User talk:Disavian/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Disavian. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors
The article Legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. --Admiral Norton (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009
- News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
- Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
- News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
- Special report: Community weighs license update
- News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
- News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
- WikiProject report: WikiProject China
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- License update: Licensing vote begins
- News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
- Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Georgia Tech Cable Network
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Georgia Tech Cable Network, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Per WP:NOT#DIR and we are not a TV Guide.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NeutralHomer • Talk • April 16, 2009 @ 02:38 02:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Georgia Tech Cable Network
First off, please do not remove PROD tags. Let the PROD procedure run its course and let the admins have their say first. Second, a university cable company is not that notable. Several universities have them and Georgia Tech is the only one with a page dedicated to it....but it isn't notable. Verizon FiOS or Comcast, those are notable cable companies, this isn't. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 16, 2009 @ 05:53
- Perhaps you are confusing PROD with AFD? I've been here long enough to know that the notice you put on my talk page means what it says - any user can remove the tag for really any reason. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, not really. That would be an edit war. I have also been here long enough to know the rules. I can nom the page for AFD if you like....I would rather the admins have a look, but if you want it to go straight to AFD, that is fine with me. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 16, 2009 @ 06:29
- PROD isn't about having an admin look at it, it's just a low-pressure method of suggesting deletion. There really is no other way of interpreting "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason." From WP:PROD: "Proposed deletion is the way to suggest that an article is uncontroversially a deletion candidate, but that it does not meet the more stringent criteria for speedy deletion. If a PROD tag is added to an article, the article will be deleted about 5 days later if nobody objects. If any user objects—usually by removing the tag—then the article may be taken to Articles for Deletion for further discussion." —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, you wanted it nom'd for deletion (AFD), I nominated it. It will surely get deleted now. There was a chance that it might get saved with the PROD tag on there. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 16, 2009 @ 06:37
- PROD isn't about having an admin look at it, it's just a low-pressure method of suggesting deletion. There really is no other way of interpreting "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason." From WP:PROD: "Proposed deletion is the way to suggest that an article is uncontroversially a deletion candidate, but that it does not meet the more stringent criteria for speedy deletion. If a PROD tag is added to an article, the article will be deleted about 5 days later if nobody objects. If any user objects—usually by removing the tag—then the article may be taken to Articles for Deletion for further discussion." —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, not really. That would be an edit war. I have also been here long enough to know the rules. I can nom the page for AFD if you like....I would rather the admins have a look, but if you want it to go straight to AFD, that is fine with me. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 16, 2009 @ 06:29
AfD nomination of Georgia Tech Cable Network
I have nominated Georgia Tech Cable Network, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Tech Cable Network. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NeutralHomer • Talk • April 16, 2009 @ 06:32 06:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
- Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
- News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
- Dispatches: Valued pictures
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
- News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
- WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
References
Sorry, I did not know about archive.org, I just went to the reference and it said it wasn't found. Anyway, it seems like you messed up the references with your edit. The reference for fight songs, takes you to the page about the controversy. The reference for the controversy that you re-added is still the "dead" one. Brinkley32 (talk) 01:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Jeremy Farris.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jeremy Farris.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:GeorgiaTechPRImage
Template:GeorgiaTechPRImage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 15:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
- Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:DealsPlus Homepage.png)
Thanks for uploading File:DealsPlus Homepage.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Writers needed
- Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
- Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
- News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Browsing the archives
- Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
- Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
- News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
- News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
- Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
- News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Jackson's death, new data center, more
- Wikipedia in the news: Google News Support, Wired editor plagiarizes Wikipedia, Rohde's kidnapping, Michael Jackson
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CIreland (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
members list templates
I got tired of trying to keep all of these straight. see {{mem}}. These fix some alignment issues. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 19:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
momocon article
I got some notice that it's too much like an advertisement. What do I need to do to change it? ~Jess~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.176.156.44 (talk) 14:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Not really sure. They probably want more refs, and instead of a list of years, distinct paragraphs describing the event's history, etc. Sadly, I don't know of any really good convention articles to use as a model here. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- I looked around, but didn't find anything that was really amazing. E3, Game Developers Conference, San Diego Comic-Con International are all okay articles, and Dragon Con isn't bad, but none of them illustrate how to really write a convention article. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Table Sorting...
Hey, you did some work on Template:AlumniStart back in the day... I'm wondering why nothing's sorting now. Can we fix it? Thanks. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 06:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- See diff. Thanks. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 06:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Is there a defined way that lists/tables are supposed to be organized? In articles such as College of Management (GT), the table doesn't appear to have any organization or a sort button. Aside from tables with the sort options, I am not sure whether a list of notable alumni would be better sorted alphabetically (to easily find a known person), or chronologically by graduation (to track "accomplishment"/changes over time). (If you can't tell, I'm at a sub-novice wikipeida competence right now)Cdbkey1 (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- It boils down to who wrote the template. I haven't particularly bothered with the alumni lists on the college pages, instead preferring to focus on List of Georgia Institute of Technology alumni and List of Georgia Institute of Technology athletes, which (when I wrote them) were sortable. I don't know what's changed since then, but I will one day make them sortable again :) I generally prefer to sort by the person's last name when I write them. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- I added a "sortable" parameter to the template, but it's not enabled by default. I need to decide whether to enable it by default or manually add it to each section of each list. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Georgia Institute of Technology GA Sweeps: On Hold
I have reviewed Georgia Institute of Technology for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 20:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Georgia Institute of Technology Featured Article Nomination
User:Lamenta3 and I have nominated Georgia Institute of Technology for Featured Article status. Please improve the article and contribute to the discussion. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 16:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Help with tables
I made a new table to be used on List of American football stadiums by capacity. I copied the code for Template:StadiumimgStart from a another table which was based on Template:AlumniStart, which I noticed you have edited. I was wondering how to use the parameters Option1 and Option2 to add new columns, so I can use this template on another article. Thank you in advance. --Pgp688 (talk) 00:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Look at how I've added Position to List of Georgia Institute of Technology athletes#American football. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 01:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! --Pgp688 (talk) 01:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 08:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
When you submit this article for FAC, drop me a note. I'd like to do what I can to see that it gets promoted. In the meantime, I've added a handful of tags to the article in spots where things weren't clear. JKBrooks85 (talk) 04:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
GT FAC
- Comments have been added. This is a courtesy message in case watchlists break. :) JKBrooks85 (talk) 10:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
YouTube GAN
Please see my comments at Talk:YouTube/GA2. Thanks! Jclemens (talk) 16:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Alumni Sorting
The (relatively) new template {{alum/start}} didn't have a sortable parameter. And I think that some parserfunctions may have changed as well. The question is, do we want to enable sorting by default? I designed the original template, and that's how I had it, and I doubt anyone is going to object to that feature. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure I was for auto-sorting when I asked about it a few months back. It'd be nice to have. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 07:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- I went ahead and added it. Have a look at a relevant list... for example List of Georgia Institute of Technology alumni. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 09:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)