User talk:Dream Focus/whoops

Sometimes I make a mistake. *Gasp* Utter disbelief fills the crowd. Mostly this is just nonsense from automatic bots. Dream Focus 11:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chasing the Sunset

Notability of Chasing the Sunset

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Chasing the Sunset, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Chasing the Sunset is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Chasing the Sunset, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I messed up on that one. After www.trafficestimate.com failed to give me a reading for that webcomic's site, I went to alexa, and misread the information. I originally stated in the article it had 1.3 million hits in that time period, then erased it when I realized that number is the ranking, meaning there are 1.3 million sites more popular than it apparently, and it only has 800 to a thousand people at the most viewing on any given day. My mistake. If the articles and awards for it found on various sites I've reference aren't notable enough, then I won't bother objecting to its deletion. I really thought it had a lot more viewers than that when I created the wikipedia article about it. Dream Focus (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom, good intentions don't always work out

Arbcom Candidacy - Questions et al

Hey - I've formatted your discussion and question pages for the Arbcom Election. You might notice that the list of General Questions has also been posted to the Questions page; you'll want to answer those when you get a chance. Beyond that, please ping me with questions - and Good Luck! UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 00:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll look into that now. Dream Focus (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom questions

Hi. I'm Ral315, editor of the Wikipedia Signpost. We're interviewing all ArbCom candidates for an article this week, and your response is requested.

What positions do you hold (adminship, mediation, etc.), on this or other wikis?
Have you been involved in any arbitration cases? In what capacity?
Why are you running for the Arbitration Committee?
How do you feel the Arbitration Committee has handled cases and other situations over the last year? Can you provide an examples of situations where you feel the Committee handled a situation exceptionally well, and why? Any you feel they handled poorly, and why?
What is your opinion on confidentiality? If evidence is submitted privately to the Committee, would you share it with other parties in the case? Would you make a decision based on confidential information without making it public?
Why do you think users should vote for you?

Please respond on my talk page. We'll probably go to press on Tuesday, but late responses will be added as they're submitted. Thanks, Ral315 (talk) 10:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Xrifle1.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Xrifle1.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added in the paperwork, so its fine now. I believe it meets all requirements, as do the rest. Dream Focus (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:ZELDA OCARINA OF TIME 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ZELDA OCARINA OF TIME 2.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I had it listed for The Legend of Zelda instead of The Legend of Zelda (series). Dream Focus 09:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Barbarain II cover art.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Barbarain II cover art.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Dream Focus 03:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Super Cauldron.png

Thanks for uploading File:Super Cauldron.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. I thought clicking that it was the cover of a game's box was enough, but apparently you have to fill in the standard useless information. Dream Focus 03:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Trinity

Essentially all traditional christian religious groups, not just Catholics, believe that Jesus is God, though they express it in a rather complicated way--see the above article. The Unitarians don't , and this is their distinctive belief among Protestant groups. Just fyi, re God in Fiction. DGG (talk) 06:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, actually, I was raised a Methodist, and that's not how it works. Jesus is the son of God, but he is not God. You pray to God, not Jesus, they taught as two separate entities. Dream Focus 09:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it's time you re=read the first chapter of John. DGG (talk) 03:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Nanotechnology in fiction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Outer Limits, Replicators, Android and Knight Rider 2008

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Márquez

I noticed you voted "keep", citing as your rationale that Marquez was mayor. He was never mayor Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 21:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simple mistake. Scratched out my comment. Thanks for pointing that out to me. Dream Focus 21:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of female action heroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. When you recently edited Hylotheism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immaterial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Florence Colgate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florence Colgate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Colgate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 20:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

Account activation codes have been emailed.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
The 1-year, free period begins once you enter the code.
If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 04:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of magazines released by Marvel Comics in the 1970's

You'll need to request a history merger for attribution purposes. Also, the title would correctly be spelled "1970s", not "1970's". Sandstein 07:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When you moved it first to my user page, you didn't give me the history, which is rather odd. Anyway, do I request you do a history merge, do you just click something on your administrator tool bit, or do I post a request somewhere for that to happen? Dream Focus 10:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not very familiar with the process, but see WP:HISTMERGE for how to request it. I didn't restore the history because you only said you needed the information, not that you wanted to restore the article in another form. Sandstein 11:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I only needed the half of the article that was for the list, which no one was doubting or arguing to delete. I put the tag on top of the article to get it on the list of articles whose histories needed to be merged. [1] Dream Focus 11:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The BAP Handbook: The Official Guide to the Black American Princess

The article The BAP Handbook: The Official Guide to the Black American Princess has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodded of course. If there are two links in the reference section, both to major newspaper giving very ample coverage to this, then its notable. Dream Focus 10:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution IRC office hours.

Hello there. As you expressed interest in hearing updates to my research in the dispute resolution survey that was done a few months ago, I just wanted to let you know that I am hosting an IRC office hours session this coming Saturday, 28th July at 19:00 UTC (approximately 12 hours from now). This will be located in the #wikimedia-office ^connect IRC channel - if you have not participated in an IRC discussion before you can connect to IRC here.

Regards, User:Szhang (WMF) (talk) 07:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hi. I have reverted your recent edit to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, as you removed several other people's edits in the process. Please do re-add your comment, but please be careful not to remove or change any comments already present (I'd re-add your comment myself, but I don't know where it is intended to go in relation to the accidentally-deleted ones) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is odd. I wonder how that happened. Dream Focus 12:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen it happen occasionally due to a technical glitch, where the software doesn't properly detect an edit conflict - that's probably what happened here, I expect -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Florence Colgate

The article Florence Colgate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Transient news related BLP, no indication of long term significance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 20:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:TheLastoftheGreats.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TheLastoftheGreats.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Easily fixed. Notice you went and found an image of mine to prod for deletion after I complained about you mass prodding on your talk page. [2] Dream Focus 14:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Higher Earth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Higher Earth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher Earth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 02:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Before Watchmen Comedian issue one cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Before Watchmen Comedian issue one cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Before Watchmen Rorschach issue 1 cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Before Watchmen Rorschach issue 1 cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Before Watchmen Dr Manhattan cover of issue 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Before Watchmen Dr Manhattan cover of issue 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MMOsite

The article MMOsite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable web site (but does not qualify for CSD a7)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MASEM (t) 15:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MMOsite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MMOsite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMOsite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MASEM (t) 15:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Green Wake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Green Wake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Wake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Colony (U.S. season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Body Language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spirulina (genus), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited The Family Fang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ecco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Planetary Annihilation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supreme Commander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Dream Focus. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 01:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just responded to it. Hope the message is gotten across by those with open minds and the determination to make things happen. Dream Focus 02:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coolture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coolture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coolture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Pizza cheese

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pizza cheese. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

You are getting this notice because you commented on the result of the AfD at the closing admin's page p b p 19:45, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Joseph Louis Lagrange

Category:Joseph Louis Lagrange, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom appeal

I've appealed the restrictions on that article. Tijfo098 (talk) 19:46, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DF...

Hello, Dream Focus. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 10:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]