User talk:Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra

Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to SU(6) (physics), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 21:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:NewenergysourcesSU 6 SU 12 . (1)

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:NewenergysourcesSU 6 SU 12 . (1), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Human is a Miniature of Universe (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a journal publication.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A Human is a Miniature of Universe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A Human is a Miniature of Universe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:A Human is a Miniature of Universe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:A Human is a Miniature of Universe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Train of Knowledge (talk) 06:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1027

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1027 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Creation of a non-sequitir archive page by a user by mistake. I've put a copy on the user's talk page so they can post it appropriately.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 22:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We need to extend the Einstein's Theory of General Relativity?

According to Einstein's GRT, the real time can not defined out side the gravitating sphere. Again from GRT it was shown that the volume of all galaxies once been squized in zero volume, what happened after then? I think the universe is then changes to another phase with the help of the latent energy SU(6). Thus it may considered that the space time of the Wider Universe actually complex space time as explained details in my articles. Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra (talk) 13:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've copied the above here from Wikipedia talk:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1027, which I've tagged for deletion. Archive pages are created, generally by bots, to archive the contents of high-volume talk pages; they should not be edited by users. If you have a question (like the above), please post it to the WP:Teahouse. Thanks. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 22:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I look at the question, the correct place for it would be the talk page of one of the related articles, like Talk:Theory of relativity. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 22:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra! You created a thread called All kind of empty space are filled with new energy sources SU(6), SU(12), SU(24)...... etc. as explained details in my articles. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Origin of consciousness and contemporary physics

Hello, Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Origin of consciousness and contemporary physics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]