User talk:Doublebkkfc

Doublebkkfc, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Doublebkkfc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Ordinal number

Hi, Doublebkkfc.

I am here to oppose about all my edits, added ordinal number, that you revert.

Because all of President of the United States wikipedia page have an ordinal number before their title such as Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden. In addition all Thai wikipedia pages about Prime minister of Thailand and Governor of Bangkok have an ordinal number too.

As you can see.

So I am going to revert all your edits, removed ordinal number, back to mine

Regards

MayThe2nd (talk) 17:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Doublebkkfc:.

Is this 2001:FB1:5C:A161:4CB1:9A9A:CF93:680D you?

I really appreciate any help you can provide.

MayThe2nd (talk) 16:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MayThe2nd, I'm not 2001:FB1:5C:A161:4CB1:9A9A:CF93:680D but I agree with him and also stop the edit war. As you mention, I think you can wdit and add an ordinary number on List of prime ministers of Thailand not to add in infobox. Because if you add an ordinary number in infobox you must add any number on any position. As you can see Prime Minister of Japan Fumio Kishida, Prime Minister of the Netherlands Mark Rutte they are all not have an ordinal order in their infobox. POTUS position can't reference on this wiki page caz this is Prime Minister not The President. If you have any question can ask me, Thank you. Doublebkkfc (talk) 03:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Doublebkkfc:.

Thanks for your reply.

I want to oppose your idea and I want to share my 4 reasons about adding an ordinal number in infobox:

1. Like I have said before, all Thai wikipedia alticles about Prime minister of Thailand and Governor of Bangkok have an ordinal number. I know that English wikipedia is not Thai wikipedia but I think it’s better to have an ordinal number in an infobox

2. There aren’t any ordinal numbers to indicate on List of prime ministers of Thailand so adding an ordinal number in an infobox in English wikipedia article of Prime minister of Thailand and Governor of Bangkok would be better.

3.Sometime when people surfing the internet and going to read an article on English wikipedia people just read only an infobox of the article so if an infobox just have an ordinal number to indicate order of Prime minister of Thailand and Governor of Bangkok it would better than an infobox that does not have an ordinal number

4.If you said that POTUS position can't reference on this. It’s okay. So let’s talk about Prime Minister. You was giving 2 examples that were Fumio Kishida, Prime Minister of Japan, and Mark Rutte, Prime Minister of the Netherlands. Alright, I see your point but you can not say that any other English wikipedia article of Prime Minister does not have an ordinal number in an infobox because there are a lot of English wikipedia articles of Prime Minister that have an infobox. I will giving 30 examples below.

Here is the list of example of Prime Minister’s English Wikipedia Article that have an ordinal number before title in an infobox

List of example (in alphabetical order)
number in this list	Sovereign state	Prime Minister
1	Albania	Edi Rama
2	Andorra	Xavier Espot Zamora
3	Angola	Paulo Kassoma
4	Anguilla	Ellis Webster
5	Antigua and Barbuda	Gaston Browne
6	Armania	Nikol Pashinyan
7	Artsakh	Arayik Harutyunyan
8	Aruba	Evelyn Wever-Croes
9	Australia	Anthony Albanese
10	Azerbaijan	Ali Asadov
11	Bahamas	Philip Davis
12	Barbados	Mia Mottley
13	Belarus	Roman Golovchenko
14	Belize	Johnny Briceño
15	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Zoran Tegeltija
16	Bermuda	Edward David Burt
17	Cameroon	Joseph Ngute
18	Canada	Justin Trudeau
19	China, People's Republic of	Li Keqiang
20	Cook Islands	Mark Brown
21	Curaçao	Gilmar Pisas
22	Denmark	Mette Frederiksen
23	Dominica	Roosevelt Skerrit
24	Estonia	Kaja Kallas
25	Finland	Sanna Marin
26	Gabon	Rose Christiane Raponda
27	Korea, Republic of	Han Duck-soo
28	Singapore	Lee Hsien Loong
29	Ukraine	Denys Shmyhal
30	Vietnam	Phạm Minh Chính

And a lot more. Above are just 30 examples.

In addition, the idea of adding an ordinal number in an infobox is not only just my idea but also other users have agreed to this idea too.

Such as Special:Diff/1090782691, Special:Diff/1090783017, and Special:Diff/1090783046 that was not done by me but done by other fellow wikipedian.

Moreover, there is an ordinal number in English wikipedia article of Phraya Phahonphonphayuhasena before my edit, you can see it here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phraya_Phahonphonphayuhasena&oldid=1089938230

In conclusion, at least 2 other fellow wikipedians have agreed on the same idea (adding an ordinal number) with me.

I am open to hear your opinion. For your consideration.

Regards

MayThe2nd (talk) 11:11, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this somewhere else than on a specific user's talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thailand § Presidents of Thailand: Number in infoboxes?

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thailand § Presidents of Thailand: Number in infoboxes?. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doublebkkfc, you had made multiple reverts ([1], [2], etc.), so I assumed the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Thailand#Prime_Minister_of_Thailand_and_Governor_of_Bangkok:_Ordinal_number_in_infoboxes? would be interesting to you. Sadly, you have not joined the discussion yet, while continuing to edit in other areas of the encyclopedia.

If you have lost interest in the topic, that's fine, but you're expected not to revert again until you have joined the discussion and found a consensus there. You may else be blocked to prevent further edit warring. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not seem fair

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Doublebkkfc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think the reason for blocking me isn't fair. Are you listening to the user that incriminates me for one user? you are not fair. the allegation for Sockpuppet is unreasonable You only want to protect the users you like. I will report this to the Wikipedia Foundation for your unfair conduct. Doublebkkfc (talk) 00:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Summarily declined due to the personal attacks, threats of off wiki harassment, and legal threats below. Legal threats are not permitted. Further such attacks and you will lose access to this page. 331dot (talk) 01:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2022

I have removed a comment from here that appears to have been threatening physical harm. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]