User talk:Domer48/Archive 6

1RR

Although I don't normally run to teacher as you do, I have decided to report your breach of 1RR here and here within the next 12-24 hours. Before I do, you may wish to consider withdrawing your recent complaint against me. Such a course of action may persuade me to change my mind. Mooretwin (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts of IP's are not counted by the 1RR sanctions, but nice attempt at blackmail. Mo ainm~Talk 22:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions have been raised here. Mooretwin (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Free the POW's Mural Belfast.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Free the POW's Mural Belfast.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks Domer for you support regarding the Carlingford Lough block. Bjmullan (talk) 11:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any time.--Domer48_'fenian' 23:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

carlingford lough

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Carlingford Lough - Location field". Thank you.

Your contribution welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gravyring (talk • contribs) 22:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for spotting my mess up there Domer! I read it ar...ways. Thanks for the revert.Murry1975 (talk) 23:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Domer48_'fenian' 23:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free the POW's Mural Belfast.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Free the POW's Mural Belfast.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

Giant's Causeway

Spills over to Carlingford Lough

Spills over to Republic of Ireland–United Kingdom border

--Domer48_'fenian' 17:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Reports

Sock Reports

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Domer48. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 22:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tom Barry IRA.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tom Barry IRA.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IRA Volunteers 1979.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IRA Volunteers 1979.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. damiens.rf 15:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AE

Regarding this, it seems reasonable enough to allow someone to remove a report they have filed after being informed there was no 1RR breach. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 14:47, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self reverted, but its caught in an edit conflict I think? --Domer48_'fenian' 14:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Just revert to that version, assuming nobody comments on any of the other case in the meantime.~~ 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 14:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, he's removed it again. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 15:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DRN

Hi, I'm Ebe123, an DRN volunteer. I'm here to inform you that there is a thread at WP:DRN of which you were listed as a party. The thread is Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Corporals_killings. Your comment is appriciated. ~~Ebe 123~~ → report 19:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IRA: was/is

Have I become involved unwittingly involved in a shit-storm? Is there anything happening with the DRN with regards to the tense of the article? GiollaUidir (talk) 15:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

Per the consensus of uninvolved administrators in this AE thread, you are banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to The Troubles, the Ulster banner and British baronets, broadly construed across all namespaces for a period of 3 months. This topic ban may be appealed at AE, and every six months thereafter. Per WP:AC/DS#Appeal you may appeal this ban the appropriate noticeboard (currently Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement), or directly to the Arbitration Committee--Cailil ^talk 13:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]