User talk:DmitryVasily

April 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Donetsk, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 18:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tsardom of Kazan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{officeholder
|party = [[United Russia (Russian Federation)|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tsardom of Kazan

Hello DmitryVasily,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tsardom of Kazan for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 20:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry Vasilyevich Romanov Konstantinov

Hello, please provide sources for these additions to various articles. Claims such as these require quality sourcing. Electric Wombat (talk) 23:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That may very well be, but we cannot include this kind of information unless it is covered in a reliable source, such as a newspaper, magazine, journal, etc. There is plenty of sourcing to include the Romanovs, for example, so that's why they're here. Electric Wombat (talk) 23:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The inclusion criteria are here: notability requirements, and sources that can be used to establish the first link. Electric Wombat (talk) 23:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Go ahead and list the sources. Depending on context, official government reports can be acceptable. Electric Wombat (talk) 00:03, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - In the meantime, I'm going to tag this article, as we can't have an empty article with no sources hanging about. Electric Wombat (talk) 00:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dmitry Vasilyevich Romanov Konstantinov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dmitry Vasilyevich Romanov Konstantinov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Electric Wombat (talk) 00:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DmitryVasily (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am in current negations with the Russian Government over my claims to the Thrones DmitryVasily (talk) 22:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Feel free to return when you can document your success. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.