User talk:Discospinster/Archive24

The deletion of the page "Ak Welsapar"

Hello, i am the the one who uploaded the page "Ak Welsapar" and i would like to know why it was deleted. The copyright belongs to The Publishing House Gün, and i am the PR manager there. The copyright was written both in the text and on the talkpage.

Best regards, Michael --Pribiblioinfo (talk) 19:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Alberta SPCA

Hi! Thanks so much for your help. I have included references in the article as mentioned in the guidelines and saved the copy in my sandbox. However, I am still not sure how to move the article out of sandbox and publish it. Also, the references are under a list of numbers, not sure what I am doing wrong. If you could help me out with this, that would be great. Thanks again.Tarun23 (talk) 19:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of World Championships (Table Hockey) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Championships (Table Hockey) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Championships (Table Hockey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. dci | TALK 22:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Hofstra university honors college

dude i spent like 2 hours on the hofstra university honors college page, and you went ahead and deleted 3/4 of it. what the hell!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.133.42 (talk) 00:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

The content I removed was copied from http://www.hofstra.edu/Academics/Colleges/HUHC/, which is a violation of copyright. ... discospinster _talk 01:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Afluenta

Hello Discospinster. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Afluenta, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Yangfit

Hi, can you have a look at Yangfit for me please to make sure I marked it correctly for deletion

Thanks Gavbadger (talk) 04:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

(passer-by comment) RHaworth obviously agreed. I'd say borderline, and would have prodded for notability as well just in case. It couldn't be a case for A7, as it's not a company or person or webcontent. If it had been Yangfit Inc, I'd have put A7 not prod. Spam things, you have to be careful. If they're blatant like 'we make the finest blodgers in the union, and 98% of Arizona'a poggy snafflers use nothing but our blodgers', there's no query. Even if it's true (usually dubious...). Some spam writers are getting wise and dropping the PR speak. If it's neutral to pass CSD, it can always be prodded or AfDed if you're convinced of the intention. Sometimes this results in a sound article - which is the real object of being here. Sorry to DQ for sticking my nose in... Peridon (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, that's pretty much what I thought too. ... discospinster _talk 15:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Trista DiGiuseppi

I've deleted it - looks all self-published. The alleged 'Six letters' publisher is lulu. The article looks to have been a copyvio of the goodreads profile, which isn't an RS anyway. (Didn't delete for that - found it later... Worth noting in case it reappears. Peridon (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Hacker Defender

Don't know how to deal with this one on New Page Patrol. It seems to have a linked downloadable zip file that could contain the virus - there appears no speedy delete cat to deal with this. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 16:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

David Lewer

Many thanks, for some reason I couldn't work out how to capitalise the title once I'd hit save! Best regards, Dave — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave Briggs (talk • contribs) 17:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Educa

Hold your horses mate, I decided to add to the article before contesting the deletion (which is the only way that makes sense to me - provide value first, then properly assess the new state of the article). In the meantime I see that you've deleted the article which disheartens me but I will give this another try. You can look at my talk page to see the article's new state: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Makeybussines (I don't know if you can see my sandbox so used the talk instead). I'd love for you to tell me what else I can do to justify the article. I'm quite knowledgeable about the New Zealand Early Childhood Sector (it's what I work with), and plan to add more stuff here and there but if you make it too hard on me I'm gonna give up right away, this is not the attitude I was looking for. --Makeybussines (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC) Thank you for the information provided, is the article 'good enough' in its new version or does it require further additions? Makeybussines (talk) 23:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Kurusha Magzub

Kurusha Magzub is an obvious hoax to me. The references at the bottom don't mention him, and googling the Persian name shows nothing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:54, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Woody ty

Would you mind leaving this Woody ty fellow a message, asking him not leave messages like this on my talk page? I would prefer if an admin. did it, as it is clear he has no intention of listening to me. Thank you. ---RepublicanJacobite_TheFortyFive 03:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Mutabar Tadjibayeva

Uzbek defender human rights

Hi Discospinster, I'm a new user in wikipedia, and I don't speak english very well. So before deleted my article I need your help about language and about the rules of wikipedia. There's I try to put the reference for my article, BUT it's not same cod in french, Please help me to editing this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xursand.abdullayev (talk • contribs)

Language Marketplace

Hi Discospinster! I am working on my first article here on Wikipedia. You just moved it to my user space. I just wanted to know can we move it back to public space when I have done properly citing it? SteveBeattie (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. SteveBeattie (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC).

