User talk:Dmitry Brant/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Dmitry Brant. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
What does it take?
What does it take to get an administrator to look at the problem with Knight's tour? It is at noticeboard and every one on the list has been addressed except this one. Even all of the ones that are more recent. Bubba73 (talk), 14:26, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Now a 24-hour block. Bubba73 (talk), 15:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Somehow I think we haven't seen the last of him. A 24-hour block will only crank him up even more. Dmitry Brant (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
"Not notable"
I do not see how what I added to the article is "not notable". This was a national news event, and a belief held but many people around the world. I even included it with a strong referance, which displayed Commissioner John Wiley Price of Dallas backing up this belief. Of course, as a white man yourself, you may not feel the pain and hatred that comes from a racist society and would do everything to try and stop the truth coming out. And you're comment "use the talk page to discuss further changes"? This is a wiki, to be edited by the people for the people. It should not be policed and patrolled to only let information that is deemed fit by white editors to be displayed. 93.96.182.208 (talk) 12:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- You are taking a generalisation of YouTube videos as non-notable sources. That makes as much sense as an interview in the NYT being a non-notable source. I think that you may be mixing up notability and reliability. I was not presenting the source as the sole occurance of this hatred, but just one example of it. If you think of the English language as the idea that the term "black-hole" is a racist one, then that referance is just an utterance. It seems exteremley strange, and very offensive, to me that you view this as a misinterpretation, the use of "wtf" in the revert comment showed that you are enetirely disregarding the thoughts and feelings of another race, of another person. However, I wish to stay neutral in this. Therefore, when I put it onto the page, I referenced it from a reliable source (straight from the mouth of a Counciller) and used the term "some people". I am only telling the truth, am I not? If it is your wish to remove truth from an enyclopedia, then surely you are working backwards?
93.96.182.208 (talk) 13:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for your reply. I am not black, and nor do I find the term, or your list of terms, offensive. All I did was include something in the article which was referenced and sourced reliably. Do you fail to see the truth of, not what was said, but the fact that he said it? I find that truth hard to miss. I thought that Wikipedia was an open encyclopedia, documenting facts that can interest and teach people all over the globe. If I am wrong in that pretence then I do apologise. 93.96.182.208 (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
License tagging for File:En-Laika.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:En-Laika.ogg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Big Bang recording
Hi, I listened to your Big Bang recording. Good job--you have a good voice and good intonation. "Monsignor" should be pronounced "mon-senior" though. Keep them coming! :P --Mangst (talk) 01:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note! Will do... Dmitry Brant (talk) 19:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- Can we remove the notice on the talk page now? RockMagnetist (talk) 17:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note! Will do... Dmitry Brant (talk) 19:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
IEEE technical societies
If you are a member of one or more of the IEEE technical societies, you may wish to identify yourself as such on Wikipedia. I’ve created Wikipedian categories for each of the 38 IEEE technical societies. The new Template:User IEEE member creates a userbox identifying the society and your membership grade and includes your user page in the relevant Wikipedian category. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note. Yours aye, Buaidh 18:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC) — IEEE Life Member
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| For alerting sysops to a repeatedly recreated spam page. Bearian (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2014 (UTC) |
Jack Craciun lll and George J. Wienbarg lll
Did your nomination of Jack Craciun for deletion have anything to do with your mutual place of residence Cleveland. If it had to be deleted then so be it, but, could I have not have had time to sign on and respond? Then you jumped to Peter Brant II are you related?Masterknighted (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC) It seems like you had not made an edit in a great while before these, why would you swoop in low to cut the tops off these trees, is it something personal?Masterknighted (talk) 13:21, 3 June 2014 (UTC) So, since it came down under the presumed circumstances that I was some sort of viagra influenced lower case Roman numeral spammer, then therefore you guys should perhaps assist me in putting it back up.... Look at the Wienbarg sources carefully he has produced a documentary, acted, been a broadcast journalist as well as having marketed the remnants of the hollywood sign and being the nephew of the most famous American of his time Buffalo Bill Cody.. It is possible you jumped the gun i don't want to reference Annie Oakley but....; There ares sources in there such as the Washington Post, I believe he is notable and should not be sent unwittingly to the deletion drop floor, thanksMasterknighted (talk) 20:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Technical Barnstar |
| For being an integral part of the release of a great Wikipedia app! (ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 05:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC) |
Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.
