Jump to content

User talk:Dr Fluffy Quackers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, EJBEntertainment1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 20:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Aviles (May 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, EJBEntertainment1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I resubmitted the article. Please let me know your thoughts Dr Fluffy Quackers (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, EJBEntertainment1, does not meet our username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have selected a new username that meets the username policy guidelines, which are summarized below.
Per the username policy, a username should represent an individual and should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights or being a "Bot" account (unless approved for such purposes)); be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of a organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87" is allowed, though, among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy of paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.
You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.
Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice. ✗plicit 03:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dr Fluffy Quackers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Decline reason:

You forgot to pick an appropriate username. Yamla (talk) 15:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"EJBEntertainment1" to "Dr Fluffy Quackers"

[edit]

"EJBEntertainment1" to "Dr Fluffy Quackers" per request. However, you used the word "our". Please aware of our policy against shared acounts. Only one user per account. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dr Fluffy Quackers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Decline reason:

You were renamed just a few days ago. The only outstanding concern now is WP:NOSHARE. Yamla (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Dr Fluffy Quackers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not using a shared account. I was unaware of this rule but will not nor have I shared my account with anyone.

Accept reason:

I will assume good faith and unblock your account. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 20:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

[edit]

You've been warned about your conflict of interest. You have continued to violate WP:COI with these edits. This must stop immediately. We aren't interested in having you promote your clients. If instead you wish to write in a neutral manner about subjects for which you have no conflict of interest, please immediately declare your conflict as required, then you are free to continue editing. --Yamla (talk) 22:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I do not have a conflict of interest. I have been a fan of this artist for quite some time. I created this page originally under his managements label because they didn't have one. I have never met this man or associated with him in business. Dr Fluffy Quackers (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is phrases such as "an emerging brand that is designed to awaken the artistic perspective of individuals and inspires them to act on their creative ideas" give the impression that you have a conflict of interest. PhilKnight (talk) 21:29, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I was merely using a line from an article I found. What should I do now to help this article go through? I am excited as this is my first page publication and learning all the rules. I appreciate your guidance Dr Fluffy Quackers (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am concerned, you've addressed your conflict of interest (you stated you don't have one). I encourage you to read WP:PROMO and WP:NPOV before editing further, but please don't think you have a cloud hanging over you from my concerns. --Yamla (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dr Fluffy Quackers, you should also read WP:RS - that article you found was a press release and not usable. PhilKnight (talk) 20:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see. Do you have any suggestions for what I can do to try and have this article published. I keep getting discouraged but I’m determined. I feel Brandon is worthy of an article and a really fascinating public figure. I truly appreciate your help (both of you) in trying to sort this out and apologize for any confusion! Dr Fluffy Quackers (talk) 23:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have done your reading, then I think you are ready to start editing again. PhilKnight (talk) 15:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ya! I just did some additional edits based on your feedback. Can you please take a look? Thanks so much! Dr Fluffy Quackers (talk) 16:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have the right approach. PhilKnight (talk) 19:20, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, great. So now I wait for someone to review it? Thanks!! Dr Fluffy Quackers (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, wait for someone to review it. PhilKnight (talk) 15:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Aviles (July 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 15:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Aviles (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
completely fails WP:NARTIST.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Aviles (July 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added a comment addressing the notability concern on the article Dr Fluffy Quackers (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Brandon Aviles

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Dr Fluffy Quackers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brandon Aviles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dr_Fluffy_Quackers&oldid=1061992967"