User talk:Don't Hate Me People

October 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Cossack cuisine, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. R0paire 03:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rick Hansen Secondary School (Mississauga). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. R0paire 03:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Jumoke Oduwole, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. R0paire 03:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@R0paire-wiki

Why, did I just add a comma? Am I banned from editing on Wikipedia now? Don't Hate Me People (talk) 03:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not blocked (though I would heed this advice to avoid potential blocks), but you need to follow Manual of Style standards when editing on Wikipedia. R0paire 03:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@R0paire-wiki

Spare me! I think you're the one who needs to follow the Manual of Style when trying to stop someone from editing Wikipedia. Don't Hate Me People (talk) 23:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair Ban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Don't Hate Me People (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You banned me even though I did nothing wrong and that is unfair, and on top of that I was almost banned just for editing a comma in an article. I think this is an abuse of authority! I firmly believe that these actions were an abuse of authority by the administrator and were not in accordance with Wikipedia policy. As detailed in WP:ADMINGUIDE/B, WP:BLOCKNOTPUNITIVE, WP:BLOCKP and WP:CDB, blocking should be done “to protect the encyclopedia from harm”, not to punish or “cool down” an editor. I did not vandalize, display gross incivility, harass, spam, edit war, intercede, attack or threaten, but only edited articles. I ask that you unblock my account! Don't Hate Me People (talk) 00:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account was blocked for sockpuppetry, and this request does not address that. Girth Summit _(blether) 01:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't Hate Me People (talk) 00:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked to avoid wasting additional bytes on this nonsense.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]