User talk:Doncastor

Doncastor, you are invited to try Wikipedia training modules

If you're looking for some guidance on how to get started, try these training modules.

basic rules how to edit evaluating articles

adding images citing sources copyright rules

about these trainings

We're trying to improve our tools for helping new editors get started. These trainings are hosted on the "Programs & Events Dashboard", a tool for helping Wikipedia editors organize editing events. You can optionally log in using your Wikipedia account to keep track of which trainings you've completed.

If you have feedback, we'd love to hear it!

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doncastor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Doncastor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catherine Losing (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Currently all references point to either interviews, non-notable blogs, niche magazines or articles crediting the subject with the photo. Not the type of in-depth coverage that Wikipedia notability guidelines require.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Catherine Losing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Catherine Losing has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Catherine Losing. Thanks! Waggie (talk) 18:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catherine Losing (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yanjipy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources show no notability of of the subject, and I do question the Google Drive source as I've never seen it before on Wikipedia as a source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Catherine Losing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Catherine Losing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yanjipy (talk) 02:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Catherine Losing

Hello, Doncastor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Catherine Losing.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]