User talk:Dovea

Welcome!

Hello, Dovea, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ellis kev 16:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hello, I see you have created several articles on British MPs recently but none of them cite their sources. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information. KFP 17:54, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On all those MP articles

All those MP articles are fine, and its good to see you are starting to add the source. I assume you are not just copying the text. Just a couple of points. Can you expand the citation to the style in WP:CITE, it would look like

Smith, J. How to cite your sources, Random House, 2005. ISBN 1607000X

Please find the subjects usual form of address and use that as the title of the article, rather than the full name, something like the Angela Knight page. Likewise, wikilinks and categories are nice. It is just so much easier for you to add things in at creation than it is later. Anyway, great stuff, and good wiki'ing! Mr Stephen 18:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In realtion to the UK MP articles. Please consider using an appropriate stub tag, also Wikilinking to the relavnt parties and constituences would be very much appreicated. :-) ShakespeareFan00 14:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Hughes

Hi, Dovea, I (massively) expanded your stub on Roy Hughes. Let me know what you think, especially as I am not British and therefore might have misunderstood some crucial detail. I decided to expand the list because I had read his obituary in the Daily Telegraph. I reccomend those obits much more than the obits for the Guardian or the Times. Cheers V. Joe 09:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cross References

In the text of articles, please put in cross-references wherever meaningful, eg for ministerial positions, the main towns in constituency names, years, including birth years and death years, any people mentioned, etc, etc. You may also wish to add relevant categories. Also note that WP articles normally mark up in bold the first mention in the main text of the article's subject. Compare, eg this page for Archie Hamilton, for a fully 'wikified' entry.

But thanks for all the work you're doing on these very useful articles! -- Jheald 20:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Ditto Jhead's comment above. Thanks. --Richhoncho 11:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure those sending the above messages will appreciate I am a new Wikipedian and still need to familiarise myself with many of the things you are asking me to do - I am still learning. Thank you for your patience. Dovea 18/6/06

For a pointer, why don't you have a look at the changes made subsequent to you starting the new page Angela Rumbold? All the tools you need are at the top of the posting box. The more linkage the more use the article. --Richhoncho 19:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Layout of articles

Hi, I noticed that you have created quite a lot of articles of various polticians - good work. But, it would be great if you could Wikify them and provide Categories - thus making it easier for folk browsing the encyclopedia to find them. Forbsey 17:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still more on MP stubs..

Some suggestions.

Please use a {{UK-MP-stub-tag}}, it helps other editors find the articles.

Also please consider when adding constituency details to add them as for example [[Brent South (UK Parlimentary constituency)|Brent South]], as in some locations the place and the constituency are not synonomus..

Thanks User:ShakespeareFan00 07:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

double article

Where's the other article about Graham Page?--Kchase02 T 11:32, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Under Rodney Graham Page. --Dovea 17:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, someone's put up merge tags. Do you know which name he's better known as?--Kchase02 T 19:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Graham Page. --Dovea 16:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linking articles

At Talk:MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 1983 you mention that you are not sure how to link articles. There's an explanation at Wikipedia:Piped link, but basically where you would normally just put the name of the page between the double square brackets you instead put the real name of the page followed by a | followed by the name to display. Hard to explain in words, but have a look at the changes I've made to your Frank McElhone page to create links to the constituency articles such as Glasgow Gorbals. It'll soon become second nature--George Burgess 18:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks George. --Dovea 16:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal Democrat

Well done for your work on British MPs. I have been going through them and tidying up, adding categories and links. One thing that I've noticed is that you have consistently referred to SDP defectors and Liberals as now being Liberal Democrat politicians, yet your references are all pre-1988. Unless you have clear evidence of them playing an active role in the Lib Dems after they left parliament, I suggest you don't infer - they may have re-joined Labour or stayed in the continuing SDP or Liberals, or dropped out altogether.

Incidentally, you may find it helpful to take a tidied article and use it as a template for new ones - you can just change the names, dates and parties in many cases. That would help you create better articles in the first place that can be more easily found by other editors working on MPs. I have a footer template I am using at User:Mtiedemann/Useful items and you could consider creating something similar for your own work.

