User talk:Dormantos

This is not a page to test your stuff out here. Only do needful. And please no Vandalism

Archives

Note Earlier Stuff has been moved to Archive Manually. Dormantos (talk) 16:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Dormantos! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:38, Friday, April 3, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Uff! Before I complete Adventure, I get some urgent work! LOL Dormantos (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Completed Finally Completed All Missions of Adventure Dormantos (talk) 13:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vadodara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Fixing.. Dormantos (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vadodara Bus Station

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vadodara Bus Station, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Biblioworm 16:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you too. I had created the article. Is there any way I can delete it directly? @worm Dormantos (talk) 16:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dormantos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Bbb23, Just got to know that I have been blocked from editing Wikipedia. I wanted to know why have I been blocked for and at what grounds? I did not make any sort of vandalism or disruptive editing. Why am I been punished for no offense? I have created two articles in past 3 days and did not get any notice or warnings on talk page. You said in SPI that I have been blocked for using same style of writing as any other user Sanjoy64 who was blocked for disruptive editing. You can find the same style of writing in Chetan Bhagat books as well. And neither my edit match to that of that guy and neither does it qualifies SPI as per https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Guidance So why do you punish me? User:Dormantos Dormantos (talk) 16:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply I wanted to know the reason fpr the block. It's not valid reason to call me a sock to some other useless user with whom I have no connections at all. In my request, I wanted to know the reasons and not the status. I am blocked from editing Wikipedia in a healthy manner. Doesn't my contributions prove that? Then why am I being called a sock puppet of any other user who worked for disrupting this project? Moreover I can see you listed an created article 'Maraju Sumanth' for speedy deletion because I created it stating CSD applies. But I have not created the article evading this block nor creating any other account for that. The policy states the article is applicable for Speedy Deletion if it's edited during a block. Moreover blocking me for a foolish reason is unfair. Sorry for being too sharp. Ping @ User:Bbb23, User:DoRD, User:Dai Pritchard -- Dormantos (talk) 09:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]