User talk:Dontaskme

This user may have left Wikipedia. Dontaskme has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Dontaskme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! D. J. Bracey (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neuro-ophthalmology

Per Talk:Neuro-ophthalmologist, I created the Neuro-ophthalmology article; however, it still needs work. Cheers! AED 05:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'm quite busy with other things right now (I'm about to move) and won't be able to do any major work on this. But I might do some minor edits once in a while. Dontaskme 02:52, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision

It was deleted after it was prod'ded (proposed for deletion). Usually, some editor adds the prod tag to an article, and it can be removed by any editor at any time (for valid reasons). However, if the article is not fixed up in the 5-day prod period, it will be deleted. That's what happened to this article. If you feel that the article should not have been deleted, we can go to AfD and obtain community consensus on the article's status. Nishkid 64 21:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking back on it now, I have some doubts to the initial prod. It does appear that the article is notable, so I will restore the page. Although I would like to go to AfD for this, I think the article follows notability guidelines. Nishkid 64 17:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sent to AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Nishkid 64 18:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Glad to see you're back. FYI, Wikipedia:WikiProject Ophthalmology is up and running in the event you have any interest. -AED 21:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LandoltC.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LandoltC.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of IGOR Pro

The article IGOR Pro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable software with no independent refs tagged for notability > 2 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]