Well done again, Mtiedemann 17:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I have Times 1929 to 1955, and 1966, so have been adding occasionally. Except for the 1966 book, they miss things like forenames and personal details, so not as useful for a full article. I would be very grateful for the info on Idris Owen from the 1974 books, as he was a friend of my mother. Perhaps you can type it out on my talk page for me, or send it to my email using the link, or expand the article. It would be much appreciated. I'm also interested in Labour Co-operative MPs; I've seen you've flagged a few of those already and it would be helpful to know if you have been doing that each time so that I can add them to the list at List of Labour Co-operative Members of Parliament. Again, thanks and well done, Martín (saying/doing) 19:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

William Hamling

Thank you for updating William Hamling: it's appreciated. Nunquam Dormio 21:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Dovea 10:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MPs by Parliament

I have made a suggestion for how to categorise MPs by Parliament: see Category talk:British_MPs#MPs_by_Parliament, and would welcome your comments. --BrownHairedGirl 21:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And that category system has now been nominated for deletion. See CFD for category:MPs of the United Kingdom House of Commons, by Parliament and subcategories. Your comments would be welcome. --BrownHairedGirl 17:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Willie Hamilton

You made an edit to this article stating he came 3rd in South Hams. Do you have a citation for this? It seems odd as South Hams is a district council, not a constituency. Catchpole 21:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It´s on Times Guide to the House of Commons 1987. It was a constituency before the 1997 boundary changes. --Dovea 16:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Supporters of the British Conservative Party

Hi - I hope this finds you well! Just a polite note of caution re your addition of a category called Supporters of the British Conservative Party. I can see where you are trying to come from, but what constitutes a supporter of the British Conservative party? Have they: made a speach; donated money (if so, how much); carry a membership card; come out and said "I'm a conservative" - all of the above and more? And what happens if they then come out later and reverse one/all of the criteria and support someone else? Also, wouldn't all the other parties also need such a category if you could define what "membership" was? Such undefined criteria lead to the categories often being removed as being unencyclopedic, as its difficult/impossible to define clearly who fits in. I hope you can define this/reference all against the criteria before you go through a lot of work. Best Regards, - Trident13 16:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. The fact that those people are/were Conservatives is in fact mentioned already in the texts of the articles relating to them. I'll also point out that I've acknowledged some of them are former supporters, as the category includes former supporters (including deceased ones). Sir John Mills, for example, has supported both the Tories and Labour. I have also done the same for Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the SNP and Plaid Cymru. --Dovea 16:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dovea, as per Trident13's note above, I'm afraid that this category is just too ill-defined to be useful, and that the same applies to its equivalents for the other parties.

I have therefore nominated all three categories for deletion.
See: CFD for Supporters of the British Liberal Democrats. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 18:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops! I mean all five categories. I had missed out Category:Supporters of Plaid Cymru and Category:Supporters of the Scottish National Party. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)}

Thanks, BrownHairedGirl. Not all users have the courtesy to inform creators of categories that their categories are up for deletion. I have of course added a keep comment but I won't be creating a category again - I'm having no luck with them and I will from now on stick to creating political articles. Dovea 18:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Living Centenarians

Greetings, I don't think it's a good idea to put persons 110+ in the category 'living centenarians.' First off, they are already in their elite category, 'supercentenarians' (persons 110+). Putting them into 'centenarians' is like listing Roger Clemens as a 'living minor league ball player.' Sure, he played minor league baseball, but is that what he is really known for? How about 'major league Hall of Famer' instead.

