User talk:Doco/Archive3

Aldi Article Vandalism

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing with the Aldi article. If you continue vandalising, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. 217.232.185.89

The moving of the article Gunter Eheim

Good day. I see you've recently moved the article Günter Eheim to Gunter Eheim. While I can see that you're a native speaker of german, I won't contest your greater knowledge than mine over the language itself, but if you consult the talk page of the article, there was a consensus reached over the correct spelling of the name of the article. Unless you can prove the consensus wrong (which I don't doubt you can considering your a native german), could you please revert the moving of the article you did back to it's original location, that is, Günter Eheim ? If you can prove the consensus wrong, please add the sources to the talk page so that everyone can be made aware of the currently standing spelling. Danke Sehr ! Dread Specter 03:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concerned about spam? Look at yourself.

Please refrain from deleting perfectly good external links, labeling them as spam in article histories, and then branding the contributors as spammers by pasting boilerplate undeletable spam messages on their Talk pages. This amounts to reverse spam. If you read Wikipedia's guidelines on external links carefully, you'll discover that there are exceptions to the rules. If you aspire to be a good editor, it would behoove you to learn how to discriminate such exceptions, rather than to dismiss valuable contributions with robotic messages that cynically welcome contributors while accusing them of spamming.

You might also examine what motivates you to police articles to which you have contributed, and why you relish applying accusatory labels. Understanding, for example, that such behavior often stems from feelings of powerlessness could be helpful with reining in a need to control others. 69.182.5.12 17:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lidl Image change

I noticed yo recently made a change to the Lidl article changing a picture, i appreciate your edits to the article, though are you sure that the new picture is of greater quality than the one it replaced?

Edit id: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lidl&diff=96845281&oldid=94484826

Images:

The image is good, but the old image had slightly more of the store front in frame, is not intruded on by a large close-to-camera car, nor a lampost. It seems to me that the original picture should be reinstated, or that both images are used in the article. What is your opinion on the matter, and should we hold a public consensus on this? I'd greatly appreciate if you could reply, either to here or my talk page. Thanks in advance Benbread 11:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Just fiddled with the template and NA now works. Agathoclea 23:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hanover and Nuremberg

Please answer either of the questions I asked; further discussion depends on your answer to those questions. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Start-class ratings

Could you please help me and tell me (perhaps at the comments subpage) what is wrong with my articles Philipp Jenninger and Andreas Joseph Hofmann? You rated them as "weak in many areas". Thank you, Kusma (討論) 10:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kryill and stuff

Hey sorry about my tone on WikiProject talk, I guess I got a bit carried away emotionally (the storm did have some close effects to me). I am an experienced editor in WikiProject Tropical cyclones so I know a lot about how naming of tropical cyclones work and the difference in how the European names operate. To give you a reasonable explanation here goes:

Names assigned to tropical cyclones are from a predetermined list, agreed upon by the relevant WMO members. The designated RSMC for the region (NOAA for Atlantic hurricanes) names the storms and this name is used by all countries for official forecasts and documents (eg Mexico on Hurricane Gordon [1]). The press invariably refers to the storms by these names, irrespective of where the organisation or the storm is.
The European storm names are selected by FU Berlin without consultation with any other organisation. These names are used for every high/low pressure area in the European area for German forecasts, and some other nations too, but other nations do not use them. As a result, German media extensively uses these names, but the press elsewhere don't as a rule (the exceptions come from seeing how the Germans are reporting it). Furthermore, other weather services can and do select names for themselves such as happened with the Norwegians and Per.

Hopefully that makes clearer the significant differences between how the two schemes work for you. Whilst I personally dislike (seems in poor taste to me) the highest-bidder thing I agree it doesn't really matter as to how the name is generated, its more how these names are approved (the weather services of many nations vs one German academic institution).--Nilf anion (talk) 01:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland links in Kyrill (storm)

Just wondering, why did you revert my corrections of the links to Ireland in the above article [2]? They were completely valid as all the other links are to states, while Ireland on its own links to the geographical term which includes Northern Ireland, even though that's already included in United Kingdom. - ^Рэд_хот^{(t • c • e)} 13:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I thought that might've been it (just didn't want to make assumptions). - ^Рэд_хот^{(t • c • e)} 17:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

„hirnlos“

Bitte verzichte zukünftig auf derartige Beleidigungen. Es ist nicht meine Aufgabe, irgendwelche falschen Links zu fixen, die Suchfunktion ist bekanntlich auch nicht die beste. --Polarlys 20:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery

