User talk:Dolores Davies

Welcome!

Hello, Dolores Davies, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! NiciVampireHeart 16:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Acroterion (talk) 00:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dolores Davies (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Dolores Davies (talk) 11:04, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the violations of WP:SOCK. Additionally, you seem to state other people have been using your account. If so, you are not ever eligible for unblock consideration, as per WP:COMPROMISED. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello I am unaware why on may 6 May 2018 I have received a block due to sockpuppetry. I am not aware that I have been violating any rules, I know other people close to me have been using my account, or perhaps someone was using my ip please can I be unblocked as I have not been to my knowledge violating any rules . Dolores Davies (talk) 10:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admin: Amy foster (talk · contribs) sock, serial abuser of pages related to a hoax/egregious BLP violation concerning Erika Heynatz. Acroterion (talk) 11:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dolores Davies (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi I did not make a clear or constructive reason why I wanted to be considered for an unblock in my first request. I am not going to deny as I cannot that I have been using multiple accounts to alter information around on Erika Heynatz and other articles related to her, about her death. I can truly say when I added this information about her death I was not aware it was false information, you see that is why I kept adding it back and I could not understand why her page kept getting protected and I kept getting warnings and then a block when adding this information. You see I saw information on a YouTube video see link here for proof https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O6DfMZ1jqU it is entitled tribute and it claimed she passed away in January 2018 aged 42, then I saw something on a website here is again the link for proof,https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/186865633/erika-heynatz it was called find a grave and it had information about her death and alleged other famous people from Australia like David Hobson writing a tribute, I mean I should have looked for newspapers and news reports from Australia to see if this was true before I kept changing this on her page, but I took what I had read to be accurate, it was only after I was blocked that when I did some research on her I found it was false,even though I did persistently keep adding this information. I was not aware at the time I was doing it know was false as I was going by the information I found if I had known I would not have kept adding it, it was never my intention to vandalise or disrupt Wikipedia and intentionally publish false rumours about a living person. Please can I be unblocked and I will sincerely promise I will never ever again add any information to any living persons article unless I have used accurate and reliable sources.Dolores Davies (talk) 23:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were not aware it was false information? You were asking about those false reports before re-adding them. That makes it difficult to take the rest of your request at face value. Huon (talk) 00:15, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.