User talk:Dirifer

This user may have left Wikipedia. Dirifer has not edited Wikipedia since 25 January 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

New user?

Hi, are you new user or returning old one?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antidiskrimanator. This is a new account.

I did not ask you if this was a new account, but if you are new user or returning old one (with new account).
I noticed that you are replacing English language common names of populated places with Albanian language names (like with this diff). Please respect wikipedia policy which says: "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources." --Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:07, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is a new account. I had an old account but i do not use it anymore.
I do not think that 'Dečani' is a common English name. I am from London, and i have never seen the letter 'č' be used before. It is not 'frequently used', as it is not part of the English language. However, I understand that 'ç' in Albanian is not understandable either. I think the best solution to the naming of Dečani/Deçan would be to spell it 'Dechan' as that it is how it is pronounced (in Albanian). I think it would be the most clear way of spelling it, so it can be read in English.
Also, are you a Wiki manager, since you posted on my page requesting if i am a new user?. How does this concern you?

Dirifer (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think 'Dechan' is more suitable than the current spelling. It is also a bit confusing to spell Dechan with a Serbian spelling when the city is mainly of Albanian ehtnicity. It's like calling London 'Londres'. Dirifer (talk) 17:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you continued to replace English language common names of toponyms on Kosovo with Albanian (diff). Please don't do it. Either respect wikipedia policy or start move discussion.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that the 'Albanian Alps' isn't a common English name? Also, the Albanian Alps aren't only in Kosovo - they also lie in Albania - hence the name. I thought that would be obvious... (Albanian Alps, Albania...). You are still ignoring my question above. It's very irritating. I even posted on your talk page. Dirifer (talk) 16:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not a Wiki manager as far as I know. Please accept my sincere apologize if any of my edits irritated you.

I think I gave a fairly clear explanation what is my opinion about replacing English language common names of toponyms with Albanian language names. You are of course free to disagree and to start move discussion. I don't really have much to add to that now. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not irritated by your edits. If you are editing an article so that it is more accurate, that's fine by me. What I meant is that i was irritated because you had yet to reply to my question above, as I was confused why you wanted to know if i was a new user. I understand if you see Decan or Shkoder Lake as Albanian words... but I can't see how 'Albanian Alps' is an Albanian word. Anyway, never mind. We'll leave this discussion for another time. Dirifer (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dirifer, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Dirifer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tafil Buzi

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tafil Buzi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the problem by adding a bracket behind 'then Ottoman Empire'. Dirifer (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 12:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Šarplaninac

Please, do not misrepresent sources. We talked about this a lot on talk, and if you want to raise that question again, do it on talk, and do not disturb old version again. Thanks. --WhiteWriter^speaks 11:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read the source properly. 'It originates from the southwest part of Srbija (southern Kosovo) and the northwest part of Macedonia (Shar Planina, Bistra, Korab, Stogavo, Mavrovo, Jablanica and Pelister, etc.). ' That means the dog is from Kosovo and Macedonia. Also: 'this reserved guardian (the Illyrian sheepdog) exists in sustainable numbers in Albania and Macedonia.' That means it's also in Albania. Regarding YouTube, I looked it up on wiki and it says you can use it as a source, if it's reliable. (Wikipedia:Videos as references, WP: YouTube). Dirifer (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We have multiple sources that it originated from Serbia. Albania will not be included only per fact that it can be found there, as that is not origin. Next time you remove Serbia while sources explicitly mention it, i will be forced to react. National based editing is not welcomed here. That material you send is copyrighted and cannot be used. --WhiteWriter^speaks 11:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You must include that the dog is found in Kosovo, too, as it is also native there. In the country of origin, it does not mention that the Illyrian sheepdog is found in Kosovo. Dirifer (talk) 16:26, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peć, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KLA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RoK

Please, revert back all links where you link RoK with Kosovo. Link should be Kosovo only, without political connotations. Do it now, please, as you did it without any talk page agreement. --WhiteWriter^speaks 17:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On which page? Dirifer (talk) 17:38, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All. --WhiteWriter^speaks 17:42, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have made quite a few changes recently. Can you list what pages you are talking about? I saw the one on Grachanica, what else is there? Dirifer (talk) 17:44, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will report you next time. Please, dont. Štrpce. --WhiteWriter^speaks 16:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Report me for what? Please make yourself clearer. What is the problem with Shtarcpce? And also, you didn't answer my earlier question. You said to 'revert back all links where you link RoK with Kosovo.' Are you referring only to Grachanica, or to something else to? Dirifer (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For this, and similar actions. And by your former accounts you know that you will be blocked per this kind of editing. So dont, please, ever again falsify sources and use wikipedia for propaganda and political struggle. --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My former accounts? What are you talking about? This is my only account. Stop bullshitting me with this stuff about having puppet accounts. If you really think so, why don't you ask a wiki manager to check my ip, and you'll see how wrong you are. You are acting as if i have been vandalising Wiki, but in fact your biased edits is vandilising. Dirifer (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ali Berisha.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian alternative names

Hi,

I noticed that you were adding Albanian language toponyms as alternative names on English language wikipedia even if that toponyms were not widely used in English language sources. That is wrong and unnecessary because in most cases Albanian language names are already presented as such. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are fairly used. You can revert the ones that produce 0 google books hits. But if they still produce results, you shouldn't remove them. As they are Albanian cities, the Albanian names should be given as one of the article names or as an alternate name. Dirifer (talk) 19:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"You can revert the ones that produce 0 google books hits." It is not about what I can revert, its about what you should not add.

" As they are Albanian cities, the Albanian names ..." It is irrelevant if cities belong to Albania or not.

I explained you many times. What only matters is what name is widely used in English language sources. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they are still used, and so shouldn't be removed from the article. I said you can revert them as i didn't know the result had 0 results. I'm not the perfect editor. Also, the cities don't belong to Albania; they belong to the Republic of Kosovo, which is inhabited by Albanians. Dirifer (talk) 09:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Ibri (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Pol430 talk to me 22:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Pollog (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 12:27, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Widely accepted historical English names

Hi,

I noticed you continued with Albanization of English language names. This time you changed widely accepted historical English names in article Albanian–Venetian War (1447–48) (diff). There is a guideline (Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)) which says "If the place does not exist anymore, or the article deals only with a place in a period when it held a different name, the widely accepted historical English name should be used." In case of this article, it was Scutari and Durazzo, not Shkoder and Durres.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:18, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i will change them back (if they haven't been changed already). I assumed they were wrong, my mistake :) . Dirifer (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Albanian Kingdom (1943–44) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mitrovica

Rožaje (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Romans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Gračanica monastery". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 20:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DRN

Your action forced me to ask help at WP.DRN. If you are interested in solving this, please, go to that venue. --WhiteWriter^speaks 20:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A minor change to DRN

Hi there, you're getting this message as you are involved in a case at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard which is currently open. Today DRN has undergone a big move resulting in individual cases on subpages as opposed to all the content on one page. This is to inform you that your case is now back on the DRN board and you will be able to 'watch' the subpage it's located on. Thanks, Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ali Berisha concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ali Berisha, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:39, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ali Berisha

Hello Dirifer. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ali Berisha".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ali Berisha}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]