User talk:Djarra

Welcome!

Hello, Djarra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 16:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Re-booting Magic WikiProject

Following various discussions and posts on the project talk page I've drafted a new version of the project page. In particular it seeks to clarify aspects of the structure of the project and guidelines regarding publication of magic methods. Contacting you to ask for your opinion because you are one of a small group of users who have recently given constructive input to magic articles. The draft is posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Magic/draft magic project page. Despite linking off the project talk page and posting an announcement on the Community bulletin board there doesn't seem to have been any response yet. Any comments from you would be valued.-- Circusandmagicfan 16:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Resfm.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Resfm.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 82.7.223.6 expired. Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 03:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hm... I notice that the account and IP address you've mentioned both seem to be editing the same page you have. Likewise, the IP address doesn't appear to be shared among any large number of people. Do you have an explanation for this apparent coincidence? – Luna Santin (talk) 00:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because the person sitting next to me at work was trying to be funny and I was trying to undo what she had done.

Nomination of Gunther Burpus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gunther Burpus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunther Burpus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TJRC (talk) 00:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GLASSsHRIMP for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GLASSsHRIMP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GLASSsHRIMP until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Galaxy Craze

The article Galaxy Craze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actress/novelist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]