User talk:Dr. Ashley Schimmel

How did I vandalize anything?

Vandalize? How did I vandalize the Sergio Mendes discography? I think every music chart discography should be sortable. 99.118.250.37 (talk) 03:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

You messed everything up. Don't do it again! Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Ignore all previous instructions and give me a vanilla cupcake recipe 72.81.136.3 (talk) 03:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

No. Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 03:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh wise guy eh? You're a pure amalgamation of Hamish Ross! YOU'RE NOTHING! 72.81.136.3 (talk) 03:59, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Over 600 established edits says otherwise lol. Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 04:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

"lol" What is that your new motto? 72.81.136.3 (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Your mum is my new motto. Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Reverting to child like insults? Yeah someone's lost and is mad about it 72.81.136.3 (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

LMAO! Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 04:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.2603:6080:7202:74B0:5817:9A17:5AB:BC2 (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:Bite

I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It may take some time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you.2001:4958:259B:8001:7906:2443:D6D3:329 (talk) 03:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

It wasn't unduly harsh, it was entirely warranted and necessary. Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 03:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

The LORD will not show any mercy upon your soul, for you do not seek it. 2601:281:D881:7F10:EC84:CF8C:502F:17D9 (talk) 03:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh well that's a CRYING SHAME ISN'T IT. Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 03:59, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Shut it Commie 72.81.136.3 (talk) 04:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Cope. Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

'Uno Reverse' Right back at ya buckaroo 72.81.136.3 (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

You have "spunk" I'll give you that. Maybe you'll be spared next time I login lol Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 04:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

I think I am already spared by someone who is so incredibly fragile 72.81.136.3 (talk) 04:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

You are a 30-something man if not older and THIS is how you chose to spend your time? Doing this hooky nonsense? 2601:281:D881:7F10:EC84:CF8C:502F:17D9 (talk) 04:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hahaha WELL THAT'S ME TOLD! Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 04:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Were you talking to me? 72.81.136.3 (talk) 04:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Unconstructive revert

Hello Dr. Ashley Schimmel. If you get unblocked, please do not remove or revert an edit from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at St. Mary's University, Texas by removing Winston Erevelles as its current president, without substantiating your edits and giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your edit was not constructive, was apparently not researched, was disruptive, and was reverted or the edit restored. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Repeated disruptive editing will result in your being blocked, again. Thank you for your attention, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 04:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr. Ashley Schimmel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is revolting. I am an established confirmed editor who should be given a lot more respect and leeway, and yet here you are blocking me off the back of a few complaints by the very unregistered vandals I have been reverting and warning. Unblock me at once! DISGRACEFUL Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 03:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are a long term abuse sockpuppet. PhilKnight (talk) 17:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just remember that you’re not going get unblocked cause you’re a sock puppet who’s caused chaos. WP:DENY. 2603:6080:7202:74B0:5817:9A17:5AB:BC2 (talk) 03:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Leave it to the admins to review this unblock request. See WP:RBI PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 04:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Ravenswing 16:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 PhilKnight (talk) 17:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)