User talk:Doc O'Kearney
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
The biography of a living person https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon_Lark has been placed up for deletion and talks came to no consensus. The objections to deletion appear to be from a single editor. Three editors moved to delete, one "weak". I also move to delete (4 delete, 1 keep, 1 weak). Shannon Lark contacted me and asked for assistance to delete.
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIODEL this qualifies for deletion. The article is poorly written and fails neutrality. Notability is dubious. The value of the article is suspect. Some of the information seems incorrect, other information appears nonfactual in nature. The article has been tagged for at least several years. However, I don't want to simply delete the text. If it cannot be deleted, surely it can be stubbified. Please assist in deletion. Many thanks.
- Ok, I see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Lark was from 2011. I think it's too far back to really argue that discussion itself but we can list it for deletion again and see if there are more concerns. Would that help? The article does seem to be citing a bunch of things but I'm not clear if it's not accurate or are we missing something more of what the issues could be. If Ms. Lark is concerned, the best thing for her to do is [read the guidelines for article subjects. The best way is to communicate through a volunteer who can then help us figure out what the problems are and see if we can correct them. If you need any more help, feel free to contact me at my talk page. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Doc O'Kearney, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Doc O'Kearney! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts |