User talk:Dontfeedmyfrog

Notability of Anton cheung

A tag has been placed on Anton cheung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{Hangon}} it is just a brief history of this great man

The Hangon needs to be placed on the article page and the discussion take place on the article's talk page. As the article has been deleted it's a moot point anyway for now. Perhaps you should look to read a few more articles and undertake to constructively edit a few articles before you create your first article. You might want to read the Tutorial first -- Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Zoe Richardson

A tag has been placed on Zoe Richardson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Cssiitcic (talk) 19:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Lemon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. – iridescent 19:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Badminton constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. – iridescent 19:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Lemon. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf^(talk) 20:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crosshill road

The article Crosshill road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]