User talk:Doctor Duh/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hi Doctor Duh! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome. I had already found the community portal, but the Help:Introduction page is new to me, I'll be sure to go through it. Also, just to verify and since I noticed it in the Help Desk thread just now - @Gråbergs Gråa Sång: - did you get a notification from this, like I did just now? Doctor Duh (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did! 2 things you may want to try, if you don't "have" them already:

Enable "Discussion tools" at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures. It gives every comment on a discussion page a "reply" link, and has a button for easier notification.
Enable "Newcomer homepage" bottom of Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal. It's a new thingie that's meant to be helpful. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely, thanks again! The "Discussion tools"... tool I already found, as a matter of fact I'm using it right now, and I'll have a look at your other suggestion as well. Doctor Duh (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing by non registered users

Besides other issues, I often wonder if editing by non-registered users allows for more sock pupetting in some cases.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnpacklambert, the end of IP editing would certainly make WP:EWLO moot. Having to specifically create an account for disruptive edits rather than just logging out would probably create enough of a psychological barrier to prevent some impulse-driven disruption, but I don't have the slightest clue as to how significant that might possibly be. In the grander scheme of things, bad actors with technical skill and a budget would still be capable of reliably eluding the checkuser tool, while the more bumbling types would continue to dive butt-first into the spike pit. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 21:27, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Athanasios Raptis AfD

I suggest you retract the aggressive statement at the AfD. I'm also extremely frustrated with Das omsnezz's disruptive techniques, and would like to see sanctions, but I'd like to continue the recent lessened acrimony at AfD. Cheers, Ovinus (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 20:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Hopefully the ArbCom-sanctioned discussion will sort things out longer term. Ovinus (talk) 20:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

I got the notification that you sent me an email, but no email actually arrived (not even in my junk folder). Not sure what went wrong, but figured I'd let you know so you know why I'm not responding, and so that you might try to resend if you'd like. AddWittyNameHere 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, that's odd. Was just a small observation, and I unfortunately unchecked the "Send copy" box, so I might or might not just re-formulate it in a bit :) Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 10:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Received & replied. :) AddWittyNameHere 22:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on WP:ANI. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]