User talk:Patiparmeshwar

December 2019

Hello, I'm Felida97. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sridevi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Felida97 (talk) 20:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohammad Jibran Nasir, you may be blocked from editing. Kthxbay (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Deepika Padukone, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Saba Qamar, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove templates please

Please don't remove templates as you did from the infobox in this content resubmission. If you don't know what purpose a template serves, leave it alone. Further, please don't use hyperbolic language like "blockbuster" and "immensely successful". See WP:PUFFERY. This is a neutral encyclopedia and we write in a dispassionate tone. We're not here to drool over celebrities and their accomplishments. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Momina Mustehsan, you may be blocked from editing. Kthxbay (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Momina Mustehsan. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Kthxbay (talk) 23:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mahira Khan; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Diffs:[1][2][3], etc. Your changes have been reverted multiple times by various editors. It is not acceptable that you keep resubmitting the same content. When you are reverted the first time, you need to open a discussion on the article's talk page and seek consensus for the changes you want to see implemented. If you fail to do this, you will be blocked the next time you make these changes. It is further problematic that you keep restoring improperly formatted content to the article. Stop. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PUFFERY

I also strongly warn you to stop submitting puffery or other forms of exaggerated statements, since that appears to be what the other editor has objected to at the Mahira Khan article, and I also see you doing the same thing here. If you are here to promote article subjects, that will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. Additionally, if you are a paid editor, you must disclose that per WP:PAID. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also this. You removed a {{short description}} template for no good reason, and you added more unsourced content and puffery. You are very close to having your editing privileges revoked, so I recommend you start talking. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Your resistance to discussing your edits is problematic, as is your attempts to evade scrutiny by editing while logged out,[4][5][6] as this violates our policy on sockpuppetry. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Search Results Web results Aap ki Kachehri, Kiran Bedi ke Saath. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 00:41, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Patiparmeshwar, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 17:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Patiparmeshwar, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 12:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]