User talk:Dragong4

It is suspected or confirmed that this user has used one or more sock puppets for abuse, libel, or ban evasion.
See block log, list of suspected puppets and list of confirmed puppets.
The use of abusive sock puppets on Wikipedia is prohibited; use of sock puppets
to evade bans results in the ban timer being reset and may further lengthen it.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ~ Hibana 23:55, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page Tina Wood. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Elwood00 ^{T | C} 04:13, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Academic Challenger 03:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 03:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Talk:Jesuit High School (Portland, Oregon), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 20:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity articles

Please don't create articles about yourself or your friends. We're building an encyclopedia here, and it's very unlikely that your article fits in with that. Creating such articles also makes work for others as we rush to delete them. The Wikipedia policy on vanity articles can be reviewed here and here and the reason your article was deleted can be reviewed here. If you have any questions or need any help, please contact me. Thanks.➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 19:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours for vandalism. If you are prepared to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, you may return when the block expires. Thanks. ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 19:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email about block

Thank you for your email. I understand about your little brother gaining control of your account and then vandalising articles. Did this also occur on 27 Nov 2005, 28 Nov 2005, 25 Feb 2006 and 16 Mar 2006?

If so, I would suggest you change your password. I'm not inclined to lift the block, which will expire after 24 hours anyway, due to the persistant allegations of vandalism by this account.

You are welcome to come back and contribute constructively to our encyclopedia once the ban expires, but if your little brother or anyone else gains control of the account again and starts vandalising articles, this account will be blocked from editing again, and next time it will like as not be for a longer period. Thanks. ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 10:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emails

Hi Dragong4. I have had a couple of emails that appear to have come from you requesting to be unblocked. As far as I can see, you were only blocked for 24 hours, and that block expired on the 29th. Also you have edited since the block expired (but before you emailed me), so I am a bit confused. Can you clarify? Thanks TigerShark 13:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for vandalism. We have better things to do than go around deleting articles like Make a billy rancher article, Billy rancher and the unreal gods and Billy rancher please. Snottygobble 04:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I received an email from the user of this account, who claimed that he was innocent of vandalism. He stated that the vandalism had been conducted by his little brother, who had logged onto his account while he was on the phone to a friend. I have examined this account's contributions, and it must have been a very long phone call because virtually every edit to the main space is blatant vandalism since the account was opened last November. I'm extending this ban to one month, based on the deceptive email and my realisation of just how extensive and ongoing the vandalism has been. Snottygobble 07:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities

You removed an NPOV tag from this article without any discussion or edit summary. If you think that this tag is not appropriate for the article, please discuss at the talk page for this article. Thanks, Deville (Talk) 18:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

You still don't seem to have grasped what Wikipedia is about. This is an encyclopedia, not a chat forum or a play ground. Please try to respect our culture or you'll likely find yourself blocked again. --kingboyk 19:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For renewed vandalism and a personal attack, you have been blocked for 6 months. Don't say you weren't given ample warning. If you wish to use Wikipedia properly you can contact me and ask for an unblocking in no less than one month. --kingboyk 07:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Pursuant to your email request I've unblocked you. Please change your password as promised and ensure your account is used for good editing only this time! :) --kingboyk 08:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. If I see anything like this again you will be blocked indefinitely - Glen 07:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Atlantic Records

Your recent edit to Atlantic Records (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dragong4 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dancter 21:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You were reported to WP:AIV and then blocked for 24 hours for unnecessary comments on the talk pages of the Village Pump and North Korea. I see that you have been blocked several times before, so I am about to begin a report on WP:AN/I to discuss your future on Wikipedia. Academic Challenger 06:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yawn

Re: this edit of yours - Yawning means different things in different countries - please don't erase information just because you disagree with it. Also, please be polite, mature, and calm in your edit summaries. Thanks. --Quiddity 22:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

stop attacking

you need to stop attacking people. I removed the reviews that weren't big ones. I wasn't trying to ruin the page. Scepia 06:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:PhotoLennon 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PhotoLennon 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Oklahoma Prep Sports

Your recent edit to Oklahoma Prep Sports (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 04:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been restarted due to the sockpuppetry through Zabrak (talk · contribs). -- tariqabjotu 04:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:PhotoLennon 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PhotoLennon 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 07:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]