→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 20:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that feedback, but I haven't actually done that myself. --Dovea 20:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested in more 'survivors of the 19th century,' check this page out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surviving_veterans_of_World_War_I

→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 01:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Dovea 10:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I created Surviving silent film actors. My original idea back in January was for the thing to be a list, but I switched to categories as they had been preferred. I'm hoping this will be safe due to the article Surviving veterans of World War I being okay. I know you might be annoyed with me CfDing the cat, but like I said I figured it was soon to be chopped anyway.--T. Anthony 13:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not annoyed with you at all, T.Anthony. It's the policy that should be changed: I've added my thoughts on this issue on the Categories for discussion page. Dovea 19:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Page

Hi, only a little information. I have merged Derek Page (the stub you had created) into Derek Page, Baron Whaddon. Best wishes ~~ Phoe _talk 17:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC) ~~ [reply]

Good, thanks. Dovea 18:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

link to British

Hello. Thank you for your recent edit to James MacColl and William Griffiths (politician). Your edit included one or more links to the page British, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising links to British to refer directly to the most relevant topic such as United Kingdom by typing [[United Kingdom|British]]. Regards, -- Jeff3000 16:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks Jeff. Dovea 19:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New stub articles on MPs

Hi Dovea

Well done ceating all those new articles on MPs. However, I hope you will excuse me for pointing out a few things which you could improve:

Please link to the constituency article: It's easy to do so: every constituency is named with the suffix "(UK Parliament constituency)". So if you want to link to Banffshire, just type [[Banffshire (UK Parliament constituency)|]]. (There's a handy trick there: if you have an article name which ends with something in parentheses, then if you put a "|" after it wikipedia automatically completes the link by adding the first part of the name, like this: [[Banffshire (UK Parliament constituency)|]] ... which appears as Banffshire.
This is a really imprtant thing to do, because it helps to trace the article by using whatlinks here (see for example: Whatlinkshere:Banffshire (UK Parliament constituency): William Duthie doesn't link there, so he's not listed.

Use the correct stub: It's great that you have been adding the {{UK-MP-stub}} template, but it's much better to use the party-specific stub: {{Conservative-UK-MP-stub}}, {{Labour-UK-MP-stub}} or {{Liberal-UK-MP-stub}} (the Liberal one obviously only for Liberals, not Liberal Democrats).

Hope this helps. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 03:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback BrownHairedGirl. Dovea 15:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reginald Moss

Thanks for all your work on former MPs. However, I think I have to deprive you of one of the surviving MPs over the age of 90, Reginald Moss (UK politician). I'm guessing that you spotted on Rayment's page that Moss has a birth year (1913) but no death year given. I also looked him up in Stenton and Lees' "Who's Who of British MPs" and his entry there has an asterisk, indicating that Stenton and Lees thought him alive at the time of publication (c. 1980).

However, Reginald Moss is one of those who have left "Who's Who" without ever moving into "Who Was Who" with their date of death. I checked up on back issues of Who's Who this afternoon and found that his entry last appeared in Who's Who 1975. Normally, if an entry was removed because the subject had died, there would be a date of death in the next edition, but there is none in this case. That entry did not have a home address; a home address last appeared in his entry for 1963 (an address in Nuneaton). For a few years after that, the entry included the address of Labour Party headquarters in Coventry.

I can't find anything, other than Stenton and Lees, positively indicating that Reginald Moss was alive after 1975. He might have died before that, with no-one telling Who's Who of that fact. I did check some editions of Labour Party Annual Conference Reports, which in the 1970s has a list of deaths of Labour Party members, but could not find him there (although my set is not complete). He is not included in the Dictionary of Labour Biography. No obituary notice has ever appeared in The Times.

