User talk:Dinaahmed2

Hello, I have been dark on the Arabic Wikipedia by a group of administrators who are mostly 3 people and have Domie Group accounts with editor authority. The administrator Faisal prevented me for no apparent reason. When talking to me in the first, he talked to me about an article I created before I got the authority of an editor. When I prove that, he extracted accounts for me, all of them had legal time and you can search for that. For information, I did not use any account of them because they are not mine, but they belong to another person, and I did not know anything about them. If we assume that these accounts are mine. I did not use any of them and I can verify that Conclusion: My activity was clear to everyone and I did not accept anything contrary. When I use the authority of an editor, it is not my interest in creating articles, but I want to become a number. The pending modifications in the Arabic Wikipedia Zero This is my dream. I do not want anything else, but the distinguished brothers own the Arabic Wikipedia under the name of volunteerism and all their contribution is paid, but the authority they get is the biggest thing they use to hide from what they do what is required. I want someone from outside the group of administrators who are now present to examine the And when they create the article again, they prevent you, what to do if someone blocks you and you use Wikipedia for voluntary reasons, not material, so I don't care about anything but to create another account, and from here they tell you that you are a group, this problem is the biggest problem they use to their advantage.

Welcome!

Hello, Dinaahmed2!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, bonadea contributions talk 13:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia "mirror" sites

Hi Dinaahmed2, thank you for adding sources to Wikipedia articles. Unfortunately, the sources you found can't be used in Wikipedia, however, because those websites take their content straight from Wikipedia. The sites you used are opentripmap.com, en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki, and dbpedia.org. Taking the first of those as an example, this page mentions several times that they get their content from Wikipedia, and links back to the Wikipedia article, and the same is true about the other two sites as well.

Websites that re-publish Wikipedia articles are known as Wikipedia mirrors. Some of them are clear about where they get their info, others don't mention Wikipedia (which means that they violate Wikipedia's terms of service). More information about why mirror sites can't be used as sources, and how to identify them, here. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 13:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali Al-Mahmoudi

Hello Dinaahmed2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ali Al-Mahmoudi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dawkin Verbier (talk) 07:25, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dhaifallah alsumairi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dhaifallah alsumairi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhaifallah alsumairi (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition to the two issues listed in the decline box above (improperly sourced, and not yet shown to meet notability guidelines), there are also problems with the writing. Drafts don't have to be perfect in order to be accepted, but they must be possible to understand. This draft is almost impossible to understand, and it would need a lot of revision to become a readable text.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhaifallah alsumairi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dinaahmed2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dhaifallah alsumairi

Hello, Dinaahmed2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dhaifallah alsumairi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]