User talk:Dr.Rezowan

This is Dr.Rezowan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Md. Rezowan Ahmed (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the references are primary sources and fail as reliable sources and need to be replaced with references from newspapers, etc. You should also look at WP:COI as your username indicates that you may have some association with the subject of the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Md. Rezowan Ahmed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Md. Rezowan Ahmed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr.Rezowan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 09:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Md. Rezowan Ahmed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Md. Rezowan Ahmed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 20:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Md. Rezowan Ahmed is a popular author, can't I write about him and his contribution to the book & music industry? Dr.Rezowan (talk) 16:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bdembassyusa.org/?page=father-of-the-nation. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justi yaya 02:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I edit or recreate my article with appropriate documentation? Dr.Rezowan (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I'm waiting for your reply Sir/Ma'am Dr.Rezowan (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of bdembassyusa.org/?page=father-of-the-nation. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Md. Rezowan Ahmed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Md. Rezowan Ahmed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why my account blocked I just don't know. I provide all the contributions in the articles with solid sources. If you guys think it is the wrong info then let me or just search in google about it. You just claim that I'm advertising or something else. I'm an author and writer, I know the value of Wikipedia & I won't write here any unusual or unpreferable things here. So I humbly request to unblock my account. Thank you. Dr.Rezowan (talk) 20:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand what was wrong with your edits. Yamla (talk) 20:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I gave a solid news source about my edits, what was wrong with it? Can you clarify? I want to work on Wikipedia, what should I do now? Dr.Rezowan (talk) 20:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. We also don't get to promote our own books on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm paid to write about those items, those books aren't mine. Dr.Rezowan (talk) 13:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This makes things worse, as your username is now improper(since you are not Dr. Rezowan) and you will need to tell us a new username this account can be renamed to- and you are admitting to undisclosed paid editing in violation of WP:PAID. Clearly you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia at this time, not until you better understand the relevant policies. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wiki allowed the paid edits rights? Then what's the problem with my edits then. Cause I didn't publish any wrong thing. All are sourced from international news and press releases. Moreover "The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure." book is a top-rated book in Bangladesh, it describes the contributions of the national father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and has written just an article about it with all proper information, it's not under any promotion or advertisement. Dr.Rezowan (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Paid editing is only allowed if you disclose your employer, and client. See WP:PAID. Your edits were considered promotional by multiple admins, so you need to commit to change your edits. You have not proposed a new username. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Any wrong thing?

You mean aside form promotional edits and WP:COPYVIO's -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:42, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Where can I appeal for my username change? I wanna work on Wikipedia so I have to unblock myself; can anyone help me out, please?

Decline reason:

If you want to request a different username, I or another can execute that for you. However, given that you still haven't demonstrated an understanding of why you were blocked, then it will be unlikely for you to be unblocked at all and I, at least, would not unblock you to be a paid editor - a nature that has various additional rules. For example, when you made your current account, you agreed to a terms of use document with a specific set of restrictions on paid editing, and have been breaching them all this time. These two issues together make us nervous that you would manage to comply with all the core rules should you be unblocked. In normal practice, I'd advise any unblocking admin to not unblock without a prohibition for paid editing until the editor had demonstrated an ability to source correctly. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See and read the details at Wikipedia:Changing username, then make your request here. Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your username has to meet the username policy. Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]