User talk:Drcwright

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:180px-Karakuwa-Miyagi.png

Thanks for uploading Image:180px-Karakuwa-Miyagi.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:YorkLogo50px.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:YorkLogo50px.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Durin 22:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:YorkLogo48px.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:YorkLogo48px.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Durin 22:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sizing of images

Dcwright; you do not need to upload various versions of an image to get different sizes. The Wikimedia software has support for resizing an image. Look at the code that I am typing here to see examples. Visually, you'll see the difference in size between these two images, but they are the same image...I'm just asking the Wikimedia software to resize. Observe:

File:USNavyBandLogo.jpg

Hope this helps, --Durin 22:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned images

Drcwright; fair use images must be used in the main article namespace or they are considered orphaned. The main article namespace is comprised of actual encyclopedia articles. Userboxes, userpages, templates, categories, and etc. do not count towards this requirement. Further, fair use images may not be used on userboxes, userpages, templates, etc. Please do not remove the orphaned fair use tags from images until you have verified they are used in actual articles. If you have any questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. Thank you, --Durin 23:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:YorkLogo50px.gif

The page I see states that it is fair use of a logo "to illustrate the organization, item, or event in question". Does it need to be in an article? It currently being used in the YorkU userbox for student and alumni of York University, and I think that should be sufficient.

Regarding Image:YorkLogo48px.gif -- I didn't like the quality so I redid it (Image:YorkLogo50px.jpg) with plans to delete it (~48px.gif).

Oh. I don't see how all the images in those userboxes are in a main article. I'll look into it though. Thanks. Drcwright 23:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images are not permitted on userboxes, period. At any given moment, there are userboxes that have fair use images on them in violation of policy. Myself and a number of other editors attempt to police this. --Durin 23:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious as to why this Queen's logo is not considered orphaned. It is only on user and template pages.
Image:UsermadeQueen's.png —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drcwright (talk • contribs)

Because it's not tagged with a fair use license, but a free license. In this case, {{PD-self}} --Durin 23:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhh. I thought that because this represented York's logo, I had to tag it as a logo. I added the text and used 2 different images in Photoshop to make the logo. Do I thus change the license to "free"? Drcwright 23:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay... no matter. That was the wrong one too. I've added a new one Image:YorkLogoMotto.png under a free license.

Forgive me but I think I may not have conveyed the point. The logos must be tagged as logos because they are copyrighted works. We can not free them of copyrights just by tagging them under a free license. We have to gain specific release of rights from the copyright holder for that.
With regards to Image:YorkLogoMotto.png, that is a derivative work, combining the copyrighted images Image:Yorkucrest.gif and http://www.yorku.ca/alumni/images/yorkheader.gif. Yes, some of your creativity went into making it. York University however retains rights to the graphic. I'm sorry. I've retagged the image as {{logo}}, removed it from the userbox, and labeled it as orphaned. --Durin 03:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Shit. Thanks. I've got it now. Although, I think it's silly that a logo can't be used for a userbox when that logo clearly defines the membership of the userbox.

Drcwright, you've once again added a fair use image to the York U userbox. This time, it was Image:Yorkucrest.gif. Could I ask you to please query me on my talk page before adding another image to that userbox? I've tried to communicate to you the nature of these images and how to avoid using them but apparently I'm not getting the message across. Perhaps if you just asked me directly I could tell you, before you put another fair use image on the userbox in violation of our policy. Ok? --Durin 18:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK... I was thinking only "fair use" images that are used in an article could be used for userboxes. Re-reading your above notes, I see it was pretty clear. Got it. (For real this time.)
I've uploaded . Left note on your talk page. Will wait to hear from you before using.

RE:Battle of Nanj[k]ing

Hardly the main contributor.

It's a romanization issue. We haven't really decided on whether to use WG or Pinyin for these types of articles. -- 我♥中國 03:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LucieBlackman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LucieBlackman.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mama-san

Hi. I browsed through the history of hostess bar, and your name comes up fairly often, so I figured it's safe to assume you have some knowledge/interest in the more Japanese side of nightlife in Japan. The reason I decided to contact you is this: if you should have some knowledge of the whole mama-san thing, could you look into the article? It's in a terrible state as it is - it's been started out with the assumption that mama-san implies to female pimps in Thailand, and while this may be true it's blown out of proportions in the article. For comparison, the German article is way more apropriate - it describes your typical motherly snack bar mastress who pours drinks for sarariman, listens to their complaints and pats them on the shoulders because their bosses don't. Sarariman aren't even mentioned in the English article. If you have no time for or interest in this article, I'll probably eventually just translate the German article. TomorrowTime 02:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got your reply. Same here about the job - just got a new one. Funny thing, jobs. You have so much less time on your hands...