Thank you!

Thank you for several contributions to Yahoo! litigation. (yes this article is a mess :-) Ottawahitech (talk) 15:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Issues

I respect your opinon on deleting the Elliott Clayton article. However, you need to respect mine. I simply do not believe that the character is non-notable, because first of all, the character appears in a television series. Please explain to me why the character is, in your opinon, non-notable so we can come to an agreemant. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starshuttle888 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Blood Drenched Altars

Hello Discospinster,

You deleted a page today for very legitimate reasons; the name of the thread was "Blood drenched altars." My friends were playing a joke on me (Drew Chambers) for my birthday and I didn't see the page before it was rightfully taken down. Is there any way you could just send me the text of the page please? I would really appreciate it.

Thank you very much, Drew Chambers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.72.210.208 (talk) 02:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

I have placed it temporarily at User:Discospinster/Blood drenched altars. I will be deleting it again tomorrow. ... discospinster _talk 02:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

I'd go to see that band... Brocach (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Supreme Rocket Productions

hello that is the right page... as you can see some imbecil misspelled the name of the company and had to do another page because of that... do not delete Supreme Rocket Productions... delete the other page that ends in Productios instead of Productions.. thank you.. are both apges made by me... so no copyrighting issues here... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anaphoto (talk • contribs) 07:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks ...

... for the barnstar. I do actually feel I deserve this one. Cheers. -- ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ ^{[your turn]} 03:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Liam O'Neill (GAA President)

Thanks for moving the content to its proper home Liam O'Neill, which had previously been blocked. I have now redirected the few links that pointed to the Liam O'Neill (GAA President) page, so could you please delete that, which is no longer needed as a redirect? Brocach (talk) 17:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Done. ... discospinster _talk 18:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

And I see thaty you tracked down and disposed of the one stray link. Good work. Brocach (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

I am nothing if not thorough! ... discospinster _talk 18:35, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Hasan Mahmud

The reason for the names you reverted was that several articles which link to Hasan Mahmud intend the Bengali politician. We can fix them, but they are likely to happen again. Do you have a solution? — kwami (talk) 00:23, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Let Me Be There and If You Love Me (Let Me Know)

I keep having to play whack a mole on these articles — revert revert revert, requesting page locks, etc. I'm just going around in circles here and really want to put an end to this. The editors are on dynamic IPs so a rangeblock won't work. What do you suggest to end this? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

All I can think of is an indefinite protection from anon editing, and immediate blocking for any signed-in user that makes the same changes. ... discospinster _talk 18:04, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

• Would putting "Navin Harris" into Wikipedia:Edit filter be a good idea? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:04, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm not too familiar with the way edit filters work. Would that immediately revert, or just put a note in the edit summary? ... discospinster _talk 18:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

It looks like it can be set to do various things depending on who makes the filter — it could auto-revert any attempt to put that in the article, or outright disallow adding it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Maybe it can't hurt to request one. ... discospinster _talk 18:18, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of Wang Haibo

Hello. As you may know, the page of Wang Haibo was deleted. This was due to several people who had contributed to the page without sourcing correctly.

See, this Wang Haibo is not a real person; he is a rather famous fictitious character whom had garnered a cult following across several popular Facebook sites. He has become recognised by tens of thousands of people, some of whom have come to literally worship him. His significance in such tales as "The Rise of Gangneung City" and "The Bigger They Are, The Harder They Fall: A Story of James Fleming" surely merits a Wikipedia page. If monitored regularly, it can become a verified and reputable page with well-sourced information.

A "cult following" is generally not enough to sustain a Wikipedia article. Subjects must be notable per certain criteria. ... discospinster _talk 16:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

May I ask what criteria is that? I'm sure Wang Haibo fulfils it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.106.20 (talk) 16:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The general notability guideline can be found here: WP:GNG. The topic must have received significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 16:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

This YouTube video is a spoof of a legit interview between Mei Li-Yo, a young Korean television presenter, and Zuahang Chung, who voiced Wang Haibo in several viral videos. The station, STARKOREA, has unfortunately closed last month, although I believe that it should not be too hard to find archived videos elsewhere on YouTube. Haibo, besides being a fictional character with a cult following, is also an internet celebrity; which seems to have been enough for Allison Harvard to sustain a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.106.20 (talk) 16:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Wang Haibo Deletion

Hey Mate,

I just wanted to say, there are no hard feelings about deleting the page, I know it was immature of me. Once again, apologies.

