's incorrect- you aren't allowed to vandalize Wikipedia, even if you do undo your edits. Edits like this are not acceptable. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:23, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Take Care, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't give you the right to remove it. You need to justify your removal like I did. There's no WP guideline or policy about the kind of user rights you're talking about. There's no article ownership. Respect my contributions, or you'll likely be blocked again if you continue this way. Dan56 (talk) 02:52, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Take Care, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 03:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drake (entertainer)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove content or templates from Wikipedia, like you did to Drake (entertainer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jawadreventon (talk) 20:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cruel Summer (GOOD Music album)

The article Cruel Summer (GOOD Music album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet criteria at WP:NALBUMS for unreleased material.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tgeairn (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cruel Summer (GOOD Music album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cruel Summer (GOOD Music album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruel Summer (GOOD Music album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tgeairn (talk) 02:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Drake (entertainer), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Look at our guidelines in reliable sources before claiming controversial information about a living person. The sources you are adding are not reliable sources, like a youtube link to a gossip source. Also see WP:OWN Secret ^account 01:24, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YOLO

I happened to notice you removed my bit of negative information regarding YOLO. Are you aware Wikipedia policy strives for neutral point-of-view? I'm only saying... ~ Octavannus-Caelestis 19:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Drake (entertainer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not remove content without an edit summary Jawadreventon (talk) 18:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC) Jawadreventon (talk) 18:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, DrizzyDrakeFan. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jawadreventon (talk) 18:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrizzyDrakeFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have made many good and reasonable contributions to Wikipedia. Look at the articles She Will and The Motto. DrizzyDrakeFan (talk) 06:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Doing good things does not excuse doing bad things - you need to address the edits that got you blocked, not the edits that didn't -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ambiguous block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrizzyDrakeFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been ambiguously blocked. I had no warnings and nothing pointed out. My last two blocks were from months ago. Someone is holding a grudge.

Decline reason:

Warnings are not a prerequisite for blocking, particularly when blocks have been previously issued for the same reasons. Further, I don't see why you would believe that removing referenced information, removing references, censoring words, and changing local spellings of words (all of which you did in these edits) would not be disruptive. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 21:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I see multiple warnings since your last block - they're up there ^. And how many blocks do you need before you start listening? The previous three should have been enough. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want this to be reviewed by an admin who will listen and consider. I didn't even get warned before the negligent third block. It's irrelevant. There is nothing wrong with my last edits.

If you've been blocked twice before for identical issues, and warned before each of those, it's a waste of time to try and warn you when you do the same thing again since you aren't heeding either the prior warnings or the blocks. There's a difference between ignorance of the law and blatant flouting thereof. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you'll want to read this guide before appealing again; neither of your last two appeals had anything to do with the stated reason for your block. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 21:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrizzyDrakeFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I've did remove a sentence bar but some things on articles are just repetitive and already linked. It's not like I intended to anger anyone. I discontinued before this negligent and ambiguous block. I organized a lot of articles and categories, tidied up references and attributed important information on Wikipedia. That's not a good reason to indefinitely block my account. I felt like I've been blocked unexpectedly.

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM. Note that warnings are not required before blocking. It's also obvious that you haven't listened to Hersfold's explanation as to why you were blocked. Please address the reasons for your block and explain how you will take measures to avoid a repeat of that behavior in any further unblock requests, without casting aspersons on the block reasoning or blockers. Note that continued spurious unblock requests may lead to your talk page access being revoked. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Several Wikipedia admins are too obstinate and close-minded. Did this person understood what I said? I've already addressed the reason for my block. As for explain how you will take measures to avoid a repeat of that behavior, All of my conflicted edits were resolved in the past.

Remember that other users can't see the intention in your heart. All they can see is the effect your edits have on the encyclopedia. A well-intentioned edit that is unhelpful and has to be corrected is exactly as disruptive as vandalism that has to be corrected- each takes the same amount of effort for someone else to fix. It's okay to just read the encyclopedia, without changing it. It doesn't make you a bad person, just a person who doesn't make edits on Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I Am Not a Human Being II for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Am Not a Human Being II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am Not a Human Being II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 22:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove feuds on Drake's article.

{{request edit}} I created this section back in 2012 and would like to have it removed. Pusha T's and Common's "feud" with Drake is minor and irrelevant.

Proof here that I made this section https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Drake_(rapper)&diff=prev&oldid=505504810

I would like to have it removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrizzyDrakeFan (talk • contribs) 08:37, 30 September 2015‎

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrizzyDrakeFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please delete these nonsense feuds on Drake's page I created out of boredom back in 2012. I'm not asking for a unblock because I know nobody wants me to edit Wikipedia. Please remove Pusha T, Meek Mill, Common and Chris Brown off Drake's page. My other account is HipHopVisionary and I got banned for removing my own irrelevant section that I wanted to remove. I tried making a consensus on Talk:Drake (rapper) but they thought I was vandalizing Wikipedia when I was trying to revert my own useless section from 2012 but they want to keep that dumb section I made because they don't me trust me because I'm banned and another user started a edit war with me. Please remove the feuds on Drake's page! Please. That's all I'm asking for.

Decline reason:

(1) Please don't abuse the unblock template when you are not requesting an unblock. If you do so again your talk page access is likely to be removed. (2) You don't own any part of any Wikipedia page, whether you wrote it or not: see WP:OWN. If you wish to keep control of what you write then post it to some other web site, not Wikipedia. Every time you edit here, you agree to release your writing to Wikipedia, after which you have no more "rights" to edit it than any other editor. (3) If you are blocked, that means that you are not allowed to edit articles: trying to evade the effect of the block by getting someone else to make your edits for you is unacceptable, and anyone who does so for you is likely to be blocked for meatpuppetry. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ways to improve Don't Get It Twisted (Lil Twist album)

Hi, I'm Robvanvee. DrizzyDrakeFan, thanks for creating Don't Get It Twisted (Lil Twist album)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. An orphan with no references that needs expansion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Rob van vee 17:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Don't Get It Twisted (Lil Twist album)

The article Don't Get It Twisted (Lil Twist album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable unreleased album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]