Rather than being WP:BOLD on this occasion I thought I would contact you first as I know you have an interest in this area. I think Reginald Moss should be moved into the Category "Year of death unknown". Sam Blacketer 18:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK Sam, that's fair enough - thank you. You may have noticed on Leigh Rayment's peerage pages that some MPs born before 1900 have no date of death(!) I didn't assume Reginald Moss is dead though as in theory he could have been alive at the age of 93. He hasn't been an MP for about 5 decades and perhaps for some reason he was omitted from Who's Who. I'll add a note on the discussion page. Thanks again. Dovea 12:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Entries used to be removed from Who's Who if the subject had been convicted of a serious criminal offence, although this is no longer the case. The subject can also ask for their entry to be removed, as Tony Benn famously did because they refused to censor the fact that he had been to private school. I wonder if Reginald Moss can be traced through alumni associations for his two universities, Birmingham and London? Sometimes universities print directories of living former students. Sam Blacketer 17:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On this subject, do you know if Spencer Le Marchant is still living Sam? I can't find his name in the most recent Who's Who. Thanks. Dovea 13:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately Sir Spencer Le Marchant died on 7 September 1986 (aged only 55). If I remember right his decision to stand down in 1983 was prompted by ill health. Sam Blacketer 17:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sam, I've updated his page. Dovea 18:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Parliamentary Barnstar
		I, Sam Blacketer, award you this barnstar for your exceptional contributions to biographical articles on former Members of Parliament, who would otherwise have remained unnoticed. Sam Blacketer 12:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sam - I don't know what to say! Dovea 20:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking

Please do NOT create dead Wikilinks...if someone wants to create an article, they can create the link at that time.→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 03:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't know what you're talking about or what a dead wikilink is. Dovea 18:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you click on a box like this, longevity claims, it should go somewhere. But if you click on a 'dead' link it doesn't go anywhere.

Also, your creation of articles that are little more than stubs is actually a disservice, because it makes it look like someone has 'done the work' when no work was done. It's better to NOT have a link because then everyone knows that no one has written an article yet. If you are going to start an article, please do something with it...i.e. Elias Wen, you didn't mention that he was an Orthodox priest, was born in China of Russian parents, linked to a reference, etc. Simply stating 'eighth-oldest man' is a waste of time (the ranking is already on the 'Oldest People' list, right?).R Young {^yakł_talk} 19:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only dead links I have created were made so I could create articles for them myself, and I believe I have done so with all of them on the Oldest people article. I didn't know about Elias Wen's background, and see no problem with creating stub articles which others can hopefully expand on. Dovea 10:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Francis (supercentenarian)

Hi Dovea. I'm very interested in your article on George Francis. Do you have any outside sources or links. I can't find any; and he's not listed on this website http://www.grg.org/Adams/E.HTM which is normally pretty reliable. Regards, Rrsmac 00:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid not. I simply saw his name on the Oldest people article and created a stub article from it. Dovea 10:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Cameron

Hello, you changed this article to state that he is a great something nephew of William IV- he is in fact a direct descendant. Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 22:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Aspinwall

Hi Dovea, I see that you created the article on Jack Aspinwall, in which you said that he was Liberal candidate for Wansbeck in 1974 ... but the Wansbeck constituency was not created until 1983. Can you check your sources? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BrownHairedGirl. In fact he stood in Kingswood in 1974, I've amended the article. Dovea 15:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs)

Frederick Roberts (politician)

Hi Dovea Please forgive me if I am wrong, but I have inferred from some of your edits that you may have a reasonable collection of Times Guides to the House of Commons, or other useful sources ... and I'm hoping that you may be able to help with a naming problem: Talk:Frederick Roberts (politician)#Name. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to help, BrownHairedGirl. Unfortunately my collection only dates back to the February 1974 edition. It would help if MPs didn't have the same name, I must admit, Lol. Sorry. Dovea 10:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Loveridge

On 19 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Loveridge, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 11:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of category from your userpage

Hi. In enacting consensus from User categories for discussion, I have removed the category Category:Wikipedians interested in books from your userpage. It was determined in that deletion debate that this category should be depopulated of individuals, but kept as a parent category. If you wish to display a category reflecting your interest in books, please consider one of the specific sub-categories under its umbrella. Thanks, and please excuse the necessary editing of your user page! ----Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Reimers

Hey I just recently did an article on Bruce Reimers and was wanting feeback on it. You have commented on some of the articles he is a category of. Please look at the article and give some feedback and feel free to add to it as well. Thanks!