Trees dont generally fall across roads and crush cars, but they did in this case. I would agree with you that pictures of fallen trees are redundant, but there are plenty of others on commons to use, say this one, this one (or 06.JPG), this one and maybe this one, but there must be a better image of a car/railway line/road blocked with a tree. Good job on keeping the article up to date. RHB ^{Talk - Edits} 18:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work

Hi, wanted to thank you for your work on the article about this winter storm in Europe. Surely, those who got stuck in the mess probably won't get to read it soon as they have much bigger fish to fry at the moment, but those who are stuck at the distance with their worry (or plain panicking like myself :) might find such central point of up-to-date and balanced info especially useful. Best wishes and regards - Introvert • ~ 08:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tool for Education or American propaganda

Is Wikipedia a resource for education and carrying FACTS or a tool for American propaganda? I have edited out reticules claims by Americans in the Land speed record for railed vehicles and Empire State Express only to have arrogant Americans delete them and accuse me of pov can we have a neutral observer look at these sections Oxyman 02:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, by the way, I'm an arrogant German as you may have figured out had you ever looked at my user page, not an arrogant American as you have written in your multi-page hate spree. And as such, I am off to bed to steal your beach towel tomorrow. Meanwhile, have a look at WP:CITE, WP:NPOV and especially meta:Don't be a dick. Goodnight. --doco (☏) 02:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Yo acused Insulting Americans for putting oficially recorded FACTS on pages I sugest you view the pages you talk ofOxyman 02:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

On 4 February, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Berlin Stadtbahn, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 23:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. MakeChooChooGoNow 18:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from an article. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MakeChooChooGoNow 18:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prod Copmanthorpe rail crash

Regarding your proposal that the article Copmanthorpe rail crash be deleted. I do not agree with this proposal and as such have removed the template as per the instructions and explained my objection on the talk page and seek clarification of your reasons. Thanks. Adambro 13:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplikate

Kannst du bitte auf deinen Unterseiten alle Bahndiagramm-Duplikate ersetzen ? Die Liste steht hier. Es geht um die Icons, welche irgendwo ein "STB" im Namen haben. Danke. 84.150.215.245 11:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aldi "Junk"

Please do not remove or refer to grammatical and factual corrections in the Aldi Article as "Junk". Show the same respect to fellow Wikipedians and their contributions as you would expect from them. Danke.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:EDEKA-Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EDEKA-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nuvola Firefox icon.png

Hello Doco, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Nuvola Firefox icon.png) was found at the following location: User:Doco. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 17 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article München-Nürnberg-Express, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 15:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am a Hungarian user! I can't speak English :( Your have a bug your page! Please test all language link!

WP:TRAIL for WP:RM

I have put WP:TRAIL up for a requested move as i feel it has expanded beyond what it was originally intended and has multiple uses and usages. Need name. Simply south 12:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Logo Plus Warenhandel.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo Plus Warenhandel.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:33, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Furry

Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board.

Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing!

You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 22:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

on DB class 628

Hello. I found yourUser:Doco/sandbox/DB Class 628 from Template:DB class 628 while searching other template. I wonder why you don't move it to DB Class 628. It has enough contents. If you think that the article needs polished up, please use Wikipedia:Translation/*/How-to#Proofreading stage. Thank you.Penpen0216 01:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)(I'm a Japanese. There may be some wrong sentences. Sorry.)[reply]

another request

There is another request. I translated Buchli drive from Germany to English. But section See also remains unlinked. Honestly speaking I am poor at English and German. I use machine translation for help. (I translated it as a step of making Japanese article.) So would you please translate Hohlwellen-Antrieb, Tatzlager-Antrieb and Einzelachsantrieb ? (I don't know their English equivalent.) If you translate these articles, I will translate them to Japanese. Thank you.

Image source problem with Image:Bofhlogo.svg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bofhlogo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. nadav (talk) 21:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is non-free as the tag indicates, then a fair use rationale must also be included. nadav (talk) 21:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BOGESTRA.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BOGESTRA.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bsag.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bsag.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ARD-Dachmarke.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:ARD-Dachmarke.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DR-03-0078-adn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DR-03-0078-adn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GVH Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GVH Logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 19:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Manfred Woerner.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Manfred Woerner.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany/Transportation

Could you take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany/Transportation where you are a member. There has been an issue with the banner effecting the WP Germany banner. It should be included as a taskforce anyway, but the scope of your project is rather unclear. Could you help clarify? Agathoclea (talk) 13:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]