User talk:Doubletrouble10

This is Doubletrouble10's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg MacLennan (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jdcomix was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greg MacLennan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jdcomix (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doubletrouble10! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jdcomix (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg MacLennan (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greg MacLennan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Youknow? (talk) 17:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg MacLennan (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Apple podcast isn't a reliable source; I can see them through the reference layout.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greg MacLennan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg MacLennan (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greg MacLennan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OnlyNano^talk 15:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Margaux movie poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Margaux movie poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Doubletrouble10! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 18:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg MacLennan (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We're looking for more sources that talk about the subject in depth, like this one [1]. Is there anything else like that about him or his editing work specifically? IMDB is also not a reliable source (sorry).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greg MacLennan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering hi! I have an article that talks about his trailer editing work: https://filmschoolrejects.com/how-to-cut-a-trailer-for-a-movie-where-no-one-speaks-38e340aac55a/ and this one: https://tribeza.com/arts/ones-to-watch-greg-maclennan-electric-owl-creative/. is the issue that I have too many citations for other things in here? he def has enough articles about him in particular and is a noteworthy subject. thank you! Doubletrouble10 (talk) 02:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That first one doesn't help for notability purposes, since it's an interview, but I just missed the second. So that's ready for a pass, I think - but can you remove the information that is sources to IMDB, or find a reliable source for it instead? Ping me when you're done that and I'll accept the draft. -- asilvering (talk) 05:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering removed IMDb citation. thanks! would this be more acceptable now? Doubletrouble10 (talk) 07:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm personally not fussed by things like "he edited movie Foo" not having a citation if they're not something that sounds wacky, but you should have citations for things like MacLennan won the "Best Editing" Award for Seek at the 2021 Chicago Horror Film Festival. -- asilvering (talk) 19:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering I left that citation but linked it to the film festivals direct page instead of his. will that work or does it need a different source? thanks for your help! Doubletrouble10 (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The best possible source would be the film festival's own website. IMDB isn't a reliable source because it's user-generated. -- asilvering (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering unfortunately they don't have information for 2021 on their website still! IMDb has to be vetted/approved from my understanding. I can remove that sentence if that's what is keeping this from being accepted. again, thanks for all of the help and advice. I appreciate it! Doubletrouble10 (talk) 23:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, it's not ideal, but it's not something that's critical for acceptance either. I've accepted the article. Thanks for writing it! -- asilvering (talk) 23:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering ha thanks! Doubletrouble10 (talk) 23:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg MacLennan has been accepted

Greg MacLennan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 23:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]