--atacker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atacker (talk • contribs) 01:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan Morgan-Giles

I think Simon Heffer must have made a mistake with Morgan Morgan-Giles, who appears still to be alive. He certainly went to a memorial service for Sir Ian McGeoch on 29 October last year. He will be 94 on June 14. Sam Blacketer (talk) 20:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dovea! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Gwilym Jones - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alan Wynne Williams - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wyn Roberts, Baron Roberts of Conwy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ian Twinn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dudley Smith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Allen McKay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michael Welsh (Labour politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ednyfed Hudson Davies - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down on the UK Election Stubs

Whoa there... let's slow down on these UK Election stubs. Of the 9 you've created recently, they appear to be template copy-pastes that don't add a lot more than just the numbers that come off of the link you provide. Why don't you slow down and choose one to improve. Choose some of the other election articles to see a good formatting setup and possibilities for additional information. Shadowjams (talk) 03:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I want to create some stubs on all the annual local election results from 1973 to the present. Unfortunately at present I have little to add to the information other that what is provided in the source, there being little other information available elsewhere on the subject. I hope to create pages for 1979-1989 today, and then improve the articles in the days to come.

Proposed deletion of Christopher Murphy

The article Christopher Murphy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am nomination this article for deletion because it fails WP:BASIC by not having multiple sources: with one being a self published source and the other not being readily verifiable. It also fails WP:GNG as it does not assert the significance of this person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grammarxxx (talk) 23:46, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maureen Hicks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Speaker of the British House of Commons election, 1971 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Horace King

Speaker of the British House of Commons election, 1992 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tom Arnold

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Speaker of the British House of Commons election, 1951 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hugh O'Neill and David Logan

Speaker of the British House of Commons election, 2000 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tony Wright

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Speaker of the British House of Commons election, 1895, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samuel Whitbread (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arbella Ewing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arbella Ewing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbella Ewing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Local election articles

Hello Dovea. Thanks for creating the UK local election article recently. However, they haven't been formatted correctly, so I thought I would give you a few tips:

Generally articles start with the keywords being bolded. In this case, it would usually be Local elections
The See also and References sections need to have proper headings. You can make these using two equal signs either side of the text, e.g. ==References==
The See also section should be listed before the References section.
Ideally your references should be "inline", i.e. directly citing the sentences that are being referenced. You can do this using the <ref> </ref> tags, and then adding {{reflist}} in the References section.

I've added the section headings and bolding to your articles, but you may wish to sort out the references. If you want a simple example, have a look at this article I created earlier. If you have any questions or need any help, please let me know. Cheers, Number 5 7 21:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dovea. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dovea. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dovea. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dovea. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

George Francis (supercentenarian) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George Francis (supercentenarian). Since you had some involvement with the George Francis (supercentenarian) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — JFG ^talk 11:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Goodson-Wickes

The article Charles Goodson-Wickes has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Ruckley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jay Ruckley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jay Ruckley

Hello, Dovea. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jay Ruckley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jay Ruckley

Hello, Dovea. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jay Ruckley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

On all those MP articles

Roy Hughes

Cross References

Layout of articles

More on MP articles

Still more on MP stubs..

double article

Linking articles

Liberal Democrat

William Hamling

MPs by Parliament

Willie Hamilton

Category:Supporters of the British Conservative Party

Category: Living Centenarians

Derek Page

link to British

New stub articles on MPs

Reginald Moss

Barnstar

Wikilinking

George Francis (supercentenarian)

David Cameron

Jack Aspinwall

Frederick Roberts (politician)

John Loveridge

Removal of category from your userpage

Bruce Reimers

Morgan Morgan-Giles

Unreferenced BLPs

Slow down on the UK Election Stubs

Proposed deletion of Christopher Murphy

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

ArbCom elections are now open!

Nomination of Arbella Ewing for deletion

Local election articles

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

George Francis (supercentenarian) listed at Redirects for discussion

Proposed deletion of Charles Goodson-Wickes

Jay Ruckley moved to draftspace

Concern regarding Draft:Jay Ruckley

Your draft article, Draft:Jay Ruckley