Wang Haibo

Not sure this was a clear-cut G10: the negative information had been repeatedly inserted by IPs after the article had been created, and I had written an entry at WP:RPP. Not quite an A7 either, though it was definitely a BLP-Prod. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The original author had added "While roaming the streets of Gangneung, selling himself as a prostitute" to the article, before any IPs had even got to it. The article itself was created with the intention of violating BLP, or at the very least, to vandalize. ... discospinster _talk 18:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Reliability guidelines are not as important as accuracy

With your edit of platinum, I already stated that "reliability" was not as important as what is correct. While you certainly can't be using Yahoo answers as a source, nobody can deny that my sources can be considered reliable. While my sense of understanding about Wikipedia's rules is not very strong, can we please sort this out before you start reverting all of my edits just because it doesn't meet some biased (judging based on who wrote it, where it came from, and when) requirement? I'm not trying to cause trouble, but to contribute, and it doesn't make you feel better when people are buzzing you with a one-sided view. --96.242.163.228 (talk) 21:47, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

I reverted your edit because it was not carefully done (it repeated words in the paragraph), and there was no need to delete the existing reference. ... discospinster _talk 21:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

We can put the reference part later in the article, but I still believe that that source was wrong in terms of etymology. --96.242.163.228 (talk) 21:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Namespace

D'oh, thanks. DMacks (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. ... discospinster _talk 01:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hacketstown and Vandalism

Hi Discospinster, I have tried to deal with Vandalism by User:Crake69, User:Andrewbyrne70 and User:193.61.159.20 on Hacketstown article, but slightly unsure how to deal with edits by User:193.61.159.20 other pages, any advice, and can this user be blocked? Thanks Mrchris (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

It seems to have died down for the moment, so blocking wouldn't be necessary. The IP is probably not the same person every day, since the edits don't follow a pattern. I've placed the article on my watchlist, and if there is further vandalism from a similar IP I will block it right away. ... discospinster _talk 21:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks 19:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)~

Unnoticed edit on Premeditated murder

Hello.

The editor has made one more edit which should be removed. See the page history. Thanks. 75.53.218.81 (talk) 01:37, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I've removed it and blocked the user. ... discospinster _talk 01:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I filed an oversight request believing that was the appropriate action, but, after looking further into it, I saw what you have done and why. Thank you again. 75.53.218.81 (talk) 01:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

By the way, I know this is irrelevant to this post, however, since I just noticed this, and since you are an administrator currently online, I would like to report to you that there is an edit war on Joe Francis. See the page history. Thanks. 75.53.218.81 (talk) 01:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, I've placed a note on the talk page and will keep an eye on it. ... discospinster _talk 02:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Page blanking

Why did you revert SWEvojo123 (talk · contribs) when he blanked the Vojislav Milojevic page. Since that user was the only editor to have made any substantive edits on the page, sure this would have qualified as an author requested deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I hadn't realized that s/he was the only contributor. ... discospinster _talk 13:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

thanks

Hi Disco - thanks for cleaning up some of the crap at masculism. It had been on my to-do list for a while. Be aware that articles in that group tend to attract massive numbers of off-site trolls, and sometimes significant harassment (including offsite/irl harassment) to editors involved in cleaning them up to encyclopedic standards. (any article related to men's rights, which will include masculism, are also under community sanctions imposed by ANI some time ago.. which make it easier to deal with the really problematic editors they sometimes attract.) Kevin Gorman (talk) 16:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

No problem. I expect to get complaints from both sides, and it'll never satisfy everyone, but as long as it can be kept neutral then we're doing our jobs! ... discospinster _talk 19:24, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Six PAC

Hi, I need to ask your opinion on the above article. I tagged it for speedy deletion at 23:05 on 23rd April because it clearly didn't meet WP:ORG. 14 minutes later the creating editor tagged it with {{newpage}} and another user subsequently removed the speedy deletion tag as a result.

Nobody has edited the article for the last 36 hours, and I still don't think it meets our notability criteria. At what point is it acceptable to say this is no longer a new page and is therefore eligible to be nominated for deletion? Or is that the wrong approach to take? -- role^player 19:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

It's not clear from the history whether the editor removed the tag on purpose, since there's nothing about it in the edit summary or on the talk page. Just to be on the safe side, better go with a proposed deletion if you still feel that it's not an appropriate article. Or you could move it to user space. ... discospinster _talk 19:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I have PROD'd it. I debated over that one following your response, and it was the fact that it's a bit advert-y and the website was launched the same day the article was created that swung it to prodtown for me. Thanks for looking at it for me. -- role^player 20:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

PS what is the inspiration behind the name discospinster? -- role^player 20:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

It's quite simple, really. I like disco, and I'm a spinster. :) ... discospinster _talk 20:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

{{Uw-attack}}

Hello.

