User talk:Dou Kya? Dou Kya?

Right (neutral) and wrong ways to describe reputation

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kajol seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. For appropriate ways to describe a person's reputation, see WP:SUBSTANTIATE. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dou Kya? Dou Kya?, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dou Kya? Dou Kya?! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Arjun Kapoor, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] We are not interested in editors' personal opinions and evaluations. In the edit above, you introduce at least three pieces of POV content without providing a reference that expressly states these opinions. "acclaimed action romance", "He followed this success with roles that earned him negative reviews and failed commercially.", and then unilaterally deciding that Fanny was "an average grosser at the box-office." It's also unclear why you deleted the Personal life section and why the reference from that section was merged into the previous content, not supporting the statement being made. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Patiparmeshwar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]