User talk:Dojarca/Archive4

Speedy deletion of Inverse curve

A tag has been placed on Inverse curve requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!)} 12:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

No, I am not an idiot, when I saw the article it had almost nothing, if you say stuff like that again, it will be classed as a personal attack, and could get you blocked, also don't remove the speedy deletion tags yourself! The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!)} 12:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

You pu the tag 10 seconds after I created the article.--Dojarca (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh sorry for that then! The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!)} 12:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!)} 12:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

List of Roman legions

I don't think your source is authoritative. I don't believe a XXV legion ever existed. In any case the account of the Battle of Soissons (in Gregory of Tours Historia Francorum) does not specify the units involved, so this is pure speculation. Regards EraNavigator (talk) 09:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

My point is that there is no evidence , literary or archaeological, for a XXV legion. And all statements must be based on evidence. I suggest that you use authoritative sources for your research (i.e. books by university academics or reputable encyclopedias e.g. Encyclopedia Britannica) and NOT other websites, which are often full of inaccuracies and even inventions. Best wishes EraNavigator (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

File:David,larry.JPG		My RFA
		Thank you muchly for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth! Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Krasnikov

• I believe you made an error in moving the article Serguei Krasnikov (physicist) – from "Serguei Krasnikov" to "Sergei Krasnikov". I've moved it back per correction. While we were working together at Starlab, and in all personal communications following, Serguei has used the former spelling convention in all correspondence and grant proposals. I've attached to the article, for your review, links and references to the NASA Advanced Propulsion grant announcement, to Krasnikov's Starlab Discovery Channel interview, to his Friedmann lab homepage and curriculum vitae. Please feel free to contact me via my user page if you have any questions on the matter. There's a contact link under my first reference [1] – Kind regards, Altman

Romanisation

Hi Dojarca,

Thank you for your support. I don't know yet how to submit a request but when I do, I will ask for your support. Regards, Anatoli Titarev. --Atitarev (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Beato degli Atenori

A tag has been placed on Beato degli Atenori requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 12:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Chemical industry museums

Sorry but your last edit to Catalyst (museum) does not make sense and the reference provided is in Russian (I think). Is it possible to get a translation and maybe some clarification? I don't really mind if Catalyst were not the first museum of the chemical industry, but I should like some evidence I can understand in order to correct the article, if that becomes necessary. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 20:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)