I would like to (since I do not have the ability to do so) request an edit to the above template, to be changed in a similar way as to the way I did so here when the wording was unsuitable. I would also like to request that there be something like ",as you did at {{{1}}}" be added to it as well. I would also like to request your comment on a couple of other edit requests which I made at Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace. Thanks. 75.53.218.81 (talk) 01:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Well I'm not very handy with templates so I wouldn't be able to make the change myself. Maybe you could add another edit request like you did with {{uw-delete2}}? ... discospinster _talk 16:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

I was asking you personally since my existing request appears to remain unanswered. Do you know any active administrator who I can personally contact for my request? Thanks very much in advance. 75.53.218.81 (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, as for adding the parameter {{1}}, it used to be there but then it was removed following a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace/Archive 12#tweak of Template:Uw-attack. The wording change to add "or make any other insertions to Wikipedia" seems OK to me, although maybe {{uw-vand}} would achieve the same goal? Maybe the reason it's not already in the attack template is because we don't want to bring attention to the edit (whereas an attack page can be deleted altogether).

You might be able to find more help from one of the editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject user warnings#Participants. User:Anomie, for example, is an administrator and pretty active. ... discospinster _talk 20:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Montrose - Paper Money album

In reading the entry for the album Led Zeppelin II at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Led_Zeppelin_2, I see what appears to a 'review' under the 'composition' section. If Led Zeppelin can have a review, so should Montrose. ~~WM~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimonstro (talk • contribs) 02:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism

You beat me to the edits on the Co-operative page here: [1] Just a note that I already added a vandalism warning to the user page so no need to add another one. Thanks Jwikiediting (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

I see you already added a warning. Sorry! You're too quick for me! Jwikiediting (talk) 16:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Yours was posted first, so I removed my duplicate warning. ... discospinster _talk 16:39, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Okay thanks. Jwikiediting (talk) 17:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Champak

User Talk : Napsync = Please do not stick useless tags on the Champak article. There are enough citations for the article, you can check them. The articles has not been merged into one another, you can check it in the talk of the following article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napsync (talk • contribs) 02:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

for more information for the purity of the champak article go to the following link: Talk: Champak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napsync (talk • contribs) 03:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC) --Napsync (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I like your tags on your userpage but i can't get'em b'coz i can't see them. I can't edit your page but yeah your tags was awesome.... Great ..... Have a Good Day

Napsync (talk) 03:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi there! I just wanted to pop in to quickly thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page last night. I think we crossed paths a couple times while RC-patrolling. Nice job all around, and keep up the good work! : ) Evanh2008 (talk) (contribs) 23:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. And thank you also for your work on the site. ... discospinster _talk 00:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald

When you have a moment, can you take a look at this, and the recent edit history related to it? I regard this message as a personal attack, from an editor who has made a number of other personal comments about me, which is why I removed it, it has now been restored. I am not going to remove it again, but I do not believe that this is covered by WP:TALK, as the restoring editor claims. If any editor wants to discuss these matters in a civil manner, I am more than willing to do so, but I do not believe that I, or any editor, has to tolerate this kind of attack. I would like very much to hear your opinion. Thanks for your time. ---RepublicanJacobite_TheFortyFive 01:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't think it's quite enough of an attack to be removed from the talk page, although it is surely uncivil. There is some substantive content in there, if you can get past the tone. I've reminded the user on the talk page to rein it in. ... discospinster _talk 14:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Much appreciated. Since last night, a civil discussion of the issues involved has begun, and I think it will be worked out. Thanks again, not just for this, but for just being here and involved. ---RepublicanJacobite_TheFortyFive 14:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for removing that hideous threat from an IP off my talk page. I am literally shaking with anger and upset by it at the same time. Am I within my right to have the IP blocked for that? It isn't the first time they have posted attacks against users. I have removed loads of them from article talk pages today, as well as restored talk page refactorings that they did. Wesley☀Mouse 16:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

I'll keep my eye on the IP. I can remove the comment completely from your talk page if you'd like. ... discospinster _talk 16:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