Anyway, how about we do a collaboration? I translate the German article into a sandbox somewhere and then you can go through it and add whatever info you've got? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TomorrowTime (talk • contribs) 08:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

sounds good. now i gotta get back to work! lol. Drcwright 05:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ping!

Hi Drcwright,
The link above may now be old news to you, but I found myself responding anyhow! Best wishes, David Kernow (talk)

Image:MaebashiCityEmblem.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MaebashiCityEmblem.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Conscious 15:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Japan taskforces

In order to encourage more participation, and to help people find a specific area in which they are more able to help out, we have organized taskforces at WikiProject Japan. Please visit the Participants page and update the list with the taskforces in which you wish to participate. Links to all the taskforces are found at the top of the list of participants.

Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for helping out! ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 08:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining to Talk:Niki fischer the difference between "popular" and "notable" -- best laugh I've had in a while!! You made my day. Not only that, I found out about the page where we Canucks make ourselves known to each other through your userpage. Arigato! Accounting4Taste 05:28, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AlmostTransparentBlue1stEngTradePaperback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlmostTransparentBlue1stEngTradePaperback.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Minerva Networks

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Minerva Networks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:KiryuCityEmblem.png

Thanks for uploading Image:KiryuCityEmblem.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty of fish

I looked again, and although there are tagged issues, I don't think it's really a candidate for speedy deletion, so I've restored it. Other admins may take a different view, so if you could address some of the issues, that would help. Do not remove the tags until you have done so jimfbleak (talk) 09:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:UnitedRedArmy.MoviePoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:UnitedRedArmy.MoviePoster.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kuwahara (Bicycles)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kuwahara (Bicycles), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dreamgate.ne.jp/kuwahara/history/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SFU userbox

At the time, the userbox contained the file File:SFU crest.png, which was (and still is) a non-free logo, and therefore couldn't be used outside articlespace. The new image you've used is of course fine. Black Kite 06:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

William Saito

I notice that you seem to have flagged this article on William Saito as being too much like a resume. In your opinion, what changes would be needed to make it less resume-like and for this comment to be removed? Hughashton (talk) 04:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fairly obvious. Remove the long lists of awards and past positions... or articles that he is referenced in? Look at Jack Welch's page for an example.

I'm the person who did the major overhaul of the article in question, and I'd also like to get some specifics from you on what needs to be changed before I get started on the revision. (I've got a pretty good idea already, but would like to address your concerns in a comprehensive fashion.) Thanks! Djtokyo55 (talk) 02:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC) (see above)[reply]

Tokyo meetup

Interested in attending a Tokyo Wikipedia Meetup?
If you are interested in a Tokyo meetup, please visit Wikipedia:Meetup/Tokyo and voice your interest. Not in the Tokyo area? Check out other meetups around the world!

--Saki ^talk 06:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AQuantive

The article AQuantive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page contains little or no information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LES 953 (talk) 21:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AQuantive

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AQuantive requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LES 953 (talk) 01:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AQuantive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AQuantive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AQuantive until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LES 953 (talk) 02:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KiryuCityEmblem.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KiryuCityEmblem.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Drcwright. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just dropping by to say hi to a fellow Wikipedian in Japan that also went to SFU. Alex Shih ^Talk 08:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I'm just dropping in with a very belated reply! It's been a busy year. ;) Drcwright (talk) 05:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Drcwright. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drcwright. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drcwright. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Thomas d'Aquino

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Thomas d'Aquino, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://thebusinesscouncil.ca/publications/beyond-free-trade-a-canada-united-states-partnership-for-security-and-prosperity-an-address-by-thomas-daquino/ (dated 3 March 2005), and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Thomas d'Aquino and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Thomas d'Aquino, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Thomas d'Aquino. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Thomas d'Aquino with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Thomas d'Aquino saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 305 (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 305 (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/305 (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 16:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:HostBar.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HostBar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]