User talk:Doniago/Archive 88
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Doniago. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | Archive 89 | Archive 90 | → | Archive 95 |
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox album on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Spit (card game)
Thanks for the welcome, but I've actually been on Wikipedia for more than ten years. I've reinstated the edit to Spit (card game), and included a source that supports it, as requested. Gregorytopov (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- It appears another editor took issue with the source you provided. I see that you moved your comparison to Golf to the mechanics section, but without a source it's still original research, and I'm not sure how it's relevant at this point. Why Golf in particular, and why is it relevant that this mechanic is similar to Golf (i.e. how is this not trivia)? As you note, you've been here ten years, so I'm a little surprised by your apparent unfamiliarity with regards to the policies on original research. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 13:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
3O
I see that you removed my request on WP:3O because it didn't belong there. What should I do next? Thank you for your help. Firestar464 (talk) 03:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- You're welcome to pursue other forms of dispute resolution. 3O is explicitly only for disputes where there are only two involved editors. Hence the term "third opinion". If you'd like to link me to the situation I'd be happy to take a look to see whether I can offer more specific advice. Good luck! DonIago (talk) 04:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank You, Doniago — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milomit (talk • contribs) 05:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:To Pimp a Butterfly on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Coma
Not sure why you reverted my Coma edits. Was it because they pushed the plot summary over 700 words? If so, that can easily be remedied by compensatory cuts. The added details are critical to the plot. And what was wrong with the addition re the musical score? Such things are commonly treated in the Production section.Rozsaphile1 (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yes to the first question; plot summaries for films typically shouldn't exceed 700 words. You're welcome to refactor the summary to include some or all of your changes while removing other unneeded details.
- Regarding the score, you claimed that it's notable; you shouldn't be making that claim without providing a reliable source that substantiates it and discusses the absence of the score for the first half of the film.
- Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Salem’s lot
Sure, no problem. I said in my edit that if my second attempt is judged as novel plotting, I wouldn’t try again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sodari (talk • contribs) 00:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Inception Edit
Yes, I'm sorry, did I forget to leave a reason of explanation? My apologies for that, reason was that I just so happened to be reading and noticed that a recent name change had not been taken into account in the credits. A note was left, only to redirect to the newly renamed page. I made it more simple and changed from Ellen Page to Elliot Page, would have been done eventually, apologies for the lack of explanation.Bigtime_Boy5969 TT me 17:19, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm still not following you. If I looked at it correctly, before your edit the article said "Elliot" with a footnote link mentioning that Elliot was previously known as Ellen. Your edit removed that footnote link. Based on other articles I've seen in which Elliot is brought up, there seems to be a consensus that including that footnote link is appropriate. If Elliot's name doesn't currently apparently with a link to the footnoted explanation, please restore it. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 17:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
List of films featuing giant monsters edit
You've removed three new entries I made in this because one of the three did not cite its source. The other two entries should remain. Please revert the changes to the two entries I made which contain citations. Thank you. Sterlingjones (talk) 05:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)