User talk:Dominiqueque

Hi Dominiqueque! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

05:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Football League in Toronto has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Football League in Toronto was changed by Dominiqueque (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943755 on 2019-06-15T01:14:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Debate on the monarchy in Canada, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Brexit. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Adam9007 (talk) 04:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Brexit; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adam9007 (talk) 05:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Brexit. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 17:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Brexit; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dorsetonian (talk) 23:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Brexit. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop assuming the outcome of the vote, and stop your unsourced speculation. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm 1990'sguy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Greg Abbott have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 1990'sguy (talk) 02:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Greg Abbott. Kuru (talk) 12:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]