On second thought I've gone ahead and blocked the IP for a short while. ... discospinster _talk 16:17, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Feel free to completely remove it if you wish. I'm wondering if I should get my user page semi-protected just in case they backlash after the block expires, or attempt to use a different IP and attack me again. Wesley☀Mouse 16:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Saw you doing some reverts and beating me to quite a few of them, keep up the great work! Dan653 (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! ... discospinster _talk 01:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

I am editing info that is incorrect and vindictive

The whole article seem to be made up with media/newspaper citations. your article totally one sided and false.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viren14620 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

The citations in Nirmal Baba are not made up — you can click on them and see the newspaper articles. If you want to add another viewpoint it has to be backed up with sources. You can't just take out all of the information and replace it with a manifesto about how great he is. ... discospinster _talk 02:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Berak Obama

I would like to see a citation for the claim that Mr. Obama taught constitutional law -"and taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School from 1992 to 2004".- I have heard that he did not teach but that he was a guest lecturer which are not the same. Teaching is fact lecture is opinion. Thank You: Chad J Wilson--Chad Joseph Wilson (talk) 11:54, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

I will have a look. ... discospinster _talk 16:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

According to Fact Check, he was a senior lecturer, not a guest lecturer, meaning he did in fact teach the whole course and not just one class. The University of Chicago law school said that "he served as a professor", since senior lectures are regarded as professors. The citation can be found at Barack Obama#University of Chicago Law School and civil rights attorney. ... discospinster _talk 22:12, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Dead link in article 'Brian Melo'

Hi. The article 'Brian Melo' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKFHKEnFDME

• You added this in November 2007.
• The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots|deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 06:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi i bought this computer second hand.

I just got a warning from July 2010 in relation to vandalizing two articles. Im on a final warning in relation to being banned. I have no intention of editing any pages at present but may soon, I was hoping that before any banning you consult me first, as any previous vandalisations on this IP address dont refer to me. I would ask for the slate to be wiped clean but i can understand, my word alone isn't much proof. I have set up an account today to distinguish me from the previous owner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corkcitybone (talk • contribs) 20:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Recent Block Notice

Hi, the notice here is an IP notice not a user notice. I'd change it to the right one myself except I'd spend an hour looking for it! Thanks QU ^TalkQu 23:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

That's weird, Huggle must have changed the default. Thanks for letting me know, I'll fix it. ... discospinster _talk 23:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Rev. del.

Please can you revision delete this revision from Roshon Fegan. It seems to be purely disruptive. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 17:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Done. ... discospinster _talk 17:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Appreciate Your Awareness

Hey I was just experimenting & was about to remove this withing couple of minutes, BTW nice to see that people like you are aware and taking care of knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.238.139.145 (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Robbie the Pict

The other edits, yes were just stupid. The last however is not. His name is Brain Robertson, not Robbie the Pict. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.96.32 (talk) 23:45, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Recent incidents

Hello.

There were some recent incidents which I have expressed concern over, and it appears that another IP editor is intentionally portraying my edits as bad faith in retaliation for warning him or her for a blatantly inappropriate edit, in fact, an attack against a living person, at the sandbox. I had expressed that I never revert pages more than once and have always intended to make good faith edits to Wikipedia. Since you appear to be an active administrator, I am requesting that you contribute your administrator intervention to this case. I had initially posted about it here. Please let me know if you have any input. I had already figured that the abusive editor (68.120.81.4 (talk · contribs)) would refuse communication given the way that (s)he was behaving, and sure enough did, blanking all warnings from his or her talk page and had even requested speedy deletion under criterion U1 in attempt to hide my warning.

Again, please let me know what input you have in this case. Thanks very much in advance. 70.248.182.33 (talk) 00:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I've left a message on the user's talk page to try to get more information about the edits. ... discospinster _talk 01:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. In my opinion, it's likely to be blanked the way things are going. It appears that these reverts have been made in bad faith. If (s)he refuses to communicate, what's next? The editor already refused communication with the other administrator who I requested intervene. Thanks. 70.248.182.33 (talk) 01:10, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Supermassive black hole, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 20:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Are you sure that was meant for me? ... discospinster _talk 20:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Although it is true on some days, thanks for THIS. Morning277 (talk) 20:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. ... discospinster _talk 21:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my page

Thank you. I've reported the little charmer to WP:AIV. Seems quite WP-savvy, doesn't he? Frutti di Mare 21:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC).

My pleasure. ... discospinster _talk 21:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)