Thanks,
Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for the audio recordings. They are much enjoyed. Chackerian (talk) 09:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC) |
Mobile app suggestions
Dear Dmitry;
Thanks for your good work on the Mobile app. Without you, I would have not been able to contribute fruitfully to Wikipedia. So, kudos! On a related subject, I would like to suggest some improvement to the app from the viewpoint of a Wikipedia user who works entirely on the app. here are some of the suggestions that come to my mind now. I will update the list if I remember any more.
- Userpage accessibility: I would like to access my userpage from the left hand side menu.
- Notifications: I would like to access my notifications from inside the app.
- Built in edit history: It would be easier if I could access the page edit history from inside the app.
Disconnected from Wikipedia Zero notification: Only if this notification appeared in the same place the "This page is semi-protected" message is shown. I rely on Wikipedia Zero which is provided by Umniah here, and I tell you, they are misers. My connection breaks and reconnects about 3 times a second, so the notification becomes very irksome.- Article Marker: As a guy who opens up about 53 tabs in the same time, it becomes irritating when an article starts over from the beginning when I switch from and to it, especially with long articles. If you can include a "bookmark" feature on articles to mark the line I am reading for later, life will become 53 times easier.
- Editing screen: Can the editing screen become part of the tab? I would love to switch between articles while editing, as my usual work here is translating English articles to Arabic.
- Preview: In an editing screen, there should be a "Save" button besides "Next". When I correct typos, I do not want to preview my edits before I publish them, especially that my (free) internet offer for Wikipedia is very slow and sluggish (thanks Umniah) and I would love to spare the minute of waiting that the app spends on fetching the preview.
- Open in new tab: When I click on a hyperlink, a preview of the article is shown. I would love if the "Open in new tab" was more accessible, possibly in the place of the "read article" button, as clicking on the title does that job.
- Image size: The mobile app does not know the difference between 50px images and 300px ones. My userboxes, although they look fine in the app, looked diseasterous in the browser and I was none the wiser. Please fix.
- No section jumping when loading: The right hand menu is a very great idea, but it faces a problem in long articles. When the article is first opened, it loads and finishes displaying the text. Yet, another loading occurs after the text is diplayed (I do not know why, I am no programmer). The problem here is that the right hand menu becomes useless until the loading finishes (when the blue line reaches the end). This is very irksome and is very noticeable on long articles such as WP:MOS.
- Exceptions to hyperlink preview: Nearly all hyperlinks show a preview of the article when clicked on, but there are exceptions, namely "wikipedia:" and "help:" and "user:" pages, and most of the hyperlinks written in italics (Almost all hyperlinks linking to books and films and games are written in italics, which makes it difficult).
- The section hyperlinks never work: links such as Steve Jobs#Death never land me in that particular section.
Thank you in advance. Please, if you reply, use the {{ping|SammyMajed}} template. Thank you again.
• Sammy Majed • Talk • Creations • Wikipedia Arabic • 14:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Follow-up
nice update, a bit laggy, yes, but good overall. I am going to report bugs to you in the village pump. I noticed that the new reading list feature erased all my saved pages, which pissed me off provided that I saved over a hundred articles. Thanks;
• Sammy Majed • Talk • Creations • Wikipedia Arabic • 08:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the suggestions (and sorry for the delayed response)! Yes, please do report any bugs that you see, and ping my name so that I get notified. If I may ask: from which version of the app were you upgrading? The Reading List feature has been around for over a year. If you upgraded from a version earlier than that, it might explain why your previous saved pages weren't migrated properly. P.S. I like all your userboxes, and agree with 99.9% of them, except the one about Vegemite (speaking in a personal / non-official capacity). Dmitry Brant (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The WikiLoop Battlefield monthly barnstar
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, Dmitry Brant You have been recognized as the monthly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield weekly barnstar
|
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, Dmitry Brant You have been recognized as the weekly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
Rollback granted
Hi Dmitry Brant. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 16:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
Dear Dmitry Brant,
Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.
Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 18:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi Dmitry Brant/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
Test
just a test of the Talk feature in the Wikipedia app. Dmitry Brant (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Was this message received? Dbrant testing (talk) 13:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Yes, it was! Dmitry Brant (talk) 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Hello again! Dmitry Brant (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
One more reply. Dmitry Brant (talk) 16:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello, and welcome! Dmitry Brant (talk) 19:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello, and welcome! Dmitry Brant (talk) 19:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI Dmitry Brant/Archive 1,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Push notifications test
This is another test of Push notifications. Dbrant testing (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- And a reply Dbrant testing (talk) 20:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello!
This is a message from an IP user, to check whether it generates an app notification. 173.76.103.59 (talk) 19:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
And hello to you! Dmitry Brant (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello again!
This is another test of push notifications. Dbrant testing (talk) 14:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Another test
Testing GMS notifications. Dbrant testing (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
This is to get @Dbrant testing:'s attention. Dmitry Brant (talk) 14:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This is to get @Dbrant testing:'s attention. Dmitry Brant (talk) 14:52, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
new topic
this is a test! 173.76.103.59 (talk) 15:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
hello again 173.76.103.59 (talk) 14:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
test!! Dbrant testing (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
message!!! Dbrant testing (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- this is a reply to a message. 173.76.103.59 (talk) 17:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a response. 173.76.103.59 (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- one more response. Dmitry Brant (talk) 15:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Test account
Just wanted to check in: do you still have access to your testing account? I happened to notice a vandalism edit from that account yesterday and wanted to make sure everything's alright with it on your end. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @JalenFolf: Hi there - terribly sorry: my intention was to test the triggering of the abuse filter as part of an investigation into a bug in the Wikipedia Android app, but I mistakenly made the edit while logged in, whereas that filter only applies to non-confirmed users. You rolled back the edit within the ~5 seconds in which I realized the mistake, otherwise I would have rolled it back myself. Sorry again for any confusion. Dmitry Brant (talk) 21:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
On-Board Diagnostics
Hi- I am having a difficult time identifying the problems with a recent edit of this page. I have tried to correct errors and improve the accuracy of the history shown. Please advise. W9kfb (talk) 16:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up! It looks like you were trying to add references to an IEEE journal, and also adding a reference to yourself as a Wikipedia author (?), but the IEEE references were not correctly formatted. To add a reference to a journal, you probably want to use Template:Cite journal, instead of just putting the raw reference text in curly braces. For more general documentation on references, please see the help pages. Dmitry Brant (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Knightstour24x24.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, superseded by File:Knight's Tour 24x24.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
"grievous grammar"
I love your summary of your recent edit of Black Hole. In my dialect (British) "grievous bodily harm" is legalese for a serious assualt - does that work for you too? Philcha (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Black Pearl (disambiguation)
And don't slip in a minor reference at the end of a disambiguation page when the entire point is that: BIOLOGY --- this is why all these references make sense. Literally not doing your "job" here, the fact that they exist is *why* all of these other references exist.
Be better. It might be a really, really good reason for the edit you reflectively "undid".
Be Seeing You.
Dmitry Brant -- weird. You do not appear to exist on your national database, for driver's license or tax. Wyrd. *taps nose* — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:E226:9600:30C5:9195:22C6:24C1 (talk) 02:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- I undid your edit because it contained a bunch of text in all-caps. Your newest edits appear to be perfectly valid and relevant, and I encourage you to keep editing. *taps nose* Dmitry Brant (talk) 02:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)