User talk:Djug

Welcome!

Hello, Djug, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Geniac (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can some one help me to figure when i should flag for deletion ?

Hey there. Your best bet is to check out our deletion policy and see whether the articles you're concerned with meet any of the conditions there. Usually speedy deletions of articles are carried out when the topic is not notable - you can look at the criteria for speedy deletions for more information there. If it's not a speedy candidate, then you can consider proposed deletion, which is slower but effective; finally, there's articles for deletion where other editors will discuss any articles nominated for deletion and an administrator will make a decision. Hope this helps! If you've got any more questions, drop a note on my talk page. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User template messages where?

{{helpme}} Where do I put user template messages such as vandalism warnings, on talk page? or main?

A warning message is like any other thing you write to a user, so it goes on their user talk page. So, to warn me, you'd put it on User talk:Chzz. Note the instructions usually say you have to subst it, see WP:WARN.

Use 'preview' to check the warning makes sense before saving it. Cheers, Chzz ► 19:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Helen Kerr

Hello Djug, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Helen Kerr, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see above that you are asking for advice. The point about this one is that to escape an WP:CSD#A7 speedy does not require demonstrating notability, or even having any references; any credible assertion of importance or significance is enough. ("Johnny is the coolest dude in the universe" is an assertion of importance, but is not credible). Read WP:CSD carefully, especially the actual definitions and the section "Non-criteria". There is good advice from an experienced admin at WP:A7M and WP:10CSD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Djug! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Djug,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]