User talk:DilJco/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:DilJco. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sardha Wijesoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sardha Wijesoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sardha Wijesoma (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chandana Jayaratne

A tag has been placed on Chandana Jayaratne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dane2007 (talk) 01:39, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pathmajeewa Ganepola

A tag has been placed on Pathmajeewa Ganepola, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 02:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarath Rajapatirana

A tag has been placed on Sarath Rajapatirana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ranil Mallawarachchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranil Mallawarachchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranil Mallawarachchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 02:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chandana Jayaratne

A tag has been placed on Chandana Jayaratne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 02:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amila Karunanayake

A tag has been placed on Amila Karunanayake, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 02:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, DilJco, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 02:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have recreated several pages with the same content that was previously deleted from AfD's. Please do not recreate pages with that were deleted from an AfD if there are no significant changes. If you create a new page that was previously deleted, I recommend that you place a notice with your improvements on the talk page.

The articles you re-created are:

Thank you. Dane2007 (talk) 06:12, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

None of these pages are either inappropriate or copy and paste of deleted pages (it may still consist similar content because the subject is the same & information gathered from world wide web available to all). Thank you. DilJco (talk) 09:53, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

These pages were not changed enough to warrant creation again on Wikipedia. I suggest you review the AfD discussions in order to determine what is needed to potentially bring them up to standards, if possible. Also, the pages are "inappropriate" in that they've been reintroduced without significant changes from the AfD discussions. I suggest you review wikipedia policies. Dane2007 (talk) 18:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

As long as Wikipedia exists any subject can be reintroduced (not copy and paste). A person who is in another country who has never heard of these subjects may tag it "Speedy Deletion" (They may also wonder as to how editors who are born in non English speaking countries are creating these pages in English for subjects that they have never heard or know how popular in another country). Just because some one finds few dead links (could occur due to geographical server traffic all around the world at any given time, page under construction etc) or a YouTube link amongst other reliable sources, it is very unfair it to be tagged for "Speedy Deletion". I have saved many such appropriate articles in the past and will not be deterred.DilJco (talk) 00:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Firstly I think you missing the point. The basic principles of WP is the subject of the articles have to be notable in their own right. To this effect there are a number of policies, which assist in determining whether an individual is notable or not. The articles which have been deleted have been determined not to satisfy those criteria. Simply re-creating the same article without addressing the issue for which they were deleted in the first place is disruptive and contrary to WP policies as outlined by Dane2007. Secondly just because an editor is born in another country does not mean that they don't understand the basic principles upon which WP is created. Also those editors may have a strong understanding of the country and culture, even if they were not born there. Don't assume otherwise. Finally WP is an international forum and as such accessible to all, as such the verifiability of information should be able to sourced no matter where the editor is. Dan arndt (talk) 03:24, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

WP basic principles are well understood (saved many articles that were proposed for deletion by the international forum - wonder someone understood basic principles upon which WP is created?, strong understanding of the country and culture even though some may have not born there? in the first place). All articles created are nourished with verifiable sources (locally published popular newspapers, government web sites etc). Word by word references are not needed and information is found when the sources are read. DilJco (talk) 04:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure where the lapse in understanding is in this. I would again suggest you read wikipedia policies to understand fully why we're trying to guide you in the right direction. You have consensus between two individuals that your articles, as recreated, do not belong on wikipedia after their prior AfD discussions. As noted in the original post in this section, this will serve as your only warning regarding this conduct. Further reintroduction of articles previously deleted via AfD without significant changes may result in a referral to the administrators noticeboard for incidents per the user conduct dispute policy. As @Dan arndt: and I have stated, if you recreate the articles and address the key problems in the AfD there is not an issue. However, the verifiability policy states that the burden of proof to demonstrate verifiability is on you, the editor. As you will have the prior AfD for reference, it is your responsibility to address the problems if you're reintroducing the article and the argument that "the information gathered from the world wide web available to all" is the reason why it has not been improved significantly to address problems would fail and argument. Hope this helps to clear up any confusion! Dane2007 (talk) 04:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

The re-created article Ranil Mallawarachchi was also nominated for speedy deletion by Dan arndt before (key problems in AfD are not addressed is my understanding - I'm not sure where the lapse in understanding is in this)? DilJco (talk) 05:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

The issue then and now is that the article fails to satisfy WP:NMUSIC. All you have provided is that he is the son of Milton Mallawarachchi, who has in the past performed his father songs. Unfortunately notability is not inherited. All of this has been previously stated. Dan arndt (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Ranil being the son of Milton Mallawarachchi was there in the article then and now (ie: deleted & re-created). Milton's son is Ranil was there on Milton's article (many ^{[citation needed]} tags - seems this article too fails to satisfy WP:NMUSIC, notability and can be nominated for Speedy Deletion?) since creation. None of them are world famous singers or their names hardly ever published in a foreign news paper the least. Over to international forum and administrators. DilJco (talk) 05:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Milton Mallawarachchi does met the criteria for notability. The article needs work to improve it to satisfactory standards. There is no independent reliable references cited for the article on Ranil Mallawarachchi however that supports his notability. Advertisements for minor concerts, where he sings his father's songs doesn't make him notable. If there was a review of his concerts published in a newspaper that would could be considered supporting his notability however I can't find any evidence of that. Dan arndt (talk) 03:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Demonstrate verifiability with independent reliable references (possibly word by word citations) ^{[citation needed]}, burden of proof, speedy deletion etc are applied by administrators only to targeted editors...just an example out of many on WP. DilJco (talk) 23:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

The article on Mahesh Amalean is potentially notable due to the fact that he was awarded Deshamanya in 2005. The article lacks references and I have indicated it as such. The issue is creating articles for individuals where you are unable to establish notability according to WP policies and guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Chandana Jayaratne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chandana Jayaratne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandana Jayaratne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dane2007 (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of P. M. Jayatilaka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. M. Jayatilaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. M. Jayatilaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 01:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Hemachandra Wijeratne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hemachandra Wijeratne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemachandra Wijeratne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 00:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sobhitha Rajakaruna

The article Sobhitha Rajakaruna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. The only references provided establish he exists, he went to high school and is one of Sri Lanka's deputy Solicitor Generals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 01:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DilJco. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nishan Silva

The article Nishan Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Individual is just a hotel manager. Winner of minor internal organisational award. Fails WP:ANYBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 11:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vipula Gunatilleke

The article Vipula Gunatilleke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, is a non-notable executive.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 12:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lal Fonseka

The article Lal Fonseka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been tagged for notability since July 2016 with no improvements. Fails WP:ANYBIO - is a minor executive with no notable achievements

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 14:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Lal Fonseka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lal Fonseka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lal Fonseka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Nandadasa Kodagoda.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nandadasa Kodagoda.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Indradasa Hettiarachchi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Indradasa Hettiarachchi.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ruchira Samarasinghe

The article Ruchira Samarasinghe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionable notability - Air Commodore is the most junior general rank of the air-officer and the Purna Bhumi Padakkama is presented to all ranks of the Regular and Volunteer Forces. There is no other evidence of notability. Dan arndt (talk) 06:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sumith Edirisinghe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sumith Edirisinghe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumith Edirisinghe (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 11:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sumith Edirisinghe

A tag has been placed on Sumith Edirisinghe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 07:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Chandra Mendis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chandra Mendis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandra Mendis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 07:20, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mithra Siriwardena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mithra Siriwardena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithra Siriwardena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 07:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Padmalal Sandungahawatte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Padmalal Sandungahawatte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padmalal Sandungahawatte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 07:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of D. S. R. Wanaguru for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. S. R. Wanaguru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. S. R. Wanaguru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 07:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Asoka Wijetilleke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asoka Wijetilleke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asoka Wijetilleke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:H A De S Gunasekara.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:H A De S Gunasekara.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Janaka Wijayanayake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janaka Wijayanayake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janaka Wijayanayake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pushpa Kumarapeli

The article Pushpa Kumarapeli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 07:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deepal Mathew

The article Deepal Mathew has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 04:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Deepal Mathew for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepal Mathew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepal Mathew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lincoln Perera

The article Lincoln Perera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mithra Siriwardena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mithra Siriwardena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithra Siriwardena (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DilJco. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of SDIG Sumith Edirisinghe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SDIG Sumith Edirisinghe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDIG Sumith Edirisinghe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 13:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amila Karunanayake

A tag has been placed on Amila Karunanayake, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 14:12, 13 December 2017 (UTC)