User talk:Dollsteak14

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dollsteak14! Thank you for your contributions. We are Barkeep49 and ToBeFree, and we have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave us a message on our talk pages. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ToBeFree (talk) 01:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dollsteak14! You created a thread called Serban Ghenea's deleted article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Allmusic as reliable source

It's true that for many things, Allmusic is a reliable source. It's also true that when a non-notable engineer or mixer wants to add a credit to any album they want, they can do so. Check this page for more info on how to do that. As a result, these minor credits like mixer, recording engineer, etc. on the Josh Wilbur page aren't from a reliable secondary source. He, or his rep, could've easily added those credits himself. Just for one quick example, I happen to own one of the CD's in that list that you're attempting to add and his name doesn't appear anywhere on it. Amsgearing (talk) 20:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked you to discuss this on this talk page. Instead, you reverted on the article again, adding unreliable info. I'll ask you again to discuss here. Please. Amsgearing (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Wilbur

